Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Innovation Competencies in Firms?
- 282 Downloads
The paper addresses the question of how firms develop innovation-related competencies, by looking at innovative firms and their partnerships with universities. We argue that university partnerships are a strategy taken by innovative firms to develop technological competencies and innovation capacity, rather than an approach to source externally developed knowledge. Based on resource dependence theory, we argue that firms of different sizes and investment in R&D have different competence needs, this likely influences the extent to which they collaborate with universities. To investigate this, we carried out a mixed methods study of firms that collaborate with universities to develop innovation competencies by participating in Industry-PhD projects. The analyses show inconsistent results. The qualitative study indicated that small and large firms behave different along the patterns expected. However, analyses based on a survey of firms found that the firms where more similar in their approach to university partnerships than expected; and that development of broader competencies, knowledge in core technological areas, R&D competencies and innovation capability were key results in all firms.
KeywordsInnovation Firms Competencies Industry PhD
The empirical research reported in this paper was funded by the Norwegian Research Council and the Ministry of Education and Science. Their support to this research is gratefully acknowledged. Fredrik Piro, Cathrine Tømte and Dorothy S. Olsen, all at the Nordic Institute for Studies of Research, Innovation and Education, contributed to data collection. Insightful comments to the paper by participants at a workshop on innovation and competence in Oslo in February 2013, and particularly by Siw Fosstenløkken, contributed to finalising the paper. Any mistakes or omissions remain the responsibly of the authors.
- Abreu, M., et al. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. UK Innovation Research Center. http://ukirc.s24.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/knowledge-exchange1.pdf.
- Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D”. In A. Geuna, A. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.Google Scholar
- Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Piro, F. N., Tømte, C. E., Rørstad, K., Thune, T. M. (2013). Langsiktig kunnskapsutvikling på næringslivets premisser? Evaluering av Nærings-ph.d.-ordningen. NIFU rapport Nr. 2/2013.Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway (2012). R&D Statistics. http://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon?de=Research+and+innovation+in+business+enterprise+sector+.
- Thune, T., et al. (2012). Produktivt samspill? Forsknings- og innovasjonssamarbeid mellom næringsliv og FoU-miljøer. NIFU rapport 24/2012.Google Scholar
- Zidorn, W., & Wagner, M. (2012). The effect of alliances on innovation patterns: an analysis of the biotechnology industry. Industrial and corporate change, Desember 2012.Google Scholar