Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Innovation Competencies in Firms?

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of how firms develop innovation-related competencies, by looking at innovative firms and their partnerships with universities. We argue that university partnerships are a strategy taken by innovative firms to develop technological competencies and innovation capacity, rather than an approach to source externally developed knowledge. Based on resource dependence theory, we argue that firms of different sizes and investment in R&D have different competence needs, this likely influences the extent to which they collaborate with universities. To investigate this, we carried out a mixed methods study of firms that collaborate with universities to develop innovation competencies by participating in Industry-PhD projects. The analyses show inconsistent results. The qualitative study indicated that small and large firms behave different along the patterns expected. However, analyses based on a survey of firms found that the firms where more similar in their approach to university partnerships than expected; and that development of broader competencies, knowledge in core technological areas, R&D competencies and innovation capability were key results in all firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consult the following web pages for more information:

    CIFRE, FR: http://www.anrt.asso.fr/fr/espace_cifre/accueil.jsp?r=3&p=1

    CASE, UK: http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/skills/students/coll/icase/Pages/intro.aspx

    IPP, SE: http://www.vr.se/inenglish/researchfunding/applyforgrants/callforproposals/closedgrants/industryphdproject.5.4b1cd22413cb479b8054185.html

    Ervervs-PhD, DK: http://fivu.dk/forskning-og-innovation/tilskud-til-forskning-og-innovation/find-danske-tilskudsprogrammer/hojtuddannede-i-virksomheder/erhvervsphd

    Nærings-PhD, NO: http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1253952592767&p=1253952592767&pagename=naeringsphd%2FHovedsidemal

  2. 2.

    The survey was part of a set of three surveys, also including a survey to PhD candidates and the universities involved in 135 industrial PhD projects, but only results from the firm survey will be presented here (see Piro et al 2013 for the results of all three surveys).

  3. 3.

    This categorization was made based on the particular sample which reflects particularities in the Norwegian firm population with many small and micro firms, and do not reflect international standards for classifying firms by size.

References

  1. Abreu, M., et al. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. UK Innovation Research Center. http://ukirc.s24.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/knowledge-exchange1.pdf.

  2. Bekkers, R., & Bodas-Freitas, I. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(2007), 930–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2007). A view from the coal face: UK research student perceptions of successful and unsuccessful collaborative projects. Research Policy, 36, 1239–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”. In A. Geuna, A. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freitas, I. M. B., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partner: Institutional and personal modes of governance and university-industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(2013), 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulbrandsen, M., Mowrey, D., & Feldman, M. (2011). Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and University–Industry Relations. Research Policy, 40(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haagedorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganisational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayton, J. C., Sehili, S., & Scarpello, V. (2010). Why do firms join consortial research centers? An empirical examination of firm, industry and environmental antecedents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kafouros, M., & Buckely, P. (2008). Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations? Research Policy, 37(2), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko, H. T., & Lu, H. P. (2010). Measuring innovation competencies for integrated services in the communications industry. Journal of Service Management, 21(2), 162–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolmos, A., Kofoed, L. B., & Du, X.-Y. (2008). PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5–6), 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation. Research Policy, 33, 1201–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lokshin, B., Van Gils, A., & Bauer, E. (2007). Crafting firm competencies to improve innovative performance. European Management Journal, 27, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R & D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.

  19. Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

  20. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piro, F. N., Tømte, C. E., Rørstad, K., Thune, T. M. (2013). Langsiktig kunnskapsutvikling på næringslivets premisser? Evaluering av Nærings-ph.d.-ordningen. NIFU rapport Nr. 2/2013.

  22. Ramos-Vielba, I., & Fernandez-Esquinas, M. (2011). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university-industry linkages. Higher Education, 64, 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Revilla, A. J., & Fernandez, Z. (2012). The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes. Technovation, 32(11), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Santandreu-Mascarell, Garzon, D., & Knorr, H. (2013). Entrepreneurial and innovation competences, are they the same? Management Decision, 51(5), 1084–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Statistics Norway (2012). R&D Statistics. http://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon?de=Research+and+innovation+in+business+enterprise+sector+.

  28. Thune, T. (2010). The training of “triple helix workers”? Doctoral students in university-industry-government collaborations. Minerva, 48(4), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thune, T., et al. (2012). Produktivt samspill? Forsknings- og innovasjonssamarbeid mellom næringsliv og FoU-miljøer. NIFU rapport 24/2012.

  30. Vila, L., Perez, P., & Coll-Serrano. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter? Journal of Business Research, 67, 752–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wallgren, L., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2005). Doctoral education as social practice for knowledge development. Conditions and demands encountered by industry PhD students. Industry and Higher Education, 19, 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wallgren, L., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2007). Industrial doctoral students as brokers between industry and academia. Industry and Higher Education, 21, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zidorn, W., & Wagner, M. (2012). The effect of alliances on innovation patterns: an analysis of the biotechnology industry. Industrial and corporate change, Desember 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The empirical research reported in this paper was funded by the Norwegian Research Council and the Ministry of Education and Science. Their support to this research is gratefully acknowledged. Fredrik Piro, Cathrine Tømte and Dorothy S. Olsen, all at the Nordic Institute for Studies of Research, Innovation and Education, contributed to data collection. Insightful comments to the paper by participants at a workshop on innovation and competence in Oslo in February 2013, and particularly by Siw Fosstenløkken, contributed to finalising the paper. Any mistakes or omissions remain the responsibly of the authors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taran Thune.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Overview of interviewed firms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thune, T., Børing, P. Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Innovation Competencies in Firms?. J Knowl Econ 6, 385–401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0214-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Firms
  • Competencies
  • Industry PhD