Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

High-Growth Business Creation and Management: a Multivariate Quantitative Approach Using GEM Data

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is defined as the effort to generate and create jobs and innovate leading to economic growth. Despite the importance that has been given to this phenomenon, inequalities regarding the ability to trigger and manage the entrepreneurial activity remain. This research aims to describe and account for the entrepreneurship levels, particularly in order to understand what leads certain countries’ individuals to display higher levels of initiative to manage or create a high-growth business. In order to achieve this goal, a research program that includes annual assessments of entrepreneurial activity levels in several countries has been used—The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), which is, currently, one of the main international research databases aiming to describe, analyse and compare the entrepreneurial process in a wide range of countries. The database studied in this work is the 2011 NES, containing 144 variables in which 136 are qualitative (97 ordinal qualitative and 39 nominal qualitative). The data were analysed transforming the ordinal qualitative variables in ordinal quantitative, where the answers were given in a Likert scale from 1 to 5. The sample of the database consists of 1852 national and regional entrepreneurship experts selected on the basis of reputation and experience (through a convenience sample approach). Our research used several multivariate analysis techniques, in particular the multiple linear regression analysis, the cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis. In general, our conclusions suggest that individuals who react quickly to opportunities seem to display better abilities of time management and are more willing to start a business. Our results also show that the national culture does not influence the individual ability of managing the personal life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, C., Urbano, D., & Amorós, J. E. (2014). GEM research: achievements and challenges. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 445–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., & Amoro’s, J. E. (2013). GEM research: achievements and challenges. JEL.

  • Álvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2006). Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women’s self-employment preference in the Nordic countries. International Small Business Journal.

  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H., Mueller, S., & Schrettle, T. (2013). The use of global entrepreneurship monitor data in academic research: a critical inventory and future potentials. Entrepreneurial Venturing.

  • Calvo, J. L. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s law for small, young and innovating firms. Small Business Economics, 26(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A. L., & Johnson, R. W. (1989). Entrepreneurship: a social psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P. K., Devinney, T. M., & Winer, R. S. (1991). The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. The Journal of Business, 64(4), 573–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, A., & Ikram, R. (2015). Does genetic proximity to high growth countries affect a country’s own growth? Economic Modelling, 51, 444–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelariu, C., Brashear, T., Osmonbekov, T., & Zait, A. (2008). Entrepreneurial propensity in a transition economy: exploring micro-level and meso-level cultural antecedents. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(6), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: a quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbenhagen, J. (2000). Successful Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Correia, A., Silva, E. C., Lopes, I., & Braga, A. (2016). MANOVA for distinguishing experts’ perceptions about entrepreneurship using NES data from GEM. AIP Conference Proceedings.

  • Crook, T. R., Shook, C. L., Morris, M. L., & Madden, T. M. (2010). Are we there yet?: an assessment of research design and construct measurement practices in entrepreneurship research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, B., & Kotey, B. (2016). Identifying high growth firms: where are we? Journal of Management & Organization, 22(4), 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. E. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Ine’galite’s Economiques. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhuys, M., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2009). High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: a quantile regression approach. Springer Science Business, 34(1), 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Unraveling the links between dimensions of innovation and organizational performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzl, W., & Friesenbichler, K. (2010). High-growth firms, innovation and the distance to the frontier. Economics Bulletin, 30(2), 1016–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2014). What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(1), 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, R. G. (2014a). O IMPACTO DO EMPREENDEDORISMO NO CRESCIMENTO ECONÓMICO: UM ESTUDO EMPÍRICO PARA OS PAÍSES DA OCDE. Faculdade de Economia do Porto: Tese de Mestrado.

  • Marques, R.G. (2014b) O impacto do empreendedorismo no crescimento económico: um estudo empírico para os países da OCDE, Faculdade de Economia do Porto: Tese de Mestrado.

  • Mason, C. and Brown, R. (2010) High Growth Firms in Scotland. Strategy, October.

  • Mason, C., Brown, R., Hart, M., & Anyadike-Danes, M. (2015a). High growth firms, jobs and peripheral regions: the case of Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, D. C., & Liedholm, C. (1998). The dynamics of micro and small enterprises in developing countries. World Development, 26(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengistae, T. (1999). Indigenous ethnicity and entrepreneurial success in Africa: some evidence from Ethiopia. WB policy research working paper.

  • Mueller, S. L., & Dato-on, M. C. (2013). A cross cultural study of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(1), 1–20.

  • Ng, P., & Hamilton, R. (2016). Experiences of high-growth technology firms in Malaysia and New Zealand. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(8), 901–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, A. (1985). On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 390–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Praag, C.M., and Versloot, P.H. (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research, Small Business.

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., Medina-Garrido, J. A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2012). Determinants of hotels and restaurants entrepreneurship: a study using GEM data. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 579–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). GEM Global 1999 Executive Report, Kansas City: Kaufman Center.

  • Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, L., & Goedhuys, M. (2000). Barriers to growth of firms in developing countries evidence from Burundi. Innovation, industry evolution and employment (pp. 297–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluis, J. V., Praag, M. V., & Vijverberg, W. (2004). Entrepreneurship selection and performance: a meta-analysis of the impact of education in less developed countries. World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 225–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, A. V., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics.

  • Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Variyam, J. N., & Kraybill, D. S. (1992). Empirical evidence on determinants of firm growth. Economics Letters, 38(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. M., Jeanes, E., & Rowlands, R. (2002). Measuring innovation—applying the literature-based innovation output indicator to public services. Public Administration, 80(1), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the FEDER component of the European Structural and Investment Funds, through the Operational Competitiveness and Internationalisation Programme’s (COMPETE 2020) Project No. 006971 (UID/SOC/04011) and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology’s (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) UID/SOC/04011/2013 Project. The authors also thank to comments given at Regional HELIX Conference 2016 – International Conference on Regional Triple Helix Dynamics. Any data or computational errors in this paper are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Innovation and Research on Business Sciences and Information Systems (CIICESI), Polytechnic of Porto, Rua do Curral, Casa do Curral, Margaride, 4610-156, Felgueiras, Portugal

    Vítor Braga, Maria Queirós, Aldina Correia & Alexandra Braga

Authors
  1. Vítor Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Queirós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aldina Correia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandra Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vítor Braga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braga, V., Queirós, M., Correia, A. et al. High-Growth Business Creation and Management: a Multivariate Quantitative Approach Using GEM Data. J Knowl Econ 9, 424–445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0490-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0490-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation