A Risk Management Approach for the Internationalization of Higher Education

Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes how higher education institutions can utilize a framework for assessing the risks associated with international expansion initiatives. It makes an argument for why borrowing risk assessment frameworks from other disciplines can also be beneficial to higher education institutions. The riskiest form of internationalization—establishing an international branch campus—is used as a benchmark for assessing risks. A risk management framework developed for managing risks associated with global megaprojects is used to analyze key decision points senior leaders at higher education institutions may want to consider when deciding to expend scarce institutional resources to pursue an international higher education project. This paper finds that risks management models borrowed from the business discipline are adaptable for a higher education context. With few risk management models available to assess the risks associated with internationalization opportunities, the authors argue that more research is needed on the topic of risk so that senior leaders can make well-informed decisions about taking on riskier international education opportunities.

Keywords

University Higher education Risk Internationalization International branch campus 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  3. Beecher, B. and Streitwieser, B. (under review). Information Sharing in the Age of Hyper Competition: Opening an International Branch Campus.Google Scholar
  4. Chalmers, I. (2011). International branch campuses and unique risk considerations. University Risk Management and Insurance Association, 33–39.Google Scholar
  5. Cross-Border Education Research Team. (2017). C-BERT Branch Campus Listing. [Data originally collected by Kevin Kinser and Jason E. Lane]. Available: http://cbert.org/branchcampuses.php. Albany, NY: Author.
  6. Cuban, L., & Shipps, D. (2000). Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Girdzijauskaite, E., & Radzeviciene, A. (2014). International branch campus: framework and strategy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Incheon Global Campus Vision Statement. (2017, January 25). Retrieved from http://www.sgu.or.kr/sgu/new_eng/intro/vision.htm
  9. Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Cavusgil, E. (2013). Managing global megaprojects: complexity and risk management. Int Bus Rev, 22(6), 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knight, J. (2006). Cross-border education: conceptual confusion and data deficits. Perspect Educ, 24(4), 15–27.Google Scholar
  11. Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: the American struggle over educational goals. Am Educ Res J, 34(1), 39–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lane, J. E., & Kinser, K. (2011a). Reconsidering privatization in cross-border engagements: the sometimes public nature of private activity. Higher Education Policy, 24(2), 255–273. doi:10.1057/hep.2011.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lane, J. E., & Kinser, K. (2011b). Multinational colleges and universities: leading, governing, and managing international branch campuses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Levin, H. M. (1987). Education as a public and private good. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 628–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G. N., & Seng, M. S. Y. (2003). The third wave: future trends in international education. Int J Educ Manag, 17(3), 90–99. doi:10.1108/09513540310467778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McBurnie, G., & Ziguras, C. (2007). Transnational education: issues and trends in offshore higher education. New York;London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of education policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reilly, B. (2008). Digital encounters: using information technology in an overseas branch campus. Hist Teach, 41(4), 531–541.Google Scholar
  19. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, P., & Peters, M. A. (2008). Neoliberalism, higher education and research. Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Shields, R. (2013). Globalization and international education. Contemporary issues in education studies series. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. Streitwieser, B., Miller-Idriss, C., & deWit, H. (2017). Higher Education’s response to the European refugee crisis. In J. Gacel-Avila, E. Jones, N. Jooste, & H. de Wit (Eds.), The globalization of internationalization: emerging voices and perspectives in the series, internationalization in higher education. London: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-1138100640.Google Scholar
  24. Verger, A. (2009). GATS and higher education: state of play of the liberalization commitments. Higher Education Policy, 22, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, Q., Cheng, Y., & Liu, N. C. (2013). Building World-Class Universities. In Building World-Class Universities (pp. 1–10). Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2006). Examining differences in state support for higher education: a comparative study of state appropriations for research I universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 935–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wildavsky, B. (2012). The great brain race: How global universities are reshaping the world. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education. High Educ, 64(5), 627–645. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9516-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkins, S. (2011). Who benefits from foreign universities in the Arab Gulf States? Aust Univ Rev, 53(1), 73–83.Google Scholar
  30. Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P. G., & Rumbley, L. (2016). The global academic rankings game: changing institutional policy, practice, and academic life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Zumeta, W., Breneman, D. W., Callan, P. M., & Finney, J. E. (2012). Financing American higher education in the era of globalization. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Education and Human DevelopmentThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.AlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations