Facilitating Targeted Open Innovation by Applying Pragmatic Identity Matching

Abstract

How can Targeted Open Innovation (TOI) systematically be implemented in a company or organisation? Meeting Chesbrough’s paradigm of Open Innovation, Erbach’s concept of Pragmatic Identity Matching combines the pragmatism of Charles Peirce and identity research to provide a standard operation system for TOI with broad applicability. It integrates and interrelates internal and external knowledge and resources in a transparent way. Based on the semiotic model developed by Peirce and on the understanding of identity development according to social psychology, the Matrix for Identity Matching, as the central element of Pragmatic Identity Matching, facilitates intra- and inter-organisational content integration. It represents the value-neutral integration infrastructure to provide a virtual developmental space and database for information exchange, scenario development, problem solution and innovation. The focus of this article lies in matching corporate TOI development with customer needs and market requirements to ensure acceptance of the outcome. The paper describes the theory and methodology of Pragmatic Identity Matching as a collaborative knowledge platform and interaction interface. To demonstrate its versatile applicability for TOI planning, Pragmatic Identity Matching is applied to key actors of innovation development according to the concept of the Quintuple Innovation Helix of Carayannis and Campbell. The paper concludes with a vision for developing sustainable innovation within a holistic Identity Matching infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Becker, J. (2009). Marketing-Konzeption – Grundlagen des zielstrategischen und operativen Marketing-Managements (9th ed.). München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruhn, M. (2009). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Markenkommunikation (5th ed.). Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruhn, M., & Ahlers, G. M. (2013). Integrated communication in the innovation process: an approach to integrated innovation communication. In N. Pfeffermann (Ed.), Strategy and communication for innovation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carayannis, E. (2013). Quadruple and Quintuple Innovation Helix ecosystems: smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; Invited Lecture at Conference of “Open Innovation 2.0 – Sustainable Economy & Society”, Dublin, Ireland, May 20-21, 2013, Video source (lecture): YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwIqwwUM5pI (Time 5:22-6:03).

  5. Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 2010/1, 1(1), 41–69. doi:10.4018/jsesd.2010010105

  6. Carayannis, E., Barth, D. & Campbell, D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation; Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2012, electronic version http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/1/1/2

  7. Carayannis, E., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond; Journal of Knowledge and Economy 2014/5, p. 212-239. doi:10.1007/s13132-0144-0185-8

  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eccleston, D., & Griseri, L. (2008). How does Web 2.0 stretch traditional influencing patterns? International Journal of Marketing Research, 50(5), 591.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erbach, M. (2011). Identity Matching – inhaltliche integration in der strategischen Kommunikation (Dissertation); Logos, Berlin, http://www.worldcat.org/title/identity-matching-inhaltliche-integration-in-der-strategischen-kommunikation/oclc/746241989

  12. Erbach, M. (2014). The Identity Matching Concept: a collaborative planning infrastructure for integrating communication content; Conference Proceedings of the 13th International Science-to-Business Marketing Conference on Cross Organizational Value Creation in Zürich/Switzerland, p. 225-240; Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre Fachhochschule Münster, http://www.s2b-conference.com/pdf/ZHAW_S2B_Konferenz_Proceedings.pdf

  13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keupp, H., & Höfer, R. (Eds.). (1998). Identitätsarbeit heute. Frankfurt: Klassische und aktuelle Perspektiven der Identitätsforschung Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keupp, H., et al. (1999). Identitätskonstruktionen. Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory model for analysing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of Knowledge and Economy, 3, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for Open Innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lisbach, B., & Meyer, V. (2013). Linguistic Identity Matching. Wiesbaden: Springer-Vieweg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Luhmann, N. (1995). Wie ist Bewusstsein an Kommunikation beteiligt? In H. Gumbrecht & K. L. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Materialität der Kommunikation (pp. 884–905). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oehler, K. (2000). Einführung in den semiotischen Pragmatismus. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese. Perspektiven des semiotischen Pragmatismus von Charles S. Peirce (pp. 13–30). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oerter, R., & Montada, L. (1998). Entwicklungspsychologie. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peirce, C (1878) How to make our ideas clear. In C. Hartshorne & Weiss, P. (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. V. Popular Science Monthly, vol 12, (pp. 286-302) Harvard, Cambridge/Mass: University Press, 1931-1935

  24. Piller, F., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customers integration. Production Planning and Control, 15(4), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roth, G. (2001). Fühlen, Denken, Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt, S. (2000). Kommunikationen über Kommunikation über Integrierte Unternehmenskommunikation. In M. Bruhn, S. Schmidt, & J. Tropp (Eds.), Integrierte Kommunikation in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 122–141). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trabant, J. (1996). Elemente der Semiotik. Tübingen Basel: UTB Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wirth, U. (2000). Vorwort. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese. Perspektiven des semiotischen Pragmatismus von Charles S. Peirce (pp. 7–9). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wirtz, W., & Schilke, O. (2004). Ansätze des Kundenwertmanagements. In W. Wirtz & O. Göttgens (Eds.), Integriertes Marken- und Kundenwertmanagement – Strategien, Konzepte und Best Practices. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Erbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erbach, M. Facilitating Targeted Open Innovation by Applying Pragmatic Identity Matching. J Knowl Econ 7, 104–125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0293-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Open innovation
  • Planning
  • Identity matching
  • Innovation interface
  • Knowledge transfer