Skip to main content
Log in

Trade Diversion and Creation Effect of Free Trade Agreements in ASEAN: Do Institutions Matter?

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of free trade agreements (FTAs) over the last three decades and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has since greatly embraced the development. However, research on the effect of trade agreements on trade in the Southeast Asia region has not received adequate attention. The few studies conducted on the issue fail to account for the heterogeneity of the FTA effects and the role of the quality of domestic economic and political institutions in shaping the effects. Therefore, this study evaluates the role of institutions vis-a-vis the trade diversion and creation effects of the FTAs on trade flow in ASEAN over the period 2000–2018. The study accounts for FTA endogeneity and multilateral resistance terms by estimating a structural gravity model using Poison pseudo-maximum likelihood with a high-dimensional fixed effect (PPMLHDFE). The findings reveal that the inclusion of the indicators of political and economic institutions into the specification significantly changed the magnitudes of the trade creation and diversion effects of FTA on international and intra-ASEAN trade. And, the effects of the quality of institutions are robust to the different trade flows (total trade, exports, and imports) of the ASEAN economies. Therefore, we conclude that the trade diversion and creation effects of the FTAs on trade flows in ASEAN largely depend on the quality of economic and political institutions in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be provided on request.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation: Reply. American Economic Review, 102(6), 3077–3110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnosteva, D. E., Anderson, J. E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2014). Intra-national trade costs: Measurement and aggregation (No. w19872). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Alhassan, A., & Kilishi, A. A. (2019). Weak economic institutions in Africa: A destiny or design? International Journal of Social Economics, 46(7), 904–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhassan, A., & Payaslioglu, C. (2019). Institutions and bilateral trade in Africa: An application of Poisson’s estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects to structural gravity model. Applied Economics Letters, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1682112

  • Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2016). Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002. Journal of International Economics, 99, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, N., Hossain, B., & Mowlah, I. (2018). Does the quality of political institutions affect intra-industry trade within trade blocs? The ASEAN Perspective. Applied Economics, 50(33), 3560–3574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2009). Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Mariutto, R. (2014). Economic determinants of free trade agreements revisited: Distinguishing sources of interdependence. Review of International Economics, 22(1), 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, S. L., Yotov, Y. V., & Zylkin, T. (2019). On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration. Journal of International Economics, 116, 206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloc, M. (2006). Institutions and international trade: A reconsideration of comparative advantage. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N. (1995). US Trade Policy: The infatuation with free trade areas. In J. Bhagwati & A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The dangerous drift to preferential trade agreements (pp. 1–18). The AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buterin, V., Škare, M., & Buterin, D. (2017). Macroeconomic model of institutional reforms’ influence on economic growth of the new EU members and the Republic of Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 1572–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campi, M., & Dueñas, M. (2019). Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade. Research Policy, 48(3), 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, I. H., & Wall, H. J. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, (Jan), 49–63.

  • Correia, S., Guimarães, P., & Zylkin, T. (2019). PPMLHDFE: Fast poison estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.01690.

  • Dai, M., Yotov, Y. V., & Zylkin, T. (2014). On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economics Letters, 122(2), 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, T. N., & Xing, Y. (2018). Trade efficiency, free trade agreements and rules of origin. Journal of Asian Economics, 55, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P. H., & Nigai, S. (2015). Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained ANOVA-type estimation of gravity models. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P., & Larch, M. (2008). Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2019). EU trade agreements implementation annual report. retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_19_6074

  • Feenstra, R. C. (2016). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton university press.

  • Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of international economics, 4, 131–195. Elsevier.

  • Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. MIT press.

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. L. (2001). Toward a geography of trade costs. Available at SSRN 160533.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2016). General equilibrium trade policy analysis with structural gravity.

  • Larch, M., Wanner, J., Yotov, Y. V., & Zylkin, T. (2019). Currency unions and trade: A PPML re-assessment with high-dimensional fixed effects. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 487–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., & Shin, K. (2006). Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood, M. (2019). New evidence on income and the geographical distribution of imports: The case of audiovisuals. Journal of Comparative Economics.

  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.

  • Missios, P., Saggi, K., & Yildiz, H. M. (2016). External trade diversion, exclusion incentives and the nature of preferential trade agreements☆. Journal of International Economics, 99, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, M., & Urata, S. (2014). The impact of AFTA on intra-AFTA trade. Journal of Asian Economics, 35, 12–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivero, M. P., & Yotov, Y. V. (2012). Dynamic gravity: Endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics/revue Canadienne D’économique, 45(1), 64–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osabuohien, E. S., Beecroft, I., & Efobi, U. R. (2018). Global trade and trade protection in a globalised world. Transnational Corporations Review, 10(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. K. (2004a). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review, 94(1), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. K. (2004b). Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy? Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, K. N., & Swenson, D. L. (2019). Trade diversion and trade deficits: The case of the Korea-US free trade agreement. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 52, 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos Silva, J., & Tenreyro, S. (2010). On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression. Economics Letters, 107(2), 310–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, P., & Rana, A. T. (2017). Do preferential trade agreements contribute to the development of trade? Taking into account the institutional heterogeneity. International Economics, 149, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüle, U., & Kleisinger, T. (2016). The “Spaghetti Bowl”: A case study on processing rules of origin and rules of cumulation (No. 2/2016). UASM Discussion Paper Series.

  • Soeng, R., & Cuyvers, L. (2018). Domestic institutions and export performance: Evidence for Cambodia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 27(4), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabakis, C., & Zanardi, M. (2019). Preferential trade agreements and antidumping protection. Journal of International Economics, 121, 103246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D. (2004). The long and short of the Canada-US free trade agreement. American Economic Review, 94(4), 870–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1950). The customs union issue (Carnegie Endowment for Peace). Viner the Customs Union Issue 1950.

  • World Trade Organization. (2019). WTO Annual Report.

  • Yotov, Y. V., Piermartini, R., & Larch, M. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. WTO iLibrary.

  • Zeynalov, A. (2017). The gravity of institutions in a resource-rich country: The case of Azerbaijan. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulkareem Alhassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alhassan, A., Payaslioğlu, C. Trade Diversion and Creation Effect of Free Trade Agreements in ASEAN: Do Institutions Matter?. J Knowl Econ 15, 917–935 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01108-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01108-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation