Skip to main content
Log in

The EARLY trials: a consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults

  • Original research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Young adulthood has been identified as a high-risk period for the development of obesity but few interventions have been tested in this population. One way to escalate our learning about effective interventions is to test a number of interventions simultaneously as a consortium of research trials. This paper describes the Early Adult Reduction of weight through LifestYle intervention (EARLY) trials. Seven research sites were funded to conduct intervention trials, agreeing to test similar primary outcomes and cooperating to use a set of common measurement tools. The EARLY consortium was able to work cooperatively using an executive committee, a steering committee, workgroups and subcommittees to help direct the common work and implement a set of common protocol and measurement tools for seven independent but coordinated weight-related intervention trials. Using a consortium of studies to help young adults reach or maintain a healthy weight will result in increased efficiency and speed in understanding the most effective intervention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Finkelstein E, Trogdon J, Cohen J, et al. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff. 2009; 28(5): w822-w831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2012; 307(5): 483-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(6): 563-570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011; 378(9793): 815-825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson DF, Kahn HS, Remington PL, Anda RF. The 10-year incidence of overweight and major weight gain in US adults. Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150: 665-672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2012; 307(5): 491-497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis CE, Jacobs DR Jr, McCreath H, et al. Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study. Coronary artery risk development in young adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151(12): 1172-1181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ford E, Capewell S. Coronary heart disease mortaility among young adults in the U.S. from 1980 through 2002. Concealed leveling of mortality rates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 2128-2132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones DS, Greene JA. The decline and rise of coronary heart disease: understanding public health catastrophism. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(7): 1207-1218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd-Jones DM, Liu K, Colangelo LA, et al. Consistently stable or decreased body mass index in young adulthood and longitudinal changes in metabolic syndrome components: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Circulation. 2007; 115(8): 1004-1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daviglus ML, Liu K, Pirzada A, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile earlier in life and Medicare costs in the last year of life. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(9): 1028-1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loria CM, Signore C, Arteaga SS. The need for targeted weight-control approaches in young women and men. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(2): 233-235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeh HC, Clark JM, Emmons KE, et al. Independent but coordinated trials: insights from the practice-based opportunities for weight reduction trials collaborative research group. Clin Trials. 2010; 7(4): 322-332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lytle LA, Nanney MS, Laska MN, Linde JA, Sevcik SM, Petrich, CA. Designing a weight gain prevention trial for young adults: the CHOICES study. American Journal of Health Education. 2014; in press.

  15. Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(15): 1563-1571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bennett LM GH, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration & Team Science: A field guide. 2010.

  17. Belle SH, Czaja SJ, Schulz R, et al. Using a new taxonomy to combine the uncombinable: integrating results across diverse interventions. Psychology Aging. 2003; 18(3): 396-405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14(1): 26-33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11): 1479-1498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. CARDIA Study. CARDIA III Year 5 (1990–1991): Sociodemographic Questionnaire. CARDIA III Year 5 (1990–1991). Accessed 28 July 2010.

  21. Boynton Health Service at the University of Minnesota. College Student Health Survey 2008. http://www.bhs.umn.edu/healthdata/surveys. Accessed 28 July 2010.

  22. NCI. Diet History Questionnaire: National Cancer Institute. National Institutes of Health; 2007.

  23. Nelson MC, Lytle LA. Development and evaluation of a brief screener to estimate fast-food and beverage consumption among adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(4): 730-734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. CITY Study. From formative work/focus group questions. Personal communication with Pao-Hwa Lin ed. August 4, 2010.

  25. French S, Jeffery R, Murray D. Is dieting good for you? Prevalence, duration, and associated weight and behaviour changes for specific weight loss strategies over four years in US adults. Int J Obes. 1999; 23: 320-327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Linde J, Jeffery R, French S, Pronk N, Boyle R. Self-weighing in weight gain prevention and weight loss trials. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 30: 210-216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raynor D, Phelan S, Hill J, Wing R. Television viewing and long-term weight maintenance: Results from the national weight control registry. Obes Res. 2006; 14: 1816-1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. 2009.

  29. American Legacy Foundation. National Youth Tobacco Survey 2002 Questionnaire. http://www.legacyforhealth.org/1106.aspx. Accessed 19 August 2010.

  30. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1: 385-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994; 10(2): 77-84.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lytle LA, Pasch KE, Farbakhsh K. The relationship between sleep and weight in a sample of adolescents. Obesity. 2011; 19: 324-331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Buysse D, Reynolds C, Monk T, Berman S, Kupfer D. The Pittsburg sleep quality index (PSQI): a new instrument for psychiatric research and practice. Psychiatry Res. 1989; 28: 193-213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES 2007–2008. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed 28 July 2010.

  35. Sallis J, Kerr J, Carlson J, et al. Evaluating a brief self-report measure of neighborhood environments for physical activity research and surveillance: Physical activity neighborhood environment scale (PANES). J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7: 533-540.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paffenbarger R, Wing A, Hyde R. Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol. 1978; 108: 161-175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire version 2. http://www.who.int/chp/steps/GPAQ. Accessed February 2010.

  38. CARDIA Study. CARDIA VIII, year 25, Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire. E-mail communication with John Jakicic. February 11, 2010.

  39. Rosenburg D, Norman G, Wagner N, Patrick D, Calfas K, Sallis J. Reliability and validity of the sedentary behavior questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(6): 697-705.

    Google Scholar 

  40. VanWormer J, Martinez AM, Cosentino D, Pronk NP. Satisfaction with a weight loss program: what matters? Am J Health Promot. 2010; 24(4): 238-245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baldwin AS, Rothman AJ, Hertel AW, Keenan NK, Jeffery RW. Longitudinal associations between people's cessation-related experiences and their satisfaction with cessation. Psychol Health. 2009; 24(2): 187-201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The EARLY trials are funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: HL096760-02 (Fernandez and Olson), HL096770-01 (Jakicic), HL096628-01 (Johnson), HL096767-01 (Lytle), HL096715-01 (Patrick), HL096720-01 (Svetkey), HL090864 (Wing), and HL090875 (Espeland). All of the trials are registered as clinical trials: NCT01134783 (CHOICES), NCT01092364 (CITY), NCT01331564 (e-MomsRoc), NCT01121871 (IDEA), NCT01200459 (SMART), NCT01183689 (SNAP), and NCT01199185 (TARGIT). The authors would like to acknowledge all of the investigators involved in the EARLY trials and Megan Treziok and Helena Knego for their help with tables and formatting the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie A Lytle PhD, MS.

Additional information

Implications

Researchers: A common protocol and set of measurement tools to assess the same primary outcome across seven studies allows researchers to pool data and to make comparisons in efficacy across a variety of intervention strategies.

Practitioners: Standardizing elements of independent studies while testing a variety of intervention approaches allows practitioners to evaluate a wide set of strategies for weight management and to make better decisions about the most effective and appropriate strategies for their population.

Policy-makers: Evaluating the comparative efficacy of a variety of approaches to weight management for young adults allows a more rapid translation of actionable strategies for policy makers.

About this article

Cite this article

Lytle, L.A., Svetkey, L.P., Patrick, K. et al. The EARLY trials: a consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 4, 304–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0252-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0252-5

KEYWORDS

Navigation