Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Technological Shock on Employment: Application of Structural Approach VECM

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the link between technological changes and employment. The objective of this work is to determine the impact of technological innovations in the short and long term. In all the developed countries, the unemployed are rather low-skilled whereas highly skilled employees face less unemployment problems. Several studies have shown that technical progress leads to the casualization of non-skilled labor and to unemployment. This idea is based on the substitution of capital at work. Moreover, technical progress requires a skilled workforce capable of creating, innovating, and controlling further progress. Thus, technological innovations are not neutral; there are skill-biased technological changes. However, according to the theory of compensation, technological innovations reduce short-term employment (replacement effect) but create it in the medium and long term (compensation effect). The empirical validation of this work is based on the technique of structural VECM for the case of Tunisia. Unlike the theory of compensation, our results support the fact that the short-term effect of technological innovations on employment is positive; however, in the medium and long term, it is negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Figures are from the JMulti software.

References

  • Antonucci, T., & Pianta, M. (2002). Employment effects of product and process innovation in Europe. International Review of Applied Economics, 16, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attour, A., & Barbaroux, P. (2015). Le rôle des processus de connaissances dans le cycle de vie d’un écosystème d’affaires. Association Internationale de Management Stratégique (AIMS), Strasbourg, 17 and 18 September.

  • Berman, E., & Machin, S. (2000). Skill-biased technology transfer, evidence of factor biased technological change in developing countries. Working paper.

  • Boyer, R. (1988a). New technologies and employment in the 1980s: from science and technology to macroeconomic modelling. In J. A. Kregel, E. Matzner, & A. Roncaglia (Eds.), Barriers to full employment (pp. 233–268). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1988b). Assessing the impact of RD on employment: Puzzle or consensus?. Paper presented at the International Conference on New Technology: Its Impacts on Labour Markets and the Employment System, Berlin, December 5-7.

  • Boyer, R. (1990). The capital labor relations in OECD countries: From the Fordist « Golden Age » to Contrasted National Trajectories. Working paper CEPREMAP, (9020), Paris.

  • Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1993). Employment growth and innovation at the firm level: an empirical study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3, 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y. & Puttitanun T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 474-493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. (2012). Innovation in creative industries from the quadruple helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Globalization and employment: Imported skill biased technological change in developing countries. Working paper.

  • Dobbs, I. M., Hill, M. B., & Waterson, M. (1987). Industrial structure and the employment consequences of technical change. Oxford Economic Papers, 39, 552–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & McKelvey, M. (2001). Innovation and employment: product versus process innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Entorf, H., & Pohlmeier, W. (1990). Employment, innovation and export activities. In J. P. Florens (Ed.), Microeconometrics: surveys and applications. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2013). The Penn World Tables (Mark 8.0). Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, CIC.

  • Fève, P., & Guay, A. (2010). Identification of technology shocks in structural VARs. Economics Journal, 120(549), 1284–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1994). Work for all or mass unemployment? Computerized technical change into the twenty-first century. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman J. L., Porter M. E. & Stern S. (2002). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899-933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1969). Capital-skill complementarity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 5, 465–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1995). R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurements issues. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2005). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro data from four European counties, research project: Innovation and employment in European firms. Micro econometric Evidence (IEEF).

  • Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). The Penn World Tables (Mark 7.1). Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, CIC.

  • Hicks, J. R. (1932). The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1973). Capital and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaumendreu, J. (2003). Does innovation spur employment? A firm-level analysis using Spanish. CIS Data. mimeo.

  • Johansen S. (1995). Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karaomerlioglu, D. C., & Ansal, H. K. (2000). Innovation and employment in developing countries. In M. Vivarelli & M. Pianta (Eds.), The employment impact of innovation: evidence and policy (pp. 164–181). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (1994). The unemployment crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Merono-Cerdan, A. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancusi, M. (2004). International Spillovers and Absorvitive Capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on European patents and citations. Instituto de Economia Politica, Università Bocconi.

  • Marschall, A. (1961). Principles of economics (1st ed.). Cambridge: Macmillan. 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1961). Capital (1st ed.). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnif, S. (2013). Changements Technologique, Croissance et inégalités, doctoral thesis, Faculté des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion de Sfax, Université Rennes 2-Haute Bretagne.

  • Mnif, S. (2015). L’impact des changements technologiques sur les inégalités des revenus dans les pays en développement. La Revue Gestion et Organisation, 7(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawab, S., Nazir, T., Zahid, M. M., & Fawad, S. M. (2015). Knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering, 1(1), 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investment in humans, technological diffusion and economic growth. American Economic Review, 56, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S., & Kong, P. (1989). Technical progress and jobs. Centre for Labour Economics. London School of Economics, Discussion Paper, (366), London.

  • Pasinetti, L. (1981). Structural change and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. (2004). Employment effects of different innovation activities: Micro-econometric evidence. ZEW Discussion Paper 04-73, ZEW.

  • Pianta, M. (2004). Innovation and employment. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. chap. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. (1933). The theory of unemployment. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. (1962). The economics of welfare (1st ed.). London: Macmillan. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randeree, E. (2006). Knowledge management: securing the future. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saikkinen P. & Lutkepohl H. (2000). Testing for the Cointegrating Rank of a VAR Process with Structural Shifts. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 18, 451-464.

  • Ricardo, D. (1951). Principles of political economy. In P. Sraffa (Ed.), The works and correspondence of David Ricardo (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saafi, S., & Sboui, F. (2012) conséquences de la diffusion des innovations technologiques sur l’emploi industriel en Tunisie: une analyse sur des données de panel. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 137.

  • Say, J. B. (1964). A treatise on political economy or the production, distribution and consumption of wealth (1st ed.). New York: M. Kelley. 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolny, W. (1998). Innovations, prices and employment: a theoretical model and an empirical application for West German manufacturing firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuart, J. (1966). An inquiry into the principles of political economy (1st ed.). Chicago: Oliver and Boyd. 1767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. (1983). The economic analysis of technological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timur, A. T., & Ponak, A. (2002). Labor relations and technological change at Canadian Pacific Railway. Journal of Labor Research, XXIII(4), 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen, J. (1997). Employment and technological innovation: evidence from U.K. manufacturing firms. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M. (1995). The economics of technology and employment: theory and empirical evidence. Aldershot: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M., & Pianta, M. (2000). The employment impact of innovation: evidence and policy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold, D., & Nair-Reichert, U. (2008). Innovation, inequalities and intellectual property rights. World Development, 37(5), 889–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1961). Lectures on political economy (1st ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan. 1901-1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2014). On the web.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, road of Airport km 4.5, LP 1088, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia

    Sirine Mnif, Chiraz Feki & Ines Abdelkafi

Authors
  1. Sirine Mnif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiraz Feki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ines Abdelkafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirine Mnif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 2 Dickey fuller test
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 3 Co-integration test of Johansen
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mnif, S., Feki, C. & Abdelkafi, I. Effects of Technological Shock on Employment: Application of Structural Approach VECM. J Knowl Econ 9, 1138–1153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0405-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0405-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation