Abstract
The German Mittelstand model of the triple helix has been important for facilitating the innovation of small medium enterprises (SMEs) in Germany. Fraunhofer Institutes have provided an innovation intermediary between university research and SME technology. We address the issue of adapting a Mittelstand triple helix from the German national culture into other cultures, particularly to South Korea. For this, we develop a general model of a Mittelstand triple helix.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Betz, F. (1998). Managing Technological Innovation. John Wiley.
Betz, F., Min, W., & Shin, D. W. (2013). Universities and entrepreneurship in Asia: the case of nano. Journal of Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-013-0162-7.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and quadruple helix: toward a 21st century radical innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintile helix and how do knowledge, innovation, and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Technology Management, 1(41–69), 41–69.
Carayannis, E. G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems, Springer Briefs in Business 7.
Federal Ministry of Trade and Economics. (2013). “Mittelstand in Germany: well-financed, innovative, export-oriented”; Germany Trade and Invest. (http://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Content/EN/Invest/_SharedDocs/Downloads/GTAI/BLG/blg-mittelstand-ingermany.pdf).
Freeman, Chris, 1994. “The economics of technical change: a critical survey article”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (5)
Günterberg, B. and Kayser, G. (2004). “SMEs in Germany - facts and figs. 2004”. IfM-Materialien Nr. 161. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung. Retrieved 2012-09-26.
Letzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Meyer-Stamer, Jorg and Wältring, Frank. (2000). “Behind the myth of the Mittelstand economy, The institutional environment supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany”, Institute for Development and Peace at the Gerhard-Mercator-University Duisburg. (http://www.mesopartner.de/fileadmin/user_files/working_papers/INEF_report46_at_www.mesopartner.com.pdf)
OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development. (http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/2101733.pdf)
Power, J., & Choi, I-J. (2013). “How should small business be supported?” Korea Herald. April 8. (http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130408000950).
Robaschik, F. (2013). “Seminar zum deutschen Mittelstand” Deutschen Botschaft in der Republik Korea. March 5. (http://www.seoul.diplo.de/Vertretung/seoul/de/__events/mittelstand-v.html?archive=3765102).
Simon, H. (1996). Hidden champions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Venohr, Bernd. (2010). “The power of uncommon sense management principles -- the secret recipe of German Mittelstand companies”, 2nd Global Drucker Forum Venia 2010, November 18 and 19. (http://www.druckersociety.at/repository/2010/day01/15%2730-17%2700/Venohr_101118_PPT_Beamerversion.pdf)
Venohr, Bernd and Klaus E. Meyer. (2007). “The German miracle keeps running: how Germany’s hidden champions stay ahead in the global economy”, Working Paper 30, FHW Berlin. (http://www.berndvenohr.de/download/veroeffentlichungen/forschung/The_German_Miracle_Keeps_Running.pdf)
Acknowledgments
Prof. Dong-woo Shin appreciates Gyeongsang National University for allowing him a sabbatical year from March, 2012 to February, 2013. And part of this work contributed by Prof. Shin was done during his sabbatical year.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Betz, F., Carayannis, E., Jetter, A. et al. Modeling an Innovation Intermediary System Within a Helix. J Knowl Econ 7, 587–599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0230-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0230-7