Skip to main content

Usefulness of Combined Metabolic–Volumetric Indices of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of metabolic-volumetric indices of 18F- fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in breast cancer.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled in the study. They underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and received four or six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, interim 18F-FDG PET/CT was done after second cycle of chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesions were calculated. Reduction rates of these parameters were obtained between baseline and interim 18F-FDG PET/CT. Chemotherapy outcomes were assessed using tumor size reduction rate and histological grading system (Miller and Payne system). Reduction rates of SUVmax, MTV, and TLG correlated with chemotherapy outcomes.

Results

MTV and TLG reduction rates showed significant correlation with tumor size reduction rate (R = 0.68, P = 0.0004; R = 0.62, P = 0.002, respectively). However, SUVmax reduction rate showed no significant correlation. MTV and TLG reduction rates were significantly higher in responders than nonresponders, as determined by Miller and Payne system (P < 0.0007, P < 0.002). However, SUVmax reduction rate showed no significant difference. On ROC analysis, the area under the MTV and TLG curves was 0.886, and that of SUVmax was 0.743. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to predict histopathologic response were the same for MTV and TLG, and the values were 100 %, 85.7 %, 83.3 %, and 100 %, respectively (at the reduction rate of 93.2 % for MTV, and 95.8 % for TLG).

Conclusion

Changes of metabolic–volumetric indices successfully reflected the neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes. MTV and TLG could be robust indices in discriminating pathologic responder as SUVmax, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.

  2. Giordano SH. Update on locally advanced breast cancer. Oncologist. 2003;8:521–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Espie M, Rubello D, Moretti JL, Hindie E. Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with (18)F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:419–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rousseau C, Devillers A, Sagan C, Ferrer L, Bridji B, Campion L, et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5366–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB, Hoekstra OS, Stoker J, Fockens P, et al. Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy–systematic review. Radiology. 2005;236:841–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalff V, Duong C, Drummond EG, Matthews JP, Hicks RJ. Findings on 18F-FDG PET scans after neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides prognostic stratification in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma subsequently treated by radical surgery. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:14–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahl RL, Zasadny K, Helvie M, Hutchins GD, Weber B, Cody R. Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:2101–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, Sassen S, Mahner S, Kahlert S, et al. Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:535–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar A, Kumar R, Seenu V, Gupta SD, Chawla M, Malhotra A, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluation of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1347–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duch J, Fuster D, Munoz M, Fernandez PL, Paredes P, Fontanillas M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1551–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martoni AA, Zamagni C, Quercia S, Rosati M, Cacciari N, Bernardi A et al. Early (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography may identify a subset of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who will not respond optimally to preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116:805–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seol YM, Kwon BR, Song MK, Choi YJ, Shin HJ, Chung JS et al. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer treated by chemo-radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:201–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roedl JB, Halpern EF, Colen RR, Sahani DV, Fischman AJ, Blake MA. Metabolic tumor width parameters as determined on PET/CT predict disease-free survival and treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:54–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chung MK, Jeong HS, Park SG, Jang JY, Son YI, Choi JY, et al. Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5861–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu D, Ma T, Niu Z, Zheng J, Han A, Zhao S, et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:332–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi K-H, Yoo IR, Han EJ, Kim YS, Kim GW, Na SJ, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas treated by surgery. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim BS, Kim IJ, Kim S-J, Nam H-Y, Pak KJ, Kim K, et al. The prognostic value of the metabolic tumor volume in FIGO stage IA to IIB cervical cancer for tumor recurrence: measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:36–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Costelloe CM, Macapinlac HA, Madewell JE, Fitzgerald NE, Mawlawi OR, Rohren EM, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:340–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheon GJ, Kim MS, Lee JA, Lee SY, Cho WH, Song WS, et al. Prediction model of chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma by 18F-FDG PET and MRI. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1435–40.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Im HJ, Kim TS, Park SY, Min HS, Kim JH, Kang HG, et al. Prediction of tumour necrosis fractions using metabolic and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT indices, after one course and at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in children and young adults with osteosarcoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:39–49.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, Hutcheon AW, Sarkar TK, Smith I, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003;12:320–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy JD, La TH, Chu K, Quon A, Fischbein NJ, Maxim PG, et al. Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:514–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyou CY, Cho N, Kim SM, Jang M, Park JS, Baek SY et al. Computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI for the residual tumor extent and response monitoring in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McDermott GM, Welch A, Staff RT, Gilbert FJ, Schweiger L, Semple SI, et al. Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:75–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vranjesevic D, Schiepers C, Silverman DH, Quon A, Villalpando J, Dahlbom M, et al. Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1238–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2011-0018636).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Kyeong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Im, HJ., Kim, Y.K., Kim, Yi. et al. Usefulness of Combined Metabolic–Volumetric Indices of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47, 36–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0181-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0181-5

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Metabolic tumor volume
  • Total lesion glycolysis
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT