Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Theory to Practice: Role-Playing and Knowledge Building in Digital Learning Environments

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s educational landscape, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, problem-solving, and information literacy are essential skills. This study examines the relationship between knowledge construction and student roles within a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment, focusing on case-based discussions. Forty third-year students from a university in Western China participated, forming eight groups. The analysis identified seven distinct roles: Elucidator, Commenter, Paster, Rebutter, Echoer, Prompter, and Warmer. Findings revealed that Commenters and Rebutters significantly contributed to knowledge construction through group discourse, while Elucidators effectively connected problems with relevant concepts. Prompters facilitated linking claims across problem and concept spaces, and Warmers, despite their peripheral role, enhanced group atmosphere by integrating prior knowledge into discussions. This study highlights the complex nature of knowledge construction in CSCL settings, emphasizing the importance of recognizing both explicit interactions and underlying cognitive processes. The results suggest that well-designed role-playing activities can enhance digital education by promoting deeper learning and collaboration. Educators can leverage these insights to design more effective CSCL activities, fostering innovation in educational practices and contributing to the broader knowledge economy. This research underscores the societal impact of advanced educational technologies, supporting entrepreneurship and technological development within the academic community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abramovich, S., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2013). The role of evaluative metadata in an online teacher resource exchange. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 807–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: A review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Kim, J. H., & Glass, M. (2022). Machine assessment of student discussion-board formal-style debates. In 21st European conference on e-learning ECEL 2022 (p. 79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darmawansah, D., Lin, C. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). Empowering the collective reflection-based argumentation mapping strategy to enhance students' argumentative speaking. Computers & Education, 184, 104516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuchar, A. (2022). The problem with international students”experiences' and the promise of their practices: Reanimating research about international students in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchatelet, D., Spooren, P., Bursens, P., Gijbels, D., & Donche, V. (2021). Explaining self-efficacy development in an authentic higher education learning context of role-play simulations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, E., van der Pol, J., Ryan, T., Clark, P. M., & Mary, J. (2013). Enhancing student knowledge acquisition from online learning conversations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 113–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyzi Behnagh, R., & Yasrebi, S. (2020). An examination of constructivist educational technologies: Key affordances and conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1907–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Lundin, J., & Lindberg, J. O. (2020). Rethinking and reinventing learning, education and collaboration in the digital age—From creating technologies to transforming cultures. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, H. B. (2022). Using collaborative group learning principles to foster community in online classrooms. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 42(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking. Science & Education, 29(3), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, W., Moustafa, A., Ito, T., Zhang, M., & Yang, C. (2021). A case-based reasoning approach for supporting facilitation in online discussions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30, 719–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, D. (2005). Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. Argumentation, 19, 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppel, K. (2021). The influence of collaborative argument mapping on college students' critical thinking about contentious arguments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasuk, T., & Virkus, S. (2024). Exploring the power of telepresence: Enhancing education through telepresence robots. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(1/2), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klamen, D., Suh, B., & Tischkau, S. (2022). Problem-based learning. In An introduction to medical teaching: The foundations of curriculum design, delivery, and assessment (pp. 115–131). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, A. A., Cheng, Z., Fiock, H., Wang, H., Janakiraman, S., & Chartier, K. (2022). Examining students' use of online case-based discussions to support problem solving: Considering individual and collaborative experiences. Computers & Education, 179, 104407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazou, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2022). Computer-mediated communication for collaborative learning in distance education environments. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 265–274). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. Y., Chan, C. K., & Van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 57–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D. (2022). New modification to Toulmin model as an analytical framework for argumentative essays. In International conference on AI logic and applications (pp. 211–224). Springer Nature Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund Dean, K., & Wright, S. (2017). Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture-based classes. Higher Education, 74(4), 651–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, H., Hoekstra, R., Brouwer, J., & Strijbos, J. W. (2020). Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: A reflection on current assessment methods in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1222–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. H., Chen, P. Q., Sin, Z. P., Jia, Y., Li, R. C., Baciu, G., et al. (2023). From classroom to Metaverse: A study on Gamified constructivist teaching in higher education. In International conference on web-based learning (pp. 92–106). Springer Nature Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A., & Green, B. J. (2024). Wisdom in the age of AI education. In Postdigital science and education (pp. 1–23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Lu, S. Y. (2020). Postmonolingual critical thinking: Internationalising higher education through students' languages and knowledge. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, F., & Zou, D. (2022). Technology-enhanced collaborative language learning: Theoretical foundations, technologies, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1754–1788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S. (2021). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troussas, C., Giannakas, F., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2023). Collaborative activities recommendation based on students' collaborative learning styles using ANN and WSM. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfa, A. R. M., Nyachwaya, J., & Roehrig, G. (2018). The influences of group dialog on individual student understanding of science concepts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Knight, S., & Shum, S. B. (2021). Collaborative learning analytics. In International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 425–443).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students' argumentative writing based on Toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhoc, K. C., Webster, B. J., King, R. B., Li, J. C., & Chung, T. S. (2019). Higher education student engagement scale (HESES): Development and psychometric evidence. Research in Higher Education, 60, 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Marxism, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Beijing, 611731, China

    Youchang Lin

  2. Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany

    Yu-Chen Hsu

  3. School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Xiling Wu

Authors
  1. Youchang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Chen Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiling Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiling Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, author-ship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Hsu, YC. & Wu, X. From Theory to Practice: Role-Playing and Knowledge Building in Digital Learning Environments. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02156-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02156-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation