Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 63–82 | Cite as

Knowledge, Education, and Citizenship in a Pre- and Post-National Age



This article uses ancient views of knowledge and citizenship to defamiliarize contemporary discursive paradigms and to suggest that they can, in some respects, provide a template for rethinking our views of citizenship and of the social function of the humanities. The discourse of the knowledge-based economy is at the heart of contemporary higher education policy. It implies not only the central significance of knowledge production and circulation for the economy, but also the primacy of economic considerations in defining the function of knowledge. By contrast, in the ancient world, the end of education and knowledge was conceptualized in political rather than economic terms, and this primacy of the political over the economic is historically one of the central tenets of a liberal education. Hence, the discourse of the knowledge-based economy itself plays a decisive role in bringing about the current crisis of the humanities. While this crisis cannot be resolved without rethinking the relationship between the economic and the political aspects of society, both philanthropic funding and a discursive engagement with the premises of the knowledge-based economy can constitute pragmatic ways of dealing with the crisis while it lasts.


Discourse Humanities Stoicism Depoliticization of society Concepts of citizenship Liberal education 


  1. Ando, C. (2000). Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. (1869). Culture and anarchy. London: Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bologna work plan 2009–2012 (n.d.). Accessed 28 October 2012.
  5. Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., & Walker, P. (2006). Beyond the hype: intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 633–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conference of Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (2007). Towards the European Higher Education Area: Responding to challenges in a globalised world. Accessed 28 October 2012.
  7. Conference of Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (2009). The Bologna Process 2020: The European Higher Education Area in the new decade.é_April_2009.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2012.
  8. Conference of Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (2012). Making the most of our potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area. Accessed 28 October 2012.
  9. Council on Competitiveness (2011) Ignite 2.0: Voices of American university presidents and national lab directors on manufacturing competitiveness. Accessed 24 August 2012.
  10. Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eikeland, O. (2012). Symbiotic learning systems—reorganising and integrating learning efforts and responsibilities between Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) and Work Places. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4.1 (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, H. (2011). A manly and generous discipline?: classics and generational conflict in eighteenth and early nineteenth century Oxford. History of Universities, 25(2), 143–172.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, H. (2012). Efficiency and counter-revolution: connecting university and civil service reform in the 1850s. History of Education. doi: 10.1080/0046760X.2012.697922.
  14. Ericksen, R. P. (2012). Complicity in the holocaust: churches and universities in Nazi Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faulks, K. (1998). Citizenship in modern Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Godin, B. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  19. Houghton, J., & Sheehan, P. (2000). A primer on the knowledge economy. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University.Google Scholar
  20. Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Challenging the liberal nation–state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 652–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreckel, R. (2012). Habilitation versus tenure: Karrieremodelle an Universitäten im internationalen Vergleich. Forschung und Lehre, 19(1), 12–14.Google Scholar
  23. Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25.Google Scholar
  24. Lazear, E. P. (2006). Speeding, terrorism, and teaching to the test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 1029–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levitas, R. (1986). The ideology of the new right. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. MacLeod, R. M., & Collins, P. (Eds.). (1981). The parliament of science: the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1831–1981. Northwood: Science Reviews.Google Scholar
  28. Menken, K. (2006). Teaching to the test: how no child left behind impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Modood, T., et al. (2003). New forms of Britishness: post-immigration ethnicity and hybridity. In R. Sackmann, B. Peters, & T. Faist (Eds.), Identity and integration: migrants in Western Europe (pp. 77–90). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, T. (1998). Literate education in the Hellenistic and Roman worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Morrell, J., & Thackray, A. (1981). Gentlemen of science: early years of the British association for the advancement of science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  32. Nevett, L. C. (1999). House and society in the ancient Greek world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nussbaum, M., et al. (1996). For love of country? Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (1995). The implications of the knowledge-based economy for future science and technology policies, OCDE/GD(95)136. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perrie, M. (2001). The cult of Ivan the Terrible in Stalin’s Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peters, M. A. (2010). Three forms of the knowledge economy: learning, creativity and openness. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reydams-Schils, G. (2005). The roman stoics: self, responsibility and affection. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Singh, S. H. (2000). Ways and means of bridging the gap between developed and developing countries. High-Level Panel on Information Technology and Public Administration at United Nations, New York. Accessed 2 May 2012.
  41. Smith, M. B., Nowacek, R. S., & Bernstein, J. L. (2010). Citizenship across the curriculum. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures: and a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Soffer, R. N. (1994). Discipline and power: the universities, history and the making of an English elite, 1870–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: international cooperation in the 21st century. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
  45. Stray, C. (1998). Classics transformed: schools, universities and society in England, 1830–1960. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  46. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30, 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thatcher, M. (2003). Reflections on liberty. In S. Pugliese (Ed.), The political legacy of Margaret Thatcher. London: Politico’s.Google Scholar
  48. Vasunia, P. (2005). Greek, Latin and the Indian civil service. Cambridge Classical Journal: Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 51, 35–71.Google Scholar
  49. Walton, W. (2009). Internationalism, national identities, and study abroad: France and the United States, 1890–1970. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for British StudiesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations