Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 495–503 | Cite as

Dear Doc: advice for collaborators

Essay/Opinion Piece


Years ago, when Doc was a junior faculty member she became aware of a situation that changed her life. An extremely well-known senior scientist in her department took the data of a graduate student and published it in a very significant, oft-cited paper without crediting the student in any way. That this action had the tacit approval of the department chair was confusing. Dismayed by this violation of trust and feeling powerless to intervene, she decided to become the Dear Abby of Science. Working in the lab during the day she was becoming a world-renowned researcher as well as a highly revered mentor to younger scientists. At night, disguised as Dr. Doc she began advising other researchers who were looking for help with their sticky situations. As word of mouth spread about Doc more and more researchers sought out her advice about a wide range of problems in their labs and in their collaborations. She is currently entertaining a proposal from a collaborative group of editors from high-impact journals to develop a web presence that would offer insightful advice to struggling scientific collaborators around the world. The following is a selection of letters from Doc’s files focused on collaboration. The names and details in the letters have been changed to protect confidentiality.


Collaboration Team science Trust Vision Expectations Collaborative agreement Pretenure agreement Managing conflict Promoting disagreement Diversity Power 


  1. 1.
    Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Team science and collaboration: a field guide. In: DHHS, ed. Bethesda; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berndt AE. Developing collaborative research agreements. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37(5):497-498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012;60(5):768-775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewicki RJ. Trust and Distrust. In: Schneider AK, Honeyman C, eds. The negotiator's fieldbook. Washington, DC: American Bar Association; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas KW, Killman R. Thomas–Kilmann conflict mode instrument. CPP; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    French JJ, Raven B. The Bases of Social Power. In: Cartwright D, ed. Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1959.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hill L. Power dynamics in organizations. Harv Bus Sch Note. 1994;9-494-083:1-13.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003;58(9):697-720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9. Daneil Kahneman—Autobiography. 2002; Accessed September 26, 2011.
  10. 10.
    Bennett L, Gadlin H. Tenure track offer template. 2011; Accessed May 18, 2012.
  11. 11.
    Gray B. Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S124-S132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O'Connell D, Hickerson K, Pillutla A. Organizational visioning: an integrative review. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36:102-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(1):26-44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuckman B. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull. 1965;63(6):384-399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ang S, Van Dyne L. Handbook of cultural intelligence: theory measurement and application. Armonk, NY: Sharpe; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill; 2010.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organization as across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Cooperative Resolution, ODNIHBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Intramural Research, NHLBINIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations