Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-linear Threshold Effect of Governance Quality on Economic Growth in African Countries: Evidence from Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 August 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between governance quality and economic growth for 54 African countries over the period 1996–2019. The panel smooth threshold regression (PSTR) model was applied to determine the optimal level of global governance index, which, once attained, will induce the positive impact of governance quality on economic growth. Results proved that the nexus between governance quality and economic growth is non-linear. Besides, it showed that there exists a statistically positive relationship between governance quality and economic growth above the threshold level of 0.2, above which governance quality starts increasing the GDP per capita growth rate in African countries. The findings revealed, too, that the impact of other macroeconomic variables on economic growth has improved once global governance index reaches a threshold level of 0.2. Finally, it was found that only 6 out of 54 African countries have a global governance index above the threshold of 0.2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Please contact corresponding author for data requests.

Change history

Notes

  1. Conduct Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit-root tests on each panel.

  2. Conduct Phillips-Perron unit-root tests on each panel.

  3. IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change Working Group II), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Published for the International Panel on Climate Change, 2007.

References

  • Abdelbary, I., & Benhin, J. (2019). Governance, capital and economic growth in the Arab Region. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 73, 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akisik, O., Gal, G., & Mangaliso, M. P. (2020). IFRS, FDI, economic growth and human development: The experience of Anglophone and Francophone African countries. Emerging Markets Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. R., Kitenge, E., & Bedane, B. (2017). Government effectiveness and economic growth. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Ozler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro, L., Areendam, C., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of the financial markets. Journal of Intemational Economics, 64(1), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleyne, D., & Edwards, S. (2011). Threshold effects in the relationship between inward foreign direct investment and import productivity growth in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 1727–9917). United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arawatari, R., Hori, T., & Mino, K. (2018). On the nonlinear relationship between inflation and growth: A theoretical exposition. Journal of Monetary Economics, 94, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P., & Nair, M. (2021). Uncovering interlinks among ICT connectivity and penetration, trade openness, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: The case of the G-20 countries. Telematics and Informatics, 60, 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan, R. U., Akhtar, T., Rahim, S., Sher, F., & Cheema, A. R. (2018). Governance, corruption and economic growth: A panel data analysis of selected Saarc countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 56(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azam, J. P., Berthélemy, J. C., & Calipel, S. (1996). Risque politique et croissance en Afrique. Revue Économique, 47(3), 819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M., & Osbat, C. (2005). Testing for PPP: Should we use panel methods? Empirical Economics, 30, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batrancea, L., Rathnaswamy, M. M., Batrancea, I., Nichita, A., & Rus, M,-I., Tulai, H., Fatacean, G., Masca, E.S., & Morar, I.D. (2020). Adjusted net savings of CEE and Baltic nations in the context of sustainable economic growth: A panel data analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(10), 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B. A., & Wang, M.G. (2005). Inappropriate polling of wealthy and poor countries in empirical FDI studies. In Does foreign direct investment promote economic development ? ed. Theodore H. Moran, Edward M, Graham, and Magnus Blomström. Washington : Institute for International Economics and Center for Global Development.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J. (2001). Rank test for nonlinear cointegration. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500101681019981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., del Barrio-Castro, T., & Lopez-Bazo, E. (2005). Breaking the panels: An application to GDP per capita. Econometrics Journal, 8(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christidou, M., & Panagiotidis, T. (2010). Purchasing power parity and the European single currency: Some new evidence. Economic Modelling, 27(5), 1116–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. P. (2020). Do survey joiners and leavers differ from regular participants? The US SPF GDP growth and inflation forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.003

  • Dzhumashev, R. (2014). Corruption and growth: The role of governance, public spending, and economic development. Economic Modelling, 37, 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emara, N., & El Said, A. (2021). Financial inclusion and economic growth: The role of governance in selected MENA countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 75, 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayissa, B., & Nsiah, C. (2013). The impact of governance on economic growth in Africa. Journal of Developing Areas, 47(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetahi-Vehapi, M., Sadiku, L., & Petkovski, M. (2015). Empirical analysis of the effects of trade openness on economic growth: An evidence for South East European Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00004-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1992). Statistical methods for research workers. In: Kotz S., Johnson N.L. (eds) Break throughs in Statistics. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_6

  • Ford, J. L., Sen, S., & Wei, H. X. (2010). A simultaneous equation model of economic growth, FDI and government policy in China. Department of Economics Discussion Paper, pp1–48.

  • Fraj, S. H., Hamdaoui, M., & Maktouf, S. (2018). Governance and economic growth: The role of the exchange rate regime. International Economics, 156, 326–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and U.S. foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 19–39.

  • Gonz´alez, A., Teräsvirta, T., & Dijk, D. V. (2005). Panel smooth transition regression models, Technical report, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance. 604, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 11 Oct 2017.

  • Granger, C. W., & Terasvirta, T. (1995). Modelling non-linear economic relationships. Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 1241–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdok, A. (2001). Governance and policy in Africa, WIDER Discussion Paper, No. 2001/126, ISBN 9291900753, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki.

  • Hammudeh, S., Sohag, K., Husain, S., Husaine, H., & Said, J. (2020). Nonlinear relationship between economic growth and nuances of globalisation with income stratification: Roles of financial development and governance. Economic Systems, 44(3), 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica, 64(2), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. D. F., & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels where the Time Dimension is Fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Financial Development and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Studies, 40(1), 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M., & McGillivray, M. (2020). Wealth inequality, governance and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 88, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The world governance indicators: A summary of methodology, data and analytical issues” World Bank Policy Research Paper. No. 5430.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance matters IV: Governance indicators for 1996–2004. World Bank Policy Research Paper. No., 3630, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Aggregating governance indicators. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper No.2196, p.39.

  • Kervin, J.B. (1992). Methods for Business Research, New York. Kindleberger, C. (1969). American Business Abroad. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H., Wu, Y. C., & Lin, S. C. (2018). Heterogeneity in the effects of government size and governance on economic growth. Economic Modelling, 68, 205–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu., C.S.J. (2002). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., & Terasvirta, T. (1988). Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika, 75(3), 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandeya, S. M. T., & Ho, S.-Y. (2021). Inflation, inflation uncertainty and the economic growth nexus: An impact study of South Africa. MethodsX, 8, 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengistus, B., & Adams, S. (2007). FDI, governance and economic development in developing countries. The Journal of Social, Political and Economics Studies, 32(2), 213–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. R., & Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panel with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo, P. K. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morvillier, F. (2019). Do currency undervaluations affect the impact of inflation on growth? Economic Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics., 44(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. T. K. (2017). The long run and short run impacts of foreign direct investment and export on economic growth of Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 7(5), 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikawa, K., & Ueda, K. (2018). The optimal inflation rate under Schumpeterian growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raheem, D. I., & Oyinlola, M. A. (2013). Foreign direct investment, governance and economic growth trilogy: New evidence from ECOWAS countries. Journal of Global and Science Issues, 1(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saidi, H., Rachdi, H., & Mgadmi, N. (2017). Revisiting the role of governance and institutions in the impact of financial liberalization on economic growth using the PSTR model. Panoeconomicus, 64(3), 315–336.

  • Setayesh, M. H., & Daryaei, A. A. (2017). Good governance, innovation, economic growth and the stock market turnover rate. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(7), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1334809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., Leybourne, S., Kim, T. H., & Newbold, P. (2004). More powerful panel unit root tests with an application to the mean reversion in real exchange rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi, E., & Mohan, R. (2010). Institutions and poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 46(6), 1047–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh, S. D., Hart, N., & Canh, N. P. (2020). Public spending, public governance and economic growth at the Vietnamese provincial level: A disaggregate analysis. Economic Systems, 44(4), 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., Dailami, M., Dhareshwar, A., Kaufmann, D., Kishor, N., López, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2000). The quality of growth. Ekistics. 66, (394/395/396), 13–20.

  • Vinayagathasan, T., & Ramesh, R. (2019). Do governance indicators matter for economic growth? The case of Sri Lanka. The Indian journal of public administration, 65(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556119844616

  • World Bank. (2021). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator

  • Worldwide Governance Indicators. (2021). https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governanceindicators

  • Wu, W., & Davis, O. A. (1999). The two freedoms, economic growth and development: An empirical study. Public Choice, 100(1/2), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018375926386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuo, Z., Musaad, A. S., Muhammad, B., & Khan, S. (2021). Underlying the relationship between governance and economic growth in developed countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(13), 1314–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00658-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anis Ochi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Third author "Mohamed Ali Labidi" change of affiliation from "Faculty of Law, Economics and Management of Jendouba, University of Jendouba, Jendouba, Tunisa" to "Carthage High Commercial Studies Institute, University of Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia".

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ochi, A., Saidi, Y. & Labidi, M.A. Non-linear Threshold Effect of Governance Quality on Economic Growth in African Countries: Evidence from Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach. J Knowl Econ 14, 4707–4729 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01084-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01084-w

Keywords

JEL Classification Codes

Navigation