Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supervisor Effects on Employee Knowledge Sharing Behaviour in SMEs

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite many studies on abusive supervisors in the organisation and management sciences, very little is known about their influence on employee knowledge sharing. Though the literature finds evidence of abusive supervision in big firms, the existing body of literature studying abusive supervision in SMEs is sparse. This study examines the influence of abusive behaviour by supervisors on their employees’ knowledge-sharing practices. We attempt to determine whether the quality or quantity of the knowledge shared is affected. Using a multiple mediation factor analysis, this study suggests that co-worker support and organisational support mediate the effect of abusive supervision on employees’ knowledge-sharing behaviours. The results obtained from 165 supervisors to subordinate dyads from 49 SMEs reveal that abusive supervision negatively affects employees’ quality and quantity of knowledge-sharing behaviour. Further, the implications and limitations of the study are presented with promising avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). Prevalence of destructive managership behavior. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand and Walsh (2015). Empirical analysis of factors influencing knowledge sharing facilities and barriers in Indian SMEs – a comparative case study, European Conference on Knowledge management conference proceedings, Udine, Italy.

  • Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Moderator- mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

  • Beaver, G., & Jennings, P. (2005). Competitive advantage and owner-managerial power. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: a qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of ex- trinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.

  • Boddy, C. R. (2011). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 367–379.

  • Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L. E., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS), trait version. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 84(58), 822–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. (Yi-Ju) (2009) The relationship between work and non-work support and work-life balance in Taiwan 1994: 153. http://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz

  • Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as a moderator. Information and Management, 48(1), 9–18.

  • Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analysis, in Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

  • Connelly, H. S., & Kelloway, E. K. (2012). Reducing the adverse consequences of workplace aggression and violence: the buffering effects of organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2003(8), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

  • Cohen, S., & Kaimenakis, N. (2007). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledgeintensive SMEs. Learning Organization, 14(3), 241–262.

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352–364.

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K. C., & Awazu, Y. (2006). Knowledge management at SMEs: five peculiarities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 32–43.

  • Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counter productivity in organizations: a longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A. and Winklhofer, H. M (2001). Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durdyev, S., Ihtiyar, A., Banaitis, A., & Thurnell, D. (2018). The construction client satisfaction model: a PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 24(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565–573.

  • Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 787–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eser G and Ensari, M. Ş. (2016). The effect of knowledge sharing behavior of supervisor on employees’ fear of losing value regarding knowledge sharing: the mediating role of organizational support. Journal of Business Research Turk 8(2) 134–151

  • Eze, U. C., Hah, S. F., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2013). Knowledge sharing among employees in the manufacturing SMEs. Enterprise Development in SMEs and Entrepreneurial Firms: Dynamic Processes, 114–132.

  • Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K. (2004): Analyse von Strukturgleichungsmodellen mit Hilfe der Partial-Least-Squares (PLS)-Methode, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 64. Jg., H 6, S. 714–738.

  • Haar, J. M., & Spell, C. S. (2004). Programme knowledge and value of work-family practices and organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1040–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haar, J. M., de Fluiter, A. and Brougham, D. (2016). Abusive supervision and turnover intentions: the mediating role of perceived organisational support. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(02) p 139–153.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage available at: www.amazon.de/Partial-Squares-Structural-Equation-Modeling/dp/148337744X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1462617386&sr=8-1&keywords=PLS-sem#reader_148337744X. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

  • Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: the neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding super- visor-targeted aggression: a within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 731–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiacheng, W., Liu, L., & Calabrese, F. A. (2010). A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 30(3), 220–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatepe, O. M. (2012). The effects of coworker and perceived organizational support on hotel employee outcomes: The moderating role of job embeddedness. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36(4), 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2015). The effect of coworker knowledge sharing on performance and its boundary conditions: an interactional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 575–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. L., Kim, M., and Yun, S. (2015). Knowledge sharing, abusive supervision, and support: a social exchange perspective. Group & Organization Management.

  • Kim, S. L., Lee, S., & Yun, S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(6), 1106–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work – family conflict construct definitions and linkage. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2018). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. Leadership Quarterly, 29, 403–413

  • Lin, C. P. (2007). To share or not to share: modelling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M.-J. J., & Chen, C.-J. (2008). Integration and knowledge sharing: transforming to long term competitive advantage. International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 16(1/2), 83–108.

  • Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S120–S137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, M., Handley, K., Bagnoli, C., & Dumay, J. (2016). Knowledge management in small and medium enterprises: a structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 258–291.

  • Meglich, P. A., & Eesley, D. T. (2011). A bully in its own China shop: risk factors for abusive supervision in small firms. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. J., & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication flows in distribution channels: impact on assessments of communication quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 71(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murari, K. (2013). Abusive managership – a barrier to employee empowerment. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 8–21 Retrieved from http://www.iiste.Org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/4462. Accessed Jan 2018

  • Ngah, R., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Tacit knowledge sharing and SMEs ’ organizational performance. International Journal Of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 216–220.

  • Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, J. M. L. (2011). Effects of abusive supervision and coworker support on work engagement. 2nd International Conference on Economics, Business and Management, 22, 65–70.

  • Rayner, C., Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. (2002). Workplace bullying: what we know, who is to blame and what can we do? London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.

  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36, iii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: Smart-PLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed Dec 2017

  • Schat, A. C. H., Desmarais, S., & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Exposure to workplace aggression from multiple sources. Validation of a measure and test of a model. Unpublished Manuscript. McMaster University, Hamilton.

  • Schaubroeck, J., & Jones, J. R. (2000). Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighi, M., van-Splunter, S., Brazier, F., van Beers, C., & Lukosch, S. (2016). Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation : the roles of perceived benefits and costs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1247–1267.

  • Sergeeva, A., & Andreeva, T. (2016). Knowledge Sharing Research : Bringing Context Back In. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(3), 240–261.

  • Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: the roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 158–168.

  • Sloan, M. M. (2011). Unfair treatment in the workplace and worker well-being: the role of coworker support in a service work environment. Work and Occupations, 39(1), 3–34.

  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering managership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.

  • Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 9–27.

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.

  • Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289.

  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationships between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974–983.

  • Thomas, G. F., Zolin, R., & Hartman, J. L. (2009). The central role of communication in developing trust and its effect on employee involvement. Journal of Business Communication, 46(3), 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115–131.

  • Wang, G., Harms, P. D., & Mackey, J. D. (2014). Does it take two to tangle? Subordinates??? Perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 487–503.

  • Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–58.

  • Woo, B., & Chelladurai, P. (2012). Dynamics of perceived support and work attitudes: the case of fitness club employees. Human Resource Management Research, 2(1), 6–18.

  • Wu, W.-L., & Lee, Y.-C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 154–168.

  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076.

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

  • Zonooz, B., Vahid, H., Mohammad, S., & Lotfali, B. (2011). The relationship between knowledge transfer and competitiveness in “ SMES ” with emphasis on absorptive capacity and combinative capabilities. International Business and Management, 2(1), 59–85.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KTO Research Centre, SKEMA Business School, Universitie Cote d’Azur, GREDEG, 157, Rue Albert Einstein, CS30085, Valbonne, France

    Amitabh Anand

  2. SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d’Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Audrey Dalmasso

Authors
  1. Amitabh Anand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Audrey Dalmasso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amitabh Anand.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 7 Table 3
Full size table

Appendix – B

Table 4 Descriptive statistics—models 1 and 3 (quality of knowledge sharing)
Full size table
Table 5 Descriptive statistics—models 2 and 4 (quantity of knowledge sharing)
Full size table

Appendix -C

Table 6 Classification of SMEs in India
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anand, A., Dalmasso, A. Supervisor Effects on Employee Knowledge Sharing Behaviour in SMEs. J Knowl Econ 11, 1430–1453 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00604-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00604-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation