Skip to main content
Log in

Clusters as Innovative Melting Pots?—the Meaning of Cluster Management for Knowledge Diffusion in Clusters

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is broad consensus that economic development and society welfare correlate with the effectiveness and efficiency of countries’ science, technology, and innovation infrastructure. There is a broad range of actors active in all fields with diverging ambitions, missions, and aims striving for scientific, technological, and innovation excellence. Still one actor alone faces severe challenges in the respective global competition which is why increasingly clusters are formed and quipped with professional management. This raises the question if knowledge diffusion channels function more effective and efficient in organically grown self-organized channels or if targeted public policy intervention is needed to enhance these channels by means of attached cluster management. The article discusses the major conceptual features of cluster management and spillovers and the resulting implications for cluster management activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahedo, M. (2004). Cluster policy in the Basque Country (1991-2002): Constructing industry government’ collaboration through cluster-associations. European Planning Studies, 12(8), 1097–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. (1999). Interactive learning and localised knowledge in globalizing learning economies. GeoJournal, 49, 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, K., & Norhashim, M. (2008). Cluster-based policy making: Assessing performance and sustaining competitiveness. Review of Policy Research, 25(4), 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2002). Wirtschaftsgeographie: Ökonomische Beziehungen in räumlicher Perspektive (Economic geography: economic relations in spatial perspective). Stuttgart: UTB-Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Taylor, M. (2002). Clusters, power and place: inequality and local growth in timespace. Geografiska Annaler, 84B, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellantuono, N., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2013). Different practices for open innovation: a context-based approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowska, D., Lundmark, M., & Malmberg, A. (2011). Brain circulation and flexible adjustment: labour mobility as a cluster advantage. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Fornahl, D. (2011). Cluster evolution and a roadmap for future research. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1295–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsaris, C., & Vamvaka, V. (2016). Attitude toward entrepreneurship: structure, prediction from behavioral beliefs, and relation to entrepreneurial intention. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 433. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0227-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2003). Mobility and social networks: localised knowledge network spillovers revisited. Milan: CESPRI (Centro di Ricercasui Processi di Innovazione e Internazionalizzazione).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2000). Cluster dynamics in theory and practice with application to Scotland, regional and industrial policy research paper no 38. Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. London and New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Borowik, I. (2010). Forms and role of cluster initiatives in fostering innovation in post-industrial regions: a comparative study of environmental technologies clusters in the British West Midlands and the Spanish Basque Country. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 3(3–4), 222–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Meissner, D. (2016). Glocal targeted open innovation: challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9497-0.

  • Carayannis, E. G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2015). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9433-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., Grebeniuk, A., & Meissner, D. (2016). Smart roadmapping for STI policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes M. (2016). Higher education institutions in the knowledge triangle. Foresight and STI Governance 10(4)

  • Cervantes, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). (2014). Commercialising public research under the open innovation model: new trends. Foresight and STI Governance., 8(3), 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. L. (2010). Foresight mechanism for policy coordination: some explanations based on transaction-cost view within knowledge networks. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 6(1–3), 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D., & Huggins, R. (2003). High-technology clustering in Cambridge (UK). In F. Sforzi (Ed.), The institutions of local development (pp. 51–74). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covi, G. (2016). Local systems’ strategies copying with globalization: collective local entrepreneurship. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 513. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0225-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmann, E., Dominguez, L., Günther, J., & Jindra, B. (2015). The importance of localized related variety for international diversification of corporate technology. Regional Studies, 50(10), 1648–1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI. (2004). Practical guide to cluster development, report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the English RDAs by Ecotec Research & Consulting. London: DTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echajari, L., & Thomas, C. (2015). Learning from complex and heterogeneous experiences: the role of knowledge codification. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 968–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fallick, B., Fleischman, C. A., & Rebitzer, J. B. (2006). Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. (2003). The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation, 10(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation–the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9(85), 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (1993). Implementing advanced manufacturing technologies in mature industrial regions: towards a social model of technology production. Regional Studies, 27, 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (2003). Local knowledge: tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler, J., & Armbrüster, T. (2003). Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: the mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. Organization Studies, 24, 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., & Shmatko, N. (2016). Myths and realities of highly qualified labor and what it means for PhDs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0403-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I. R., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks. Urban Studies, 37, 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, A. (2001). Information poverty or overload? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 33(3), 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groen, A., Van Der Sijde, P., & Walsh, S. (2008). Introduction: entrepreneurship’s role in commercializing disruptive technologies. International Small Business Journal, 26(1), 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A. (2015). Crowding at the frontier: boundary spanners, gatekeepers and knowledge brokers. Journal of Knowledge Management 2015, 19(5), 1029–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassen, T. B., Klein, J., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2011). Building local nodes in a global sector: Clustering within the aeronautics industry in Montreal. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 55(4), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36, 1017–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., & Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å. (2009). Bridging the functional and territorial rationales—proposing an integrating framework for regional dynamics. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1117–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., Ramírez-Pasillas, R., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., Caffarena, L., Cruz, A., Epure, M., Pérez, E., Kapelko, M., Murdock, K., Nanka-Bruce, D., Olejárová, M., Lopez, A., Sekki, A., Stoian, M.-C., Tötterman, H., & Bisignano, A. (2007). Understanding the industrial district: contrasting conceptual images as a road to insight. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(6), 527–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Evans, D., Klofsten, M., Andersson, E., & Pandya, D. (1999). Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the industrial liaison office. R & D Management, 29(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2000). Introduction. In M. Kenney (Ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region (pp. 1–14). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketels, C., & Memedovic, O. (2008). From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(3), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindras, A., Meissner, D., & Vishnevskiy, K. (2015). Regional foresight for bridging national science, technology, and innovation with company innovation: experiences from Russia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0296-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (1996). Stimulation of technology-based small firms—a case study of university-industry cooperation. Technovation, 16(4), 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., Bienkowska, D., Laur, I., & Sölvell, I. (2015). Success factors in cluster initiative management. Industry & Higher Education, 29(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsenko, E. (2015). Pilot innovative territorial clusters in Russia: a sustainable development model. Foresight and STI Governance., 9, 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutsenko E. S., Meissner D. (2013). Key features of the first phase of the National Cluster Programme in Russia / NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP BRP. Science, Technology and Innovation. 2013. No. 11/STI/2013.

  • Laur, I., Klofsten, M., & Bienkowska, D. (2012). Catching regional development dreams: a study of cluster initiatives as intermediaries. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1909–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liyanage, S. (1995). Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks. Technovation, 15(9), 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundequist, P., & Power, D. (2002). Putting porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: evidence from Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., & Borras, S. (1997). The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy (p. 2009). Brussels: European Commission Mattsson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, R. (2007). Beat the system: 11 secrets to building an entrepreneurial culture in a bureaucratic world. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov, V., Ayvazyan, S., Afanasyev, M., Bakhtizin, A., & Nanavyan, A. (2016). Modeling the development of regional economy and an innovation space efficiency. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(3), 76–90. doi:10.17323/1995-459X.2016.3.76.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1997). Towards an explanation of industry agglomeration and regional specialization. European Planning Studies, 5, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34, 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (1998). Low-tech competitive advantages and the role of proximity: the Danish wooden Furniture industry. European Urban and Regional Studies, 5(2), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (2001a). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (2001b). Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, H. (2009). Innovating in cluster/cluster as innovation: the case of the biotech valley cluster initiative. European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D. (2012). The economic impact of spillovers from R&D and Innovation. ФOPCAЙT, 12(4), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D. (2014). Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D. (2015). Public-private partnership models for science, technology, and innovation cooperation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0310-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. S. (2016). Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K., Reynolds, E., & Reamer, A. (2008). Clusters and competitiveness: a new federal role for stimulating regional economies. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møen, J. (2001). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research (NEBR) Report 7834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environment and Planning, 41(6), 1480–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., & Zhegu, M. (2005). Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers? Industry & Innovation, 12(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paraponaris, C., & Sigal, M. (2015). From knowledge to knowing, from boundaries to boundary construction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 881–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proskuryakova, L. N., Meissner, D., & Rudnik, P. B. (2016). The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F., Becattini, G., & Sengenberger, W. (1990). Industrial districts and interfirm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti, R., Bramanti, A., & Gordon, R. (1997). The dynamics of innovative regions: the GREMI approach. Aldershot and Brookfield: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L.; Almeida, P. (2001). Who’s building on whom? Overcoming localization biases through alliances and mobility. In: Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2001, No. 1, pp. E1-E6). Academy of Management.

  • Salonius, H., & Käpylä, J. (2013). Exploring the requirements of regional knowledge-based management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 583–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibany, A., & Reiner, C. (2014). Can basic research provide a way out of economic stagnation? Foresight-Russia, 8(4), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., & Günther, J. (2012). What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), S358–S369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skokan, K. (2005). Financing cluster initiatives. Econ ´05 (selected research papers), Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics 12:317–324. ISSN 0862–7908.

  • Sölvell, O. (2009). Clusters: balancing evolutionary and constructive forces. Stockholm: Ivory Tower AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sum, N., & Jessop, B. (2013). Competitiveness, the knowledge-based economy and higher education. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 24. doi:10.1007/s13132-012-0121-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teigland, R., & Lindqvist, G. (2007). Seeing eye-to-eye: how do public and private sector views of a biotech cluster and its cluster initiative differ? European Planning Studies, 15(6), 767–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., & Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: comparing software firms in Moravia–Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zaytseva, A., Shuvalova, O., & Meissner, D. User innovation - empirical evidence from Russia (2013). Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 08/STI/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246685 or 10.2139/ssrn.2246685.

  • Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V., Pankratov, A., & Kutsenko, E. S. (2016). Potential high-tech сlusters in Russian regions: from current policy to new growth areas. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(3), 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of the subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Meissner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Günther, J., Meissner, D. Clusters as Innovative Melting Pots?—the Meaning of Cluster Management for Knowledge Diffusion in Clusters. J Knowl Econ 8, 499–512 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0467-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0467-z

Keywords

Navigation