Advertisement

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 385–401 | Cite as

Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Innovation Competencies in Firms?

  • Taran ThuneEmail author
  • Pål Børing
Article

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of how firms develop innovation-related competencies, by looking at innovative firms and their partnerships with universities. We argue that university partnerships are a strategy taken by innovative firms to develop technological competencies and innovation capacity, rather than an approach to source externally developed knowledge. Based on resource dependence theory, we argue that firms of different sizes and investment in R&D have different competence needs, this likely influences the extent to which they collaborate with universities. To investigate this, we carried out a mixed methods study of firms that collaborate with universities to develop innovation competencies by participating in Industry-PhD projects. The analyses show inconsistent results. The qualitative study indicated that small and large firms behave different along the patterns expected. However, analyses based on a survey of firms found that the firms where more similar in their approach to university partnerships than expected; and that development of broader competencies, knowledge in core technological areas, R&D competencies and innovation capability were key results in all firms.

Keywords

Innovation Firms Competencies Industry PhD 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The empirical research reported in this paper was funded by the Norwegian Research Council and the Ministry of Education and Science. Their support to this research is gratefully acknowledged. Fredrik Piro, Cathrine Tømte and Dorothy S. Olsen, all at the Nordic Institute for Studies of Research, Innovation and Education, contributed to data collection. Insightful comments to the paper by participants at a workshop on innovation and competence in Oslo in February 2013, and particularly by Siw Fosstenløkken, contributed to finalising the paper. Any mistakes or omissions remain the responsibly of the authors.

References

  1. Abreu, M., et al. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. UK Innovation Research Center. http://ukirc.s24.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/knowledge-exchange1.pdf.
  2. Bekkers, R., & Bodas-Freitas, I. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(2007), 930–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2007). A view from the coal face: UK research student perceptions of successful and unsuccessful collaborative projects. Research Policy, 36, 1239–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”. In A. Geuna, A. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Freitas, I. M. B., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partner: Institutional and personal modes of governance and university-industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(2013), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gulbrandsen, M., Mowrey, D., & Feldman, M. (2011). Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and University–Industry Relations. Research Policy, 40(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haagedorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganisational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayton, J. C., Sehili, S., & Scarpello, V. (2010). Why do firms join consortial research centers? An empirical examination of firm, industry and environmental antecedents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kafouros, M., & Buckely, P. (2008). Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations? Research Policy, 37(2), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ko, H. T., & Lu, H. P. (2010). Measuring innovation competencies for integrated services in the communications industry. Journal of Service Management, 21(2), 162–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolmos, A., Kofoed, L. B., & Du, X.-Y. (2008). PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5–6), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation. Research Policy, 33, 1201–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lokshin, B., Van Gils, A., & Bauer, E. (2007). Crafting firm competencies to improve innovative performance. European Management Journal, 27, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R & D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.Google Scholar
  19. Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.Google Scholar
  20. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Piro, F. N., Tømte, C. E., Rørstad, K., Thune, T. M. (2013). Langsiktig kunnskapsutvikling på næringslivets premisser? Evaluering av Nærings-ph.d.-ordningen. NIFU rapport Nr. 2/2013.Google Scholar
  22. Ramos-Vielba, I., & Fernandez-Esquinas, M. (2011). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university-industry linkages. Higher Education, 64, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Revilla, A. J., & Fernandez, Z. (2012). The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes. Technovation, 32(11), 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Santandreu-Mascarell, Garzon, D., & Knorr, H. (2013). Entrepreneurial and innovation competences, are they the same? Management Decision, 51(5), 1084–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thune, T. (2010). The training of “triple helix workers”? Doctoral students in university-industry-government collaborations. Minerva, 48(4), 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thune, T., et al. (2012). Produktivt samspill? Forsknings- og innovasjonssamarbeid mellom næringsliv og FoU-miljøer. NIFU rapport 24/2012.Google Scholar
  29. Vila, L., Perez, P., & Coll-Serrano. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter? Journal of Business Research, 67, 752–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wallgren, L., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2005). Doctoral education as social practice for knowledge development. Conditions and demands encountered by industry PhD students. Industry and Higher Education, 19, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wallgren, L., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2007). Industrial doctoral students as brokers between industry and academia. Industry and Higher Education, 21, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zidorn, W., & Wagner, M. (2012). The effect of alliances on innovation patterns: an analysis of the biotechnology industry. Industrial and corporate change, Desember 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Technology, Innovation and CultureUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Nordic Institute for Studies of InnovationResearch and Education (NIFU)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations