![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13139-013-0237-1/MediaObjects/13139_2013_237_Fig1_HTML.gif)
References
Bagley FH, Walsh JW, Cady B, Salzman FA, Oberfield RA, Pazianos AG. Carcinomatosis versus radiation indiced brachial plexus neuropathy in breast cancer. Cancer. 1978;41:2154–7.
Cascino TL, Kori S, Krol G, Foley KM. CT of the brachial plexus as demonstrated on computed tomography. Neurology. 1983;33:1553–7.
Ho L, Hendersen R, Luong T, Malkhassian S, Wassef H. F-18 FDG PET/CT appearance of metastatic brachial plexopathy involving epidural space from breast carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:e263–4.
Luthra K, Shah S, Purandare N, Medhi S, Rangrajan V, Samuel AM. F-18 FDG PET-CT appearance of metastatic brachial plexopathy in a case of carcinoma breast. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31:432–4.
Ahmad A, Barrington S, Maisey M, Rubens RD. Use of positron emission tomography in evaluation of brachial plexopathy in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:478–82.
Thyagrajan D, Cascino T, Harms G. Magnetic resonance imaging in brachial plexopathy of cancer. Neurology. 1995;45:421–7.
Sherrier R, Sostman HD. MRI in traumatic and non-traumatic brachial plexopathy. J Thorac Imaging. 1993;8:27–33.
Rapaport S, Blair DN, McCarthy SM, Desser TS. Brachial plexus correlation of MR imaging with CT and pathological findings. Radiology. 1988;167:161–5.
Ahern V, Soo YS, Langlands AD. MRI scanning in brachial plexus neuropathy. Australas Radiol. 1991;35:379–81.
Panasci DJ, Holliday RA, Shpinzer B. Advanced imaging techniques of the brachial plexus. Hand Clin. 1995;11:545–53.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. No funding was received from any organisation for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tripathi, M., Das, C.J., Srivastava, A. et al. Metastatic Brachial Plexopathy in a Case of Recurrent Breast Carcinoma Demonstrated on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48, 85–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-013-0237-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-013-0237-1