Micro-Cultural Preferences and Macro-Percolation of New Ideas: A NetLogo Simulation
This paper provides an extension of the Schelling agent-based model (ABM) of segregation which is augmented here with a mechanism for the percolation of new ideas. The main objective of the paper is to demonstrate that individual segregation preferences affect not only the intensity of aggregate segregation, but also the aggregate efficiency from crucial decision-making processes, such as the decision to invest in new ideas. To perform our research, we implement a NetLogo simulation in two steps by (i) obtaining three sets, each composed of 500 random segregation patterns, generated through a one-step simulation of a Schelling ABM for three different levels of segregation preference: namely, 20, 25 and 30%; and (ii) using the obtained level of segregation, we set the porosity level in a model for the percolation of new ideas and record the observed speed of percolation of new ideas for the first 100 steps. We find that levels of segregation due to 20 and 25% individual preference for homophily produce a difference of 3.4% in their effect on the speed of the percolation of new ideas. The levels of segregation of 25 and 30% individual preference for homophily, however, produce a difference of 12.8% in their effect on the percolation of new ideas. This means that the increase of the individual preference for segregation increases the intensity with which segregation acts as a barrier for new ideas to percolate successfully in the world of R&D investment. The segregation-percolation model used can be extended with further dynamics and developed as a code to be added to the NetLogo library. The main implication of our findings is that small changes in segregation preferences as in the Schelling ABM model produces increasingly negative on aggregate level spillover effects on other socio-economic processes, such as percolation of new ideas, which depend on the connectivity between people in the local society.
KeywordsSegregation Percolation Cultural preferences Ideas R&D investment
JEL ClassificationsZ10 C79 C99 L26 R11
- Arribas-Bel, D., Nijkamp, P., Poot, J. 2014. How diverse can spatial measures of cultural diversity be? Results from Monte Carlo simulations of an agent-based model. Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, Discussion Paper Series, CPD 22/14.Google Scholar
- Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Dawson, J. (2010). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64, 307–336.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1989). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. The Academy of Management Review., 9(3), 389–398.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Iozzi, F. 2008. A simple implementation of Schelling’s segregation model in NetLogo. University of Bocconi, Dondena Working Paper 015.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M., Lopez-Pintado, D. 2012. Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily. CORE Discussion Papers 2012012, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).Google Scholar
- Jacquemet, N., Yannelis, C., 2012. Indiscriminate discrimination: a correspondence test for ethnic homophily in the Chicago Labor Market. PSE—Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" hal-00745109, HA.Google Scholar
- Janssen, M. (1990). Micro and macro in economics: an inquiry into their relation (Groningen theses in economics, management and organization). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhof.Google Scholar
- Jensen, P., Palangkaraya, A., Webster, E. 2014. Trust and the market for technology. Corrected Proof, Available online 5 November 2014.Google Scholar
- Joyce, D., Kennison, J., Densmore, O., Guerin, S., Barr, S., Charles, E., & Thompson, N. (2006). My way or the highway: a more naturalistic model of altruism tested in an iterative prisoners’ dilemma, journal of artificial societies and social. Simulation., 9(2).Google Scholar
- Montes, G. (2012). Using artificial societies to understand the impact of teacher student match on academic performance: the case of same race effects, journal of artificial societies and social. Simulation., 15(4), 8.Google Scholar
- Shackle, G. L. S. (1949). Expectation in economics. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review., 59(2), 488–493.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Tubadji, A., Nijkamp, P. 2015a. The cultural percolation of new knowledge: a regional analysis for cultural impact on knowledge creation in the EU27. In J. Bakens, J. Poot and P. Nijkamp (eds.) The Economics of Cultural Diversity, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. Forthcoming, pp. 297–326.Google Scholar
- Wilensky, U. 1997. NetLogo Segregation model. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Segregation. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
- Wilensky, U. 1998. NetLogo Percolation model. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Percolation. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
- Wilensky, U. 1999. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.