Abstract
We propose a computational model of the quadruple helix innovation ecosystem as a disruptive innovation cause. The proposal holds on twofold: quantum computation and the ecosystem dynamics, which causes disruptive innovations. Harnessing disruptive innovations’ dynamics in an innovation ecosystem is theoretically explained based on the Dirac–Solow–Swan model to describe the ecosystem’s capital accumulations. The quantum perspective of the capital accumulation in the disruption leads to the hyperfine splitting of capital due to the Christensen effect and, therefore, the excitation of disruption factors (capital, technology, and labor) happens from the old status into the new industry of disruption. The capital dynamics junction occurs due to the Christensen effect, post symmetry breaking of the market. We show that the harnessing of disruptions depends on the expansion factor of ecosystem agent capital accumulation on incumbent equations.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.








Notes
The branch of capital dynamics from \(t=0 \rightarrow t<0\) is not taken into account.
References
Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth (Princeton University Press).
Acemoglu, D., & Cao, D. (2015). Journal of Economic Theory, 157, 255.
Adner, R. (2002). Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 667.
Bohm, D. (2012). Quantum theory (Courier Corporation)
Boianovsky, M., et al. (2009). History of Political Economy, 41(1), 1.
Bower, J. L., Christensen, C. M. (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave (Harvard Business Review Video)
Burgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (1996). California management review, 38(2), 8.
Bucci, A., & Guerrini, L. (2009). The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 9, 1.
Carayannis, E. G. (2004). International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1(1–2), 49.
Carayannis, E. G., & Provance, M. (2008). International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 90.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). International journal of technology management, 46(3–4), 201.
Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Foresight and STI Governance, 10, 1.
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). R&D Management, 48(1), 148.
Christensen, C. M. (2006). Journal of Product innovation management, 23(1), 39.
Christensen, C. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail (Harvard Business Review Press).
Christensen, D., Clayton, M., Raynor, M. E., McDonald, R. (2015). Harvard Business Review pp. 44–53.
Cusumano, M. A. (2015). Communications of the ACM, 58(1), 32.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). Research policy, 29(2), 109.
Dechter, R., Pearl, J. (1988). In Search in artificial intelligence (Springer) pp. 370–425.
Gartner. (2014). Hype Cycle Special Report, 1.
Heinrich, E. (2014). Telecom companies count $386 billion in lost revenue to whatsapp. http://fortune.com/2014/06/23/telecom-companies-count-386-billion-in-lost-revenue-to-skype-whatsapp-others/.
Kempe, J., Kitaev, A., & Regev, O. (2006). SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(5), 1070.
Kumar, V. (1992). AI magazine, 13(1), 32.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). Science and public policy, 25(3), 195.
Nielsen, M., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. (2002). American Journal of Physics, 70, 558.
Nonneman, W., & Vanhoudt, P. (1996). The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 943.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The journal of economic perspectives, 8(1), 3.
Solow, R. M. (1956). The quarterly journal of economics pp. 65–94.
Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic record, 32(2), 334.
Trisetyarso, A. (2010). Journal of Mathematical Physics, 51(7), 072103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3458598, http://link.aip.org/link/?JMP/51/072103/1.
Trisetyarso, A. (2012). Quantum Information & Computation, 2(11–12), 0989.
Trisetyarso, A., Hastiadi, F. F. (2018). In 2018 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD) (IEEE) pp. 1–4.
Trisetyarso, A., Hastiadi, F. F. (2019). In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems (Springer) pp. 552–561.
Acknowledgements
AT and FFH thank to Professor Emil Salim for suggestions and discussions. The research is supported financially by the FEB UI grant of multidisciplinary research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trisetyarso, A., Hastiadi, F.F. Computational Model of Quadruple Helix Innovations Ecosystem. J Knowl Econ 14, 314–326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00865-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00865-z