Abstract
Organizations are dealing with increasing demands for innovative and sustainable products and services at the same time as they have to maintain and improve quality and efficiency. This reality calls for a better understanding of the knowledge worker. This paper seeks to highlight some of the personality or personal characteristics of an expert or knowledge worker and to gain a deeper understanding of expert behavior in an organization or a project. The study is conducted as a survey directed to highly educated people engaged in product development on the global stage. This subjective self-assessment gives valuable results and brings about new knowledge in aligning characteristics of an expert to the traditional definition of craftsmen—emphasizing skills, commitment, and judgment. Such insight will have significant value for leaders when organizing and following up work done and driven by experts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37, 353–369.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–56.
Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90–111.
Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 222–244.
Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dreyfus, H. L., Dreyfus, S. E., & Athanasiou, T. (1986). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Drucker, P. F. (2008). Management. New York: Harper Collins.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). An introduction to Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance: its development, organization, and content. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evetts, J., Mieg, H. A., & Felt, U. (2006). Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: a sociological perspective. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fujimoto, T. (1999). Capability building and over-adaptation: a case of “fat design” in the Japanese auto industry. In Y. Lung, J. Chanaron, T. Fujimoto, & D. Raff (Eds.), Coping with variety: flexible productive systems for product variety in the auto industry. Averbury: Ashgate Publishing.
Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
Glen, P. (2003). Leading geeks: how to manage and lead people who deliver technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2009). Clever: leading your smartest, most creative people. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.
Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: the influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.
Ichijo, K. (2007). Knowledge creation and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johns, G. (2010). Some unintended consequences of job design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 361–369.
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models (4th ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitime peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liker, J. K., & Hoseus, M. (2008). Toyota culture, the heart and soul of the Toyota way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Locke, E. A., Tirnauer, D., Roberson, Q., Goldman, B., Latham, M. E., & Weldon, E. (2001). The importance of the individual in an age of groupism. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: theory and research. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Morgan, J. M., & Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota product development system, integrating people, process and technology. New York: Productivity Press.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: the future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479.
Renn, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Huning, T. M. (2011). Empirical examination of the individual-level personality-based theory of self-management failure. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 25–43.
Ryle, G. (2009). Collected essays 1929–1968 (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
Schön, D. A. (1963). Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review, 41, 77–86.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Volmer, J. (2006). Expertise in software design. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 48(8), 411–444.
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.
Weber, C., & Antal, A. B. (2001). The role of time in organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
White, A. (1982). The nature of knowledge. Totowa: Rowan and Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The workers unions for engineers provided the email addresses of their members and approved the research. The survey program secured the anonymity of the respondents, and the mail addresses were deleted afterwards. The research project, called AluPart, financed the research. The project board read the paper before approving.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holtskog, H. Defining the Characteristics of an Expert in a Social Context Through Subjective Evaluation. J Knowl Econ 8, 1014–1031 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0312-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0312-1