Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Foreign Aid-Growth Nexus in Africa: Do Institutions Matter?

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to investigate the institution’s role on amelioration of the effectiveness of foreign aid in two subregions: 25 low-income and 23 middle-income African economies. To do this, we estimate an OLS (ordinary least squares), FMOLS (fully modified ordinary least squares), and SGMM (system generalized method of moments) models. Yearly data from 48 African provinces in a panel framework for the period 1996–2014 has been used. The evidence reveals that both in short- and long-run results confirm that foreign aid is not effective in terms of economic growth and with increasing returns. In addition, aid ineffectiveness is more important in the low-income African countries than in the middle-income African countries. But, the aid effectiveness is promoted with the presence of good institutions. In this case, the analysis evidence finds that foreign aid is more effective in two subregions. About the six institutional dimensions, the pertinent governance indicators that ameliorate aid effectiveness are Rule and Laws, Government Effectiveness, and Voice and Accountability, in low-income countries. However, all institutional indicators, except Rule and Laws, ameliorate aid effectiveness in middle-income countries. The long-run aid effectiveness is promoted by Government Effectiveness and Voice and Accountability, in low-income countries. But, in middle-income countries, aid effectiveness can be ameliorated, especially, by Political Stability and Regulatory Quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf, handbook of economic growth, volume 1A. Chapter, 6, 385–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N., Du, L., Lu, J., Wang, J., Li, H., & Zaffar, M. (2017). Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: Is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy, 123, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N., Du, L., Tian, XL. et al. Qual Quant (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0755-0, Chinese growth and dilemmas: Modelling energy consumption, CO2 emissions and growth in China.

  • Ali, A. E. H. (2013). Foreign aid and economic growth in Egypt: A cointegration analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3), 743–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano. M and Bond. S (1991), Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277-297

  • Arellano. M and Bover. O (1995), Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics, vol.68, pp.29-51

  • Arellano, C., Bulír, A., Lane, T., & Lipschitz, L. (2009). The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt. C, Jones. S, and Tarp. F, (2010). Aid, growth, and development: Have we come full circle? Journal of Globalization and Development Volume 1, Issue 2, Article 5.

  • Blundell. R and Bond. S (1998), Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 87, pp.115—143

  • Boone, P. (1996). Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid. European Economic Review, 40, 289–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Ahmadi-Esfahani, F. Z. (2006). Aid and growth: A study of South East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics., 17, 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside. C and Dollar. D (1997), Aid, Policies, and Growth , Policy Researc Working paper n° 1777, World Bank, Washington DC

  • Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. American Economie Review, (Septembre)., 90(n°4), 847–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens. M, Radelet. S, Bhavnani. R, Bazzi. S (2012), Counting Chickens when they Hatch: Timing and the Effects of Aid on Growth, The Economic Journal, volume. 122, pp. 590-617

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Aid, policy and growth in post-conflict societies. European Economic Review, 48.

  • Dalgaard.C, Hansen. H, Tarp. F (2004),On The Empirics of Foreign Aid and Growth, Economic Journal, Volume114, Issue496, pp. F191-F216

  • Dreher, A., Eichenauer, V., & Gehring, K. (2016). Geopolitics, aid and growth: The impact of UN security council membership on the effectiveness of aid. World Bank Economic Review, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2003):“Can foreign aid buy growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.17.

  • Emara, N., Plotkin, D., & Stein, A. (2013). Foreign aid and growth in Egypt: The role of economic policy. Journal of Business and Economics, 4(11), 1170–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny. S and Bazoumana. O (2009), What type of economic growth does foreign aid support?, Applied Economics Letters, vol. 16, pp. 727-730

  • Feyzioglu T, Swaroop V, Zhu M, 1998 «A panel data analysis of the fungibility of foreign aid », World Bank Economic Review 12.

  • Galiani. S, Knack. S, Xu. L, Zou. B. (2016) The Effect of Aid on Growth: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment, Journal of Economic Growth, volume 22, p.1–33

  • Galiani, S., Knack, S., Xu, L. C., & Zou, B. (2017). The effect of aid on growth: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Growth, 22(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, L., & Zou, H. F. (2001). Foreign aid reduces labor supply and capital accumulation. Review of Development Economics, 5(1), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounder, R. (2001). Aid-growth nexus: Empirical evidence from Fiji. Applied Economics., 33, 1009–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. and F. Tarp (2001), « Aid and growth regressions », Journal of Development Economics, vol.64, p.547–570

  • Im,K.S ,Pesaran,M.H.,and Shin, Y.(2003). “ testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels“, Journal of Econometrics,115,53-74

  • Juselius, F.-M., & Tarp, F. (2014). The long-run impact of foreign aid in 36 African countries: Insights from multivariate time series analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao. C and Chiang. M.H. (2000), Non-Linear Effect of Remittances on Banking Sector Development: Panel Evidence from Developing Countries,Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol.6 No.5, pp. 161-178

  • Karras, G. (2006). Foreign aid and long-run economic growth: Empirical evidence for a panel of developing countries. Journal of International Development, 18, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel & Aart Kraay & Pablo Zoido (1999). “Governance Matters”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. 2014. The Worldwide Governance Indicators methodology and analytical issues. Working Paper no.5430. World Bank Policy Research Department, Washington, https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp.

  • Kumar Tiwari, A., & Kalita, M. (2011). Governance and foreign aid in ASIAN countries. Economics Bulletin, 31(1), 453–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties“, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24

  • Matthijs Lof, Tseday Jemaneh Mekasha, and Finn Tarp. (2013). “Aid and income: Another timeseries perspective”, Working Paper No. 2013/069 Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

  • Mallik. (2008). Foreign Aid and economic growth: A cointegration analysis of the six poorest African countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(2), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray. M, Mavrotas. G, Addison. T, (2005), Development assistance and development finance: evidence and global policy agendas, Journal of International Development, volume. 17, pp. 819-836

  • McGillivray. M, Feeny. S, Hermes. N, and Lensink. R (2006), Controversies over the impact of development aid: it works; it doesn't; it can, but that depends…, Journal of International Development, vol. 18, pp.1031-1050

  • Minasyan, Anna, Peter Nunnenkamp and Katharina Richert, (2016). “Does aid effectiveness depend on the quality of donors?”, working paper 2046, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

  • Minoiu, C., & Sanjay, G. R. (2010). Development aid and economic growth: A positive long-run relation. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, R. (2013). Foreign aid and economic growth: A cointegration test for Cambodia. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(2), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, R and Hossain, M, (2013) “Foreign aid and economic growth in Philippines”, Economics Bulletin,Vol 33, Issue 3.

  • Moolio, P., & Kong, S. (2016). Foreign aid and economic growth: Panel cointegration analysis for Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam. Athens Journal of Business and Economics, 2(4), 417–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndambendia, H., & Njoupouognigni, M. (2010). Foreign aid, foreign direct investment and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from pooled mean group estimator (PMG). International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni. P (2000), Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels, No 2000-03, Department of Economics Working Papers, 10.1007/s13132-020-00638-0 Department of Economics, Williams College Pedroni. P (2001), Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels, Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 83, iss. 4, pp. 727-31

  • Raghuram, R., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show? Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., & Fagernas, S. (2004). The fiscal effects of aid in Uganda. In ESAU working paper 9. London: Economics and Statistics Analysis Unit, Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2004):“The anarchy of numbers: Aid, development, and crosscountry empirics.” Center for Global Development, Washington.

  • Saci, K., Giorgioni, G., and Holden, K. (2009), Does Financial Development Affect Growth? Applied Economics, 41, 1701–1707.

  • Sothan. S (2017). “Foreign aid and economic growth: evidence from Cambodia”, the journal of international trade & economic development, ©Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Stock, J., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vector in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 6, 783–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiba. S, Frikha. M, (2018), Africa Is Rich, Africans Are Poor! A Blessing or Curse: An Application of Cointegration Techniques, Journal of Knowledge Economy, pp1-26.

  • World Bank (2013), Jobs, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11843 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.

  • Yahyaoui I and Bouchoucha N (2018), “Does aid enhance growth?”, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/91093/ MPRA Paper No. 91093, posted 3 January 2019 09:33 UTC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismahene Yahyaoui.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

$$ {\boldsymbol{INSTITUTION}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}={\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{1}}{\boldsymbol{CC}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}+{\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{2}}{\boldsymbol{GE}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}+{\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{3}}{\boldsymbol{PS}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}+{\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{4}}{\boldsymbol{QR}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}+{\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{5}}{\boldsymbol{RL}}_{\boldsymbol{i}}+{\boldsymbol{\mu}}_{\mathbf{6}}{\boldsymbol{VA}}_{\boldsymbol{i}} $$
(3)

with

 

Low-income African countries

Middle-income African countries

μ 1

0,8260

0,9410

μ 2

0,8570

0,9430

μ 3

0,8100

0,7990

μ 4

0,8810

0,9080

μ 5

0,9410

0,9610

μ 6

0,7620

0,8670

Appendix 2

Table 7 Governance dimensions correlation analysis in low-income countries
Table 8 Governance dimensions correlation analysis in middle-income countries

Appendix 3. List of countries

Middle-income African countries

Low-income African countries

Afrique du Sud

Mauritanie

Bénin

Mali

Angola

Namibie

Burkina Faso

Mozambique

Botswana

Nigéria

Burundi

Niger

Cabo Verde

Sao Tomé-et-Principe

Comores

Ouganda

Cameroun

Sénégal

Congo, République démocratique du

République centrafricaine

Congo, République du

Sudan

Ethiopie

Rwanda

Côte d’Ivoire

Swaziland

Gambie

Sierra Leone

Gabon

Zambie

Guinée

Tanzani

Ghana

Tunisia

Guinée-Bissau

Tchad

Kenya

Maroc

Libéria

Togo

Lesotho

Egypt

Madagascar

Zimbabwe

Maurice

Algérie

Malawi

 

Libye

   

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yahyaoui, I., Bouchoucha, N. Foreign Aid-Growth Nexus in Africa: Do Institutions Matter?. J Knowl Econ 11, 1663–1689 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00638-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00638-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation