Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging Findings of 18F-Choline and 18F-DOPA PET/MRI in a Case of Glioblastoma Multiforme Pseudoprogression: Correlation with Clinical Outcome

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the case of 74-year-old-male, previously treated with fronto-parietal craniotomy due to primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, at 1 month after completing RT + TMZ, depicted partial response. Three months later, the patient was submitted to a further brain MRI, that resulted doubtful for therapy induced changes (i.e., pseudoprogression). The patient, who had been previously treated with prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PC), underwent a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with 18F-choline for PC biochemical recurrence. 18F-choline whole body PET/CT resulted negative for PC relapse, while segmental brain PET, co-registered with MRI, demonstrated increased tracer uptake corresponding to tumor boundaries. In order to solve differential diagnosis between pseudoprogression and GBM recurrence, brain PET/CT with 18F-L-dihydroxy-phenil-alanine (18F-DOPA) was subsequently performed: fused axial PET/MRI images showed increased 18F-DOPA incorporation in the peri-tumoral edema, but not in tumor boundaries, consistent with the suspicion of GBM pseudoprogression, as then confirmed by clinical and radiological follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJB, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaffer A, Kwok SS, Naik A, Anderson AT, Lam F, Wszalek T, et al. Ultra-high-field MRI in the diagnosis and management of gliomas: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2022;13: 857825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chawla S, Bukhari S, Afridi OM, Wang S, Yadav SK, Akbari H, et al. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e4719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santo G, Laudicella R, Linguanti F, Nappi AG, Abenavoli E, Vergura V, et al. The utility of conventional amino acid pet radiotracers in the evaluation of glioma recurrence also in comparison with MRI. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:844.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong Z, Zhang Y, Liu D, Liu P, Shi Y, Wang Y, et al. Role of traditional CHO PET parameters in distinguishing IDH, TERT and MGMT alterations in primary diffuse gliomas. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35:493–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J, Boellaard R, Drzezga A, Galldiks N, et al. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:540–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerstner ER, McNamara MB, Norden AD, LaFrankie D, Wen PY. Effect of adding temozolomide to radiation therapy on the incidence of pseudo-progression. J Neurooncol. 2009;94:97–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thust SC, van den Bent MJ, Smits M. Pseudoprogression of brain tumors: pseudoprogression of Brain Tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:571–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palumbo B, Angotti F, Marano GD. Relationship between PET-FDG and MRI apparent diffusion coefficients in brain tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53:17–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez-Río M, Testart Dardel N, Santiago Chinchilla A, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Olivares Granados G, Luque Caro R, et al. 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT as a complementary tool in the follow-up of low-grade glioma: diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:886–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Filippi L, Schillaci O, Bagni O. Recent advances in PET probes for hepatocellular carcinoma characterization. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:341–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao L, Xu W, Li T, Zheng J, Chen G. Accuracy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97: e11556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galldiks N, Law I, Pope WB, Arbizu J, Langen K-J. The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;13:386–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Treglia G, Muoio B, Trevisi G, Mattoli MV, Albano D, Bertagna F, et al. Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of PET/CT with different tracers for brain tumors: a systematic review of published meta-analyses. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:E4669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiaravalloti A, Fiorentini A, Villani V, Carapella C, Pace A, Di Pietro B, et al. Factors affecting 18F FDOPA standardized uptake value in patients with primary brain tumors after treatment. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42:355–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolcaen J, Descamps B, Deblaere K, Boterberg T, De Vos PF, Kalala J-P, et al. (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (FCho), (18)F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the discrimination between high-grade glioma and radiation necrosis in rats: a PET study. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42:38–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brindle KM, Izquierdo-García JL, Lewis DY, Mair RJ, Wright AJ. Brain tumor imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2432–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verburg N, Koopman T, Yaqub M, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA, Schwarte LA, et al. Direct comparison of [11C] choline and [18F] FET PET to detect glioma infiltration: a diagnostic accuracy study in eight patients. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jabeen S, Arbind A, Kumar D, Singh PK, Saini J, Sadashiva N, et al. Combined amino acid PET-MRI for identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas: together we grow. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2021;5:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LF was responsible for the idea. LF, AS, and BP wrote the manuscript. OB was responsible for PET/CT execution. BP performed PET/MRI co-registration and fusion. OS supervised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Filippi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Luca Filippi, Angela Spanu, Oreste Bagni, Orazio Schillaci, and Barbara Palumbo declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for Publication

Written consent has been obtained from the participant for the anonymized use of data for research purpose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filippi, L., Spanu, A., Bagni, O. et al. Imaging Findings of 18F-Choline and 18F-DOPA PET/MRI in a Case of Glioblastoma Multiforme Pseudoprogression: Correlation with Clinical Outcome. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 56, 245–251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00758-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00758-2

Keywords

Navigation