Skip to main content
Log in

Why Help Others? A Study of Consumers’ Participation in Online Communities for Customer Support

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an extended approach to online communities for customer support by addressing how consumers participate, why they participate, and what companies can do to encourage participation. Based on a literature review, four forms of participation are identified: help seeking, help giving, participating in reflective reframing, and conducting reinforcing activities. An exploratory study enables the identification of items measuring the four forms of participation. The items are statistically validated by running confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) in Lisrel 9.10. By performing structural equation modeling (SEM) in Lisrel 9.10 based on survey data, it is revealed that four antecedents influence participation: hedonic benefits, learning benefits, social integrative benefits, and personal integrative benefits. Furthermore, it is found that these antecedents influence the four forms of participation differently. Finally, the study shows how companies can facilitate social integrative benefits and personal integrative benefits and thereby indirectly stimulate participation in the community. In order not to miss out on important insights, researchers should include all four forms of participation as these are influenced by different antecedents. Scales and items for measuring participation are provided. Companies are advised to determine what form(s) of participation they want from the consumers, and try to motivate them accordingly. Recommendations on how that can be done are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci, 40(8), 8–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural models. J Acad Mark Sci, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Open source software user communities: a study of participation in Linux user groups. Manag Sci, 52(7), 1099–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. J Consum Res, 40, 477–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). The signaling role of IT features in influencing trust and participation in online communities. Int J Electron Commer, 15(4), 7–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol Bull, 107, 256–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalao, L. V., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2013). New members integration: key factor of success in online travel communities. J Bus Res, 66, 706–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalao, L. V., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of consumer participation in online communities: the case of the travel sector. Int J Electron Commer, 15(2), 137–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalao, L. V., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2010). Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions. Tour Manag, 31, 898–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalao, L. V., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2008). Promoting consumers’ participation in virtual brand communities: a new paradigm in branding strategy. J Mark Commun, 14(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, A., Hsieh, S. H., & Lin, F. (2013). Personality traits that lead members of online brand communities to participate in information sending and receiving. Int J Electron Commer, 17(3), 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as moderator. Information & Management, 48, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Marsden, J. R., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation. J Manag Inf Syst, 29(2), 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based communities. Int J Res Mark, 21, 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erden, Z., Von Krogh, G., & Kim, S. (2012). Knowledge sharing in an online community of volunteers: the role of community munificence. Eur Manag Rev, 9, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res, 18, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J. (2006). Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated by producers. Adv Consum Res, 33, 639–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Matzler, K., & Hoppe, M. (2008). Brand community members as a source of innovation. J Prod Innov Manag, 25, 608–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Mühlbacker, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2010). Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. J Manag Inf Syst, 26(3), 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnfeld, I., Iseke, A., & Krebs, A. (2012). Explicit incentives in online communities: boon or bane? Int J Electron Commer, 17(1), 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. J Mark, 71, 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, R. L., Homburg, C., & Lukas, B. A. (2014). Firm-hosted online brand communities and new product success. J Acad Mark Sci, 42, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Barry, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Sixth ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, X., Kwortnik Jr., R. J., & Want, C. (2008). Service loyalty: an integrative model and examination across service contexts. J Serv Res, 11(1), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of Creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organ Sci, 17(4), 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta, E., Salter, S. B., Lewis, P. A., & Yeow, P. (2012). Motivating employees to share their failures in knowledge management systems: anonymity and culture. J Inf Syst, 26(2), 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, L. B., & Fredriksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ Sci, 17(1), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., Yong Park, J., & Kim, H. S. (2010b). What makes online community members commit? A social exchange perspective. Behav Inform Technol, 29(6), 587–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X. L., Lee, M. K. O., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2010a). Predicting continuance in online communities: model development and empirical test. Behav Inform Technol, 29(4), 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, N. Y., Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2014). Influence of consumer attitude toward online brand community on revisit intention and brand trust. J Retail Consum Serv, 21, 581–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature review in software engineering, technical report. Keele: Keele University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, B. J., Young-Gul, K., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Commun ACM, 50(2), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. (1999). E-Tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. Eur Manag J, 17(3), 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R., Hemetsberger, A., & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds: collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2011). The impact of online brand community type on consumer community engagement behaviors: consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web-sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inf Syst Res, 18(1), 42–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madupo, V., & Cooley, D. O. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of online brand community participation: a conceptual framework. J Internet Commer, 9, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull, 14, 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building Brand Community. J Mark, 66, 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosavi, S. A., & Kenarehfard, M. (2013). The impact of value creation practices on brand trust and loyalty in a Samsung galaxy online brand community in Iran. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 8(2), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhdi, L., & Boutellier, R. (2011). Motivational factors affecting participation and contribution of members in two different Swiss innovation communities. Int J Innov Manag, 15(3), 543–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniz Jr., A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. J Consum Res, 27, 412–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Different roles, different strokes: organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organ Sci, 21(2), 554–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: testing a model of voluntary participation in value Co-creation activities. J Prod Innov Manag, 26, 388–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Interactions in virtual customer environments: implications for product support and customer relationship management. J Interact Mark, 21(2), 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O., Ye, C., & Kumar, N. (2012). A social capital perspective on meta-knowledge contribution and social computing. Decis Support Syst, 53, 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O., Mor, N., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: a multidimensional perspective. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 61(3), 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O. (2007). What motivates Wikipedians? Commun ACM, 50(11), 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki, S. (2009). Social influence model and electronic work of mouth, PC versus mobile internet. Int J Advert, 28(3), 439–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pai, P. Y., & Tsai, H. T. (2011). How virtual community participation influences consumer loyalty intentions in shopping contexts: an investigation of mediating factors. Behaviour and Information Technology, 30(5), 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). The role of social network websites in the consumer-brand relationship. J Retail Consum Serv, 21, 460–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petukiene, E., Tijunaitine, R., & Damkuviene, M. (2012). Participation of clients in public services: the aspect of motivating. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 23(3), 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Abherwal, R. (2009). Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. J Assoc Inf Syst, 10(10), 721–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag, 12(4), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition – co-creation unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. L., & Arnould, E. (1999). Commercial friendships: service provider-client relationships in context. J Mark, 63, 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. J Comput-Mediat Commun, 12, 1428–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., Hughes, M., & Kertbo, K. (2014). Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities. Eur J Mark, 48, 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (2012). Co-production: option or obligation? Australian Journal of public administration, 71(3), 314–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaedel, U., & Clemet, M. (2010). Managing the online crowd: motivations for engagement in user-generated content. Journal of Media Business Studies, 7(3), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: an ethnography of the new bikers. J Consum Res, 22, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, C., & Wagner, S. (2008). Outlaw community innovations. Int J Innov Manag, 12(3), 399–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, K. N., Yu, A. Y., & Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behavior & Information Technology, 29(4), 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Fang, Y., & Lim, K. H. (2012). Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decis Support Syst, 53, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., Kim, Y., Kwon, O., & Moon, J. (2010). An explorative study of Korean consumer participation in virtual brand communities in social network sites. J Glob Mark, 23, 430–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H. T., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Q, 36(1), 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H. T., & Pai, P. (2014). Why do newcomers participate in virtual communities? An integration of self-determination and relationship management theories. Decis Support Syst, 7, 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H. T., Huang, H. C., & Chiu, Y. L. (2012). Brand community participation in Taiwan: examining the roles of individual-, group-, and relationship-level antecedents. J Bus Res, 66, 676–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C. H., Hsin-Chih, K., & Chen, J. M. (2014). Do types of virtual community matter for the effects of online advertisement and electronic word of mouth? Marketing Review (Xing Xiao Ping Lun), 11(1), 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernette, E., & Hamdi-Kidar, L. (2013). Co-creation with consumers: who has the competence and wants to cooperate? Int J Mark Res, 55(4), 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Yang, Z. (2013). Customer participation and project performance: the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the Chinese telecommunication service industry. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 20, 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tour Manag, 25, 709–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woisetschläger, D. M., Hartleb, V., & Blut, M. (2008). How to make brand communities work: antecedents and consequences of consumer participation. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 7(3), 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., Li, D., & Shao, G. (2012). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: a study of citizenship behavior and its social-relational antecedents. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, H. J. R., Hsu, H. Y. S., & Huang, C. Y. (2011). Good soldiers on the web: understanding the drivers of participation in online communities of consumption. Int J Electron Commer, 15(4), 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., & Rolland, E. (2012). Knowledge-sharing in virtual communities: familiarity, anonymity and self-determination theory. Behav Inform Technol, 31(11), 1133–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, K., Stylianou, A. C., & Zheng, Y. (2013). Predicting users’ continuance intention in virtual communities: the dual intention-formation process. Decis Support Syst, 55, 903–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, Y. K., & Zhang, L. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: a social capital perspective. Int J Inf Manag, 32, 574–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Li, D., & Hou, W. (2011). Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. Int J Electron Commer, 15(4), 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. M., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: an empirical investigation. Decis Support Syst, 96, 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Wu, J. P., Zhang, Q., & Xu, S. (2013). Transforming visitors into members in online brand communities: evidence from China. J Bus Res, 66, 2438–2443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Njål Sivertstøl.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Table 1 Antecedents of participation in online communities
Table 2 Participation in online communities
Table 3 Variables influencing antecedents of participation
Table 4 CFA and validity checks new scales, based on pretest data
Table 5 CFA and validity checks full measurement model, based on main survey
Table 6 Results of sem of research model
Table 8 Mediation tests

* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001

Table 7 CFA full measurement model phi matrix based on main survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivertstøl, N. Why Help Others? A Study of Consumers’ Participation in Online Communities for Customer Support. J Knowl Econ 9, 1442–1476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0438-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0438-9

Keywords

Navigation