Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 104–125 | Cite as

Facilitating Targeted Open Innovation by Applying Pragmatic Identity Matching

  • Markus ErbachEmail author


How can Targeted Open Innovation (TOI) systematically be implemented in a company or organisation? Meeting Chesbrough’s paradigm of Open Innovation, Erbach’s concept of Pragmatic Identity Matching combines the pragmatism of Charles Peirce and identity research to provide a standard operation system for TOI with broad applicability. It integrates and interrelates internal and external knowledge and resources in a transparent way. Based on the semiotic model developed by Peirce and on the understanding of identity development according to social psychology, the Matrix for Identity Matching, as the central element of Pragmatic Identity Matching, facilitates intra- and inter-organisational content integration. It represents the value-neutral integration infrastructure to provide a virtual developmental space and database for information exchange, scenario development, problem solution and innovation. The focus of this article lies in matching corporate TOI development with customer needs and market requirements to ensure acceptance of the outcome. The paper describes the theory and methodology of Pragmatic Identity Matching as a collaborative knowledge platform and interaction interface. To demonstrate its versatile applicability for TOI planning, Pragmatic Identity Matching is applied to key actors of innovation development according to the concept of the Quintuple Innovation Helix of Carayannis and Campbell. The paper concludes with a vision for developing sustainable innovation within a holistic Identity Matching infrastructure.


Open innovation Planning Identity matching Innovation interface Knowledge transfer 


  1. Becker, J. (2009). Marketing-Konzeption – Grundlagen des zielstrategischen und operativen Marketing-Managements (9th ed.). München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  2. Bruhn, M. (2009). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Markenkommunikation (5th ed.). Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  3. Bruhn, M., & Ahlers, G. M. (2013). Integrated communication in the innovation process: an approach to integrated innovation communication. In N. Pfeffermann (Ed.), Strategy and communication for innovation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Carayannis, E. (2013). Quadruple and Quintuple Innovation Helix ecosystems: smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; Invited Lecture at Conference of “Open Innovation 2.0 – Sustainable Economy & Society”, Dublin, Ireland, May 20-21, 2013, Video source (lecture): YouTube: (Time 5:22-6:03).
  5. Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 2010/1, 1(1), 41–69. doi: 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
  6. Carayannis, E., Barth, D. & Campbell, D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation; Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2012, electronic version
  7. Carayannis, E., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond; Journal of Knowledge and Economy 2014/5, p. 212-239. doi: 10.1007/s13132-0144-0185-8
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eccleston, D., & Griseri, L. (2008). How does Web 2.0 stretch traditional influencing patterns? International Journal of Marketing Research, 50(5), 591.Google Scholar
  11. Erbach, M. (2011). Identity Matching – inhaltliche integration in der strategischen Kommunikation (Dissertation); Logos, Berlin,
  12. Erbach, M. (2014). The Identity Matching Concept: a collaborative planning infrastructure for integrating communication content; Conference Proceedings of the 13th International Science-to-Business Marketing Conference on Cross Organizational Value Creation in Zürich/Switzerland, p. 225-240; Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre Fachhochschule Münster,
  13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
  15. Keupp, H., & Höfer, R. (Eds.). (1998). Identitätsarbeit heute. Frankfurt: Klassische und aktuelle Perspektiven der Identitätsforschung Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Keupp, H., et al. (1999). Identitätskonstruktionen. Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  17. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory model for analysing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of Knowledge and Economy, 3, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for Open Innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lisbach, B., & Meyer, V. (2013). Linguistic Identity Matching. Wiesbaden: Springer-Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luhmann, N. (1995). Wie ist Bewusstsein an Kommunikation beteiligt? In H. Gumbrecht & K. L. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Materialität der Kommunikation (pp. 884–905). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Oehler, K. (2000). Einführung in den semiotischen Pragmatismus. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese. Perspektiven des semiotischen Pragmatismus von Charles S. Peirce (pp. 13–30). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Oerter, R., & Montada, L. (1998). Entwicklungspsychologie. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  23. Peirce, C (1878) How to make our ideas clear. In C. Hartshorne & Weiss, P. (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. V. Popular Science Monthly, vol 12, (pp. 286-302) Harvard, Cambridge/Mass: University Press, 1931-1935Google Scholar
  24. Piller, F., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customers integration. Production Planning and Control, 15(4), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth, G. (2001). Fühlen, Denken, Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  26. Schmidt, S. (2000). Kommunikationen über Kommunikation über Integrierte Unternehmenskommunikation. In M. Bruhn, S. Schmidt, & J. Tropp (Eds.), Integrierte Kommunikation in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 122–141). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  27. Trabant, J. (1996). Elemente der Semiotik. Tübingen Basel: UTB Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  28. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Wirth, U. (2000). Vorwort. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese. Perspektiven des semiotischen Pragmatismus von Charles S. Peirce (pp. 7–9). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  30. Wirtz, W., & Schilke, O. (2004). Ansätze des Kundenwertmanagements. In W. Wirtz & O. Göttgens (Eds.), Integriertes Marken- und Kundenwertmanagement – Strategien, Konzepte und Best Practices. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neue KulmerBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations