Advertisement

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Rediscovering Comte de Saint-Simon: From Aristocracy to Meritocracy, a Journey to Inclusion

  • Naira R. Matevosyan
Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

A born aristocrat, Saint-Simon converted to meritocracy, advocating a technocratic concept where economy was managed by technical masters whose leadership was based on merits and who were neither entitled nor elected but fitted to navigate the organizational change. We introduce a health-care efficiency assessment model construed on the elements of Saint-Simon’s utopistic theory. Social morality and technological optimism are analyzed to conscript arts of doctrinal ends with arts of productivity. A debate between the technocratic and market-based health care rests on a transcendent, yet anthropocentric criteria: value, valence, and expectancy. Based on a comparative effectiveness analysis of health-care value and expectancy, the German, Spanish, and Japanese health-care systems appear to be closer to the technocratic model due to the principal of social solidarity and uniform evaluation standard that define the schedule of charges for services and their relative point value to one another. Germany, Spain, and Japan spend less on per capita health needs than the USA; however, in those countries life expectancy is higher than that in the USA. The American health-care system utilizes more MRI exams and the physician’s EMR response is lower. In a cross section, maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortality rates are higher in the USA compared to those in Germany (relative risk (RR) = 4.0; 2.0; 2.6 correspondingly), Spain (RR = 7.0; 1.5; 8.0), and Japan (RR = 4.7; 4.0; 24.0).

Keywords

Comparative effectiveness analysis Expectancy Krankenkasse Merit distribution Nudging Resource-based relative value scale Saint-Simon Social solidarity Technological optimism Valence Value 

References

  1. Amadeo, K. (2014). World’s largest economy. About; retrieved June 14.Google Scholar
  2. Barré de Saint-Venant AJC (1853). De l’interprétation géométrique des clefs algébriques et des déterminants. C R Acad Science de Paris 36, 582–585.Google Scholar
  3. Barros, P. P. (2012). Health policy reform in tough times: the case of Portugal. Health Policy, 106(1), 17–22Google Scholar
  4. Blendon, R. J., Donelan, K., & Leitman, R. (1993). Physicians’ perspectives on caring for patients in the United States, Canada, and West Germany. The New England Journal of Medicine, 328(14), 1011–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blendon, R. J., Leitman, R., Morrison, I., et al. (1990). Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Affairs, 9(2), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenthal, D., Stremikis, K. (2013). Getting real about health care value. Harvard Business review.Google Scholar
  7. Cleveland, C. J. (2006). Biophysical economics. Encyclopedia of earth.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, K. A. (2013). The most efficient healthcare system in the world (INFOGRAPHICS). The Huffington Post.Google Scholar
  9. Duffy E (1948). Leeper's motivational theory of emotion. Psychological Review 55(6), 324–8.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (2009). Socialism and saint-simon. Revivals, Routledge (Hardcover).Google Scholar
  11. Frank, M. E. (1962). The prophets of Paris. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Goyau, G. (2014). Saint-Simon and Saint-Simonism. In the Catholic encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton CompanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Grassmann, H. (1840). Theorie der Ebbe und Flut. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
  14. Green, D. G., Irvine, B., Cackett, B. (2005). Health care in Germany. CIVITAS, The Institute of Study of Civil Society.Google Scholar
  15. Griffith, J. R. (2000). Championship management for healthcare organizations. J. Healthc. Manag., 45, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, W. R. (1846). London, Edinburgh & Dublin Philosophical Magazine. 3rd series 29 27.Google Scholar
  17. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Henke, D. K., Murray, M. A., & Ade, C. (1994). Global budgeting in Germany: lessons for the United States. Health Aff., 13(4), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ionescu, G. (1976). The political thought of Saint-Simon. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Krier, J. E., Gillette, C. P. (1985). The uneasy case for technological optimism. Michigan law review. Michigan University Association.Google Scholar
  21. Leeper, R. W. (1948). A motivational theory of emotion to replace emotion as disorganized response. Psychology Review, 55(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malmo, R. B. (1959). A neuropsychological dimension. Psychological Review, 66(6), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manuel, F. E. (1956). The new world of Henri Saint-Simon. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McWilliam, N. (1993). Dreams of happiness: social art and the French left, 1830-1850. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Medina, Y. (2009). Do German insurance plans have lessons for America? Ezine Articles.Google Scholar
  26. National Vital Statistics Reports (2012). Fetal and perinatal mortality. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_08.pdf
  27. Nimeri, N., Rahman, S., Tinay, S., et al. (2013). The national perinatal mortality rate in the state of Qatar during 2011; trends since 1990 and comparative analysis with selected high-income countries: the PEARL Study Project. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 41(3), 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD (2014) Economic survey of Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Ortman, J. M., Velkoff, V. A., Hogan, H. (2014). An aging nation: the older population in the United States. Population estimates and projections, The U.S. Census Bureau ReportGoogle Scholar
  30. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (45 CFR 156.135). https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/.../av-calculator-methodology.pdf
  31. Pattinson, R. C. (2009). Saving babies 2006-2007: Sixth perinatal care survey of South Africa. Pretoria: Tshepesa Press.Google Scholar
  32. Porter, M. E. (2010). What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2477–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reinhardt, U. E. (1994). Global budgeting in German health care: insight for Americans. Domestic Affairs; 159-194.Google Scholar
  34. Schlossberg, N. K. (2005). Counseling adults in transition: linking practice with theory. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, H., & Faulkner, J. K. (1894). History and purpose of technocracy. Technocracy Incorporated: Continental Headquarters.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, P. C. (2012). What is the scope for health system efficiency gains and how can they be achieved? Eurohealth Incorporating Euro Observer, 18(3), 3–6.Google Scholar
  37. SNS. (2010). Recursos y actividades del SNS. Hospitales. msps.es Ministerio de Sanidad.Google Scholar
  38. Sunstein, C. (2015). Nudges do not undermine human agency. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(8) Google Scholar
  39. Sunstein, C. (2015). Nudges and choice architecture: ethical considerations. Yale Journal on Regulation.Google Scholar
  40. Thomson, S., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Jun, M. (2013). International profiles of health care systems. The Commonwealth Fund Pub. No 1717.Google Scholar
  41. Veblen, T. (1891). Some neglected points in the theory of socialism. Annals of AAPSS.Google Scholar
  42. Vroom, V. (1998). The expectancy theory of motivation. Yale School of Management.Google Scholar
  43. Willson, E. A., Polk, L. R. (1990). Professional and practice development. Medical Economics Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  44. World Factbook. (2014). CIA. Retrieved 30 August.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open Medical InstituteAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations