Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of Simple Quantification Methods for 18F-FP-CIT PET Using Automatic Delineation of Volumes of Interest Based on Statistical Probabilistic Anatomical Mapping and Isocontour Margin Setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

18F-FP-CIT positron emission tomography (PET) is an effective imaging for dopamine transporters. In usual clinical practice, 18F-FP-CIT PET is analyzed visually or quantified using manual delineation of a volume of interest (VOI) for the striatum. In this study, we suggested and validated two simple quantitative methods based on automatic VOI delineation using statistical probabilistic anatomical mapping (SPAM) and isocontour margin setting.

Methods

Seventy-five 18F-FP-CIT PET images acquired in routine clinical practice were used for this study. A study-specific image template was made and the subject images were normalized to the template. Afterwards, uptakes in the striatal regions and cerebellum were quantified using probabilistic VOI based on SPAM. A quantitative parameter, QSPAM, was calculated to simulate binding potential. Additionally, the functional volume of each striatal region and its uptake were measured in automatically delineated VOI using isocontour margin setting. Uptake-volume product (QUVP) was calculated for each striatal region. QSPAM and QUVP were compared with visual grading and the influence of cerebral atrophy on the measurements was tested.

Results

Image analyses were successful in all the cases. Both the QSPAM and QUVP were significantly different according to visual grading (P < 0.001). The agreements of QUVP or QSPAM with visual grading were slight to fair for the caudate nucleus (κ = 0.421 and 0.291, respectively) and good to perfect to the putamen (κ = 0.663 and 0.607, respectively). Also, QSPAM and QUVP had a significant correlation with each other (P < 0.001). Cerebral atrophy made a significant difference in QSPAM and QUVP of the caudate nuclei regions with decreased 18F-FP-CIT uptake.

Conclusion

Simple quantitative measurements of QSPAM and QUVP showed acceptable agreement with visual grading. Although QSPAM in some group may be influenced by cerebral atrophy, these simple methods are expected to be effective in the quantitative analysis of 18F-FP-CIT PET in usual clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niznik HB, Fogel EF, Fassos FF, Seeman P. The dopamine transporter is absent in parkinsonian putamen and reduced in the caudate nucleus. J Neurochem. 1991;56:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klaffke S, Kuhn AA, Plotkin M, Amthauer H, Harnack D, Felix R, et al. Dopamine transporters, D2 receptors, and glucose metabolism in corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord. 2006;21:1724–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kas A, Payoux P, Habert MO, Malek Z, Cointepas Y, El Fakhri G, et al. Validation of a standardized normalization template for statistical parametric mapping analysis of 123I-FP-CIT images. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oh SW, Kim YK, Lee BC, Kim BS, Kim JS, Kim JM, et al. Evaluation of multiple system atrophy and early Parkinson’s disease using 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;43:10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kazumata K, Dhawan V, Chaly T, Antonini A, Margouleff C, Belakhlef A, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging with fluorine-18-FPCIT and PET. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1521–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh JK, Yoo ID, Seo YY, Chung YA, Yoo IR, Kim SH, et al. Clinical significance of F-18 FP-CIT dual time point PET imaging in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robeson W, Dhawan V, Belakhlef A, Ma Y, Pillai V, Chaly T, et al. Dosimetry of the dopamine transporter radioligand 18F-FPCIT in human subjects. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:961–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien JT, McKeith IG, Walker Z, Tatsch K, Booij J, Darcourt J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in possible dementia with Lewy bodies. Br J Psychiatr. 2009;194:34–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall VL, Reininger CB, Marquardt M, Patterson J, Hadley DM, Oertel WH, et al. Parkinson’s disease is overdiagnosed clinically at baseline in diagnostically uncertain cases: a 3-year European multicenter study with repeat [123I]FP-CIT SPECT. Mov Disord. 2009;24:500–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eggers C, Kahraman D, Fink GR, Schmidt M, Timmermann L. Akinetic–rigid and tremor–dominant Parkinson’s disease patients show different patterns of FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography. Mov Disord. 2011;26:416–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh M, Kim JS, Kim JY, Shin KH, Park SH, Kim HO, et al. Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:399–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Contrafatto D, Mostile G, Nicoletti A, Dibilio V, Raciti L, Lanzafame S, et al. [123I] FP-CIT SPECT asymmetry index to differentiate Parkinson’s disease from vascular parkinsonism. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;126:12-6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ma Y, Dhawan V, Mentis M, Chaly T, Spetsieris P, Eidelberg D. Parametric mapping of [18F]FPCIT binding in early stage Parkinson’s disease: a PET study. Synapse. 2002;45:125–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Zuo CT, Jiang YP, Guan YH, Chen ZP, Xiang JD, et al. 18F-FP-CIT PET imaging and SPM analysis of dopamine transporters in Parkinson’s disease in various Hoehn & Yahr stages. J Neurol. 2007;254:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eshuis S, Jager P, Maguire R, Jonkman S, Dierckx R, Leenders K. Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:454–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JS, Lee DS, Kim YK, Kim JS, Lee JM, Koo BB, et al. Quantification of brain images using korean standard templates and structural and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps. Korea J Nucl Med. 2004;38:241–52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eo JS, Lee H-Y, Lee JS, Kim YK, Jeon B-S, Lee DS. Automated analysis of 123I-beta-CIT SPECT images with statistical probabilistic anatomical map. MS Thesis. Seoul: Seoul National University 2006.

  18. Colloby SJ, O’Brien JT, Fenwick JD, Firbank MJ, Burn DJ, McKeith IG, et al. The application of statistical parametric mapping to 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage. 2004;23:956–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J, Zilles K, et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc B. 2001;356:1293–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JS, Lee DS. Analysis of functional brain images using population-based probabilistic atlas. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2005;1:81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koch W, Radau PE, Hamann C, Tatsch K. Clinical testing of an optimized software solution for an automated, observer-independent evaluation of dopamine transporter SPECT studies. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1109–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JS, Lee DS, Park KS, Chung JK, Lee MC. Changes in the heterogeneity of cerebral glucose metabolism with healthy aging: quantitative assessment by fractal analysis. J Neuroimaging. 2004;14:350–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (no. 2011K000719)

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin Chul Paeng or Jae Sung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Yi., Im, HJ., Paeng, J.C. et al. Validation of Simple Quantification Methods for 18F-FP-CIT PET Using Automatic Delineation of Volumes of Interest Based on Statistical Probabilistic Anatomical Mapping and Isocontour Margin Setting. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46, 254–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0159-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0159-3

Keywords

Navigation