Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with the implementation of the Familias Unidas intervention in a type 3 translational trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This study highlights how Familias Unidas, a Hispanic-specific, evidence-based, family centered preventive intervention, progressed from intervention development (type 1 translation; T1) through rigorous evaluation (T2) and examines the role of intervention fidelity—adherence and competence—in a T3 trial. Effects of participant, provider, and organizational variables on direct (observational) and indirect (self-reported) fidelity were examined as were effects of fidelity. Two structural equation models were estimated using data from 367 Hispanic parent-adolescent dyads randomized to Familias Unidas. Facilitator perceptions of parental involvement in schools, school performance grade, and school socioeconomic status predicted indirect adherence ratings, which were positively related to adolescent substance use. Facilitator openness to evidence-based practices was associated with indirect competence ratings, school performance grade and size were associated with direct competence ratings, and direct competence ratings were negatively associated with substance use. Findings highlight unique contributions of direct and indirect fidelity ratings in the implementation of Familias Unidas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griffin KW, Botvin GJ. Evidence-based interventions for preventing substance use disorders in adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2010; 19(3): 505-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Glasgow RE. Critical measurement issues in translational research. Res Soc Work Pract. 2009.

  3. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al. Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(5): S381-S9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prado G, Pantin H. Reducing substance use and HIV health disparities among Hispanic youth in the USA: the Familias Unidas program of research. Psychosoc Interv. 2011; 20(1): 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Estrada, Y, Huang S, Tapia M., Velázquez MA, Pantin H, Ocasio M, Vidot D, Molleda L, Villamar J, Stepanenko BA, Brown CH, Prado G. Evaluating an efficacious drug use and sexual behavior preventive intervention in a real world setting: Results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Am J Public Health. under review.

  6. Prado G, Pantin H, Briones E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a parent-centered intervention in preventing substance use and HIV risk behaviors in Hispanic adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75(6): 914-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people:: progress and possibilities. Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse Among Children, Youth and Young Adults: Research Advances and Promising Interventions. Mary Ellen O’Connell, Thomas Boat, and Kenneth E. Warner, Editors. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

  8. Fishbein D, Sussman S, Ridenour T, Stahl M. The potential for transdisciplinary translational research, practice and policy to reduce individual and population level disorder burden. Translational Behavioral Medicine. under review.

  9. Pantin H, Schwartz SJ, Sullivan S, Prado G, Szapocznik J. Ecodevelopmental HIV prevention programs for Hispanic adolescents. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004; 74(4): 545-58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Forgatch MS, DeGarmo DS. Sustaining fidelity following the nationwide PMTO™ implementation in Norway. Prev Sci. 2011; 12(3): 235-46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Forgatch MS, Patterson GR, DeGarmo DS. Evaluating fidelity: predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behav Ther. 2005; 36(1): 3-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoenwald SK, Garland AF. A review of treatment adherence measurement methods. Psychol Assess. 2013; 25(1): 146-56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JD, Dishion TJ, Shaw DS, Wilson MN. Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81(6): 962-74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hukkelberg SS, Ogden T. Working alliance and treatment fidelity as predictors of externalizing problem behaviors in parent management training. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81(6): 1010-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cross W, West J, Wyman PA, Schmeelk-Cone K, Xia Y, Tu X, Teisl M, Brown CH, Forgatch M. Observational measures of implementer fidelity for a school-based preventive intervention: development, reliability, and validity. Prevention Science. 2014: Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0488-9.

  16. Eames C, Daley D, Hutchings J, et al. Treatment fidelity as a predictor of behaviour change in parents attending group‐based parent training. Child Care Health Dev. 2009; 35(5): 603-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogue A, Henderson CE, Dauber S, Barajas PC, Fried A, Liddle HA. Treatment adherence, competence, and outcome in individual and family therapy for adolescent behavior problems. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008; 76(4): 544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hogue A, Dauber S, Henderson CE, Liddle HA. Reliability of therapist self-report on treatment targets and focus in family-based intervention. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014; 41: 697-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beidas RS, Kendall PC. Training therapists in evidence‐based practice: a critical review of studies from a systems‐contextual perspective. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2010; 17(1): 1-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pantin H, Schwartz SJ, Sullivan S, Coatsworth JD, Szapocznik J. Preventing substance abuse in Hispanic immigrant adolescents: an ecodevelopmental, parent-centered approach. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2003; 25(4): 469-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Breitenstein SM, Fogg L, Garvey C, Hill C, Resnick B, Gross D. Measuring implementation fidelity in a community-based parenting intervention. Nurs Res. 2010; 59(3): 158-65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Prado G, Pantin H, Schwartz SJ, Lupei NS, Szapocznik J. Predictors of engagement and retention into a parent-centered, ecodevelopmental HIV preventive intervention for Hispanic adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006; 31(9): 874-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Payne AA, Eckert R. The relative importance of provider, program, school, and community predictors of the implementation quality of school-based prevention programs. Prev Sci. 2010; 11(2): 126-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haug NA, Shopshire M, Tajima B, Gruber V, Guydish J. Adoption of evidence-based practices among substance abuse treatment providers. J Drug Educ. 2008; 38(2): 181-92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson TD, Steele RG, Mize JA. Practitioner attitudes toward evidence-based practice: themes and challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2006; 33(3): 398-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson TD, Steele RG. Predictors of practitioner self-reported use of evidence-based practices: practitioner training, clinical setting, and attitudes toward research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2007; 34(4): 319-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Domitrovich CE, Bradshaw CP, Poduska JM, et al. Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: a conceptual framework. Adv School Mental Health Promotion. 2008; 1(3): 6-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bakker J, Denessen E, Brus‐Laeven M. Socio‐economic background, parental involvement and teacher perceptions of these in relation to pupil achievement. Educ Stud. 2007; 33(2): 177-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ringwalt CL, Ennett S, Johnson R, et al. Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation's middle schools. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30(3): 375-91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Payne AA, Gottfredson DC, Gottfredson GD. School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: results from a national study. Prev Sci. 2006; 7(2): 225-37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gregory A, Henry DB, Schoeny ME. School climate and implementation of a preventive intervention. Am J Community Psychol. 2007; 40(3–4): 250-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cervantes RC, Padilla AM, Salgado de Snyder N. The Hispanic Stress Inventory: A culturally relevant approach to psychosocial assessment. Psychological assessment: a journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1991; 3(3): 438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rio AT, Quay HC, Santisteban DA, Szapocznik J. Factor-analytic study of a Spanish translation of the revised behavior problem checklist. J Clin Child Psychol. 1989; 18(4): 343-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pantin H. Ecodevelopmental measures of support and conflict for Hispanic youth and families. Miami, FL: University of Miami School of Medicine; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gorman-Smith D, Tolan PH, Zelli A, Huesmann LR. The relation of family functioning to violence among inner-city minority youths. J Fam Psychol. 1996; 10(2): 115-29. PubMed PMID: 1996-04237-001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolan PH, Gorman-Smith D, Huesmann LR, Zelli A. Assessment of family relationship characteristics: a measure to explain risk for antisocial behavior and depression among urban youth. Psychol Assess. 1997; 9(3): 212-23. PubMed PMID: 1997-05741-006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aarons GA. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Ment Health Serv Res. 2004; 6(2): 61-74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(2): 237-56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community‐based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010; 33(2): 164-73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown CH, Mohr DC, Gallo CG, et al. A computational future for preventing HIV in minority communities: how advanced technology can improve implementation of effective programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 63(0 1): S72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gallo C, Pantin H, Villamar J, Prado G, Tapia M, Ogihara M, Cruden G, Brown CH. Blending qualitative and computational linguistics methods for fidelity assessment: Experience with the Familias Unidas preventive intervention. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014:1–12

  42. Barber JP, Gallop R, Crits-Christoph P, Frank A, Thase ME, Weiss RD. Beth Connolly Gibbons M. The role of therapist adherence, therapist competence, and alliance in predicting outcome of individual drug counseling: results from the National Institute Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Psychother Res. 2006; 16(02): 229-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wandersman A, Chien VH, Katz J. Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 50: 445-59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Klimes-Dougan B, August GJ, Lee C-YS, et al. Practitioner and site characteristics that relate to fidelity of implementation: the Early Risers prevention program in a going-to-scale intervention trial. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2009; 40(5): 467-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prado G, Pantin H, Estrada Y. Integrating evidence-based interventions for adolescents into primary care. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 48(4): 488-90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This was an investigator-initiated study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA025192 to Guillermo Prado, PhD; P30 DA027828 to C. Hendricks Brown) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 DA025192S1 to Guillermo Prado, PhD). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the paper or decision to submit the paper for publication. The researchers were independent from the funders. All authors had full access to all data and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of data analysis.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures for this study, including the informed consent process, were performed in accordance with ethical standards and protection for human subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara M. St. George.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: Community practitioners should learn more about factors found to facilitate or impede the translation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and use observational methods for monitoring intervention fidelity.

Research: Researchers should exercise caution when using self-reported measures to monitor intervention fidelity and should further examine resource-efficient observational methods.

Policy: Policy makers should facilitate the process of bringing preventive EBIs to scale and ensure they are appropriately implemented through the use of observational methods for monitoring fidelity.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

St. George, S.M., Huang, S., Vidot, D.C. et al. Factors associated with the implementation of the Familias Unidas intervention in a type 3 translational trial. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 6, 105–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0344-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0344-x

Keywords

Navigation