Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory investigation into the oil diffusion from submarine pipeline under water flow

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A physical model test has been conducted to study the oil diffusion from the submarine pipeline under water flow. The crude oil in the flume is spilled from a leakage point of the pipeline and diffused from the seabed to the surface. By the non-contact optical measuring technology, an image acquisition and data analysis system is designed to explore the spilled mechanism and characteristic. The oil trajectory, velocity and the rising time to the surface are obtained through this system. The influence of the water flow and the spilled discharge on the behavior of the spilled oil are analyzed from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. The sensitivity study of the characteristic physical quantities to various factors are presented afterward. The spilled oil under water is mainly distributed in the form of the scattered particles with different sizes. The rising process of the oil can be divided into three stages: full, dispersion and aggregation period. The spilled discharge is the primary factor affecting the rising time of the oil particles. In the rising process of the oil particles, the vertical velocity of the oil is mainly affected by the spilled discharge, and the transverse velocity is more dependent on the water velocity. The deviation of the transverse oil velocity is much larger than that of the rising time and the vertical oil velocity. The study can provide a theoretical reference for the prediction system of oil spill emergency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An Wei, Li Jianwei, Zhao Yupeng, et al. 2015. R&D of underwear oil spill numerical simulation and 3D visualization system in deepwater area. Aquatic Procedia, 3: 165–172, doi: 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemporad G A. 1994. Simulation of round buoyant jet in stratified flowing environment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 120(5): 529–543, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:5(529)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandvik P J, Johansen Ø, Leirvik F, et al. 2013. Droplet breakup in subsurface oil releases -part 1: experimental study of droplet breakup and effectiveness of dispersant injection. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 73(1): 319–326, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandvik P J, Lewis A, Strøm-Kristiansen T, et al. 1996. Oil on water exercise–Operational testing of Response 3000D Helibucket. IKU Report No. 41.5164.00/01/96, Sandnes, Norway: NOFO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Yang, Zou Yarong R, Liang Chao, et al. 2016. Research on polarization of oil spill and detection. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 35(3): 84–89, doi: 10.1007/s13131-015-0817-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao Jinlong, Liu Chengyu, Li Ying, et al. 2017. Characteristics of the sea ice reflectance spectrum polluted by oil spills based on field experiments in the Bohai Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(1): 73–79, doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-0995-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneker R L, Jirka G H. 1990. CORMIX1: Expert system for hydrodynamic mixing zone analysis of conventional and toxic submerged single port discharges. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan L N. 1967. Turbulent buoyant jets into stratified or flowing ambient fluids. Report KH-R-18. Pasadena, Calif.: W. M. Keck Laboratory for Hydraulics and Water Resources, California Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanneløp T K, Sjøen K. 1980. Hydrodynamics of underwater blowouts. In: Proceedings of the 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Aerospace Sciences Meetings. Pasadena, CA, USA: AIAA

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Weijun, Hao Yanni, Zhang Li, et al. 2014. Development and application of an oil spill model with wave-current interactions in coastal areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 84(1–2): 213–224, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst E. 1971. Buoyant jets discharged to quiescent stratified ambients. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(30): 7375–7384, doi: 10.1029/JC076i030p07375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst E. 1972. Buoyant jets with three-dimensional trajectories. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 98(HY11): 1999–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Hissong D W, Pomeroy J, Norris H L. 2014. A mechanistic model for hydrocarbon plumes rising through water. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 30: 236–242, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Meirong, Li Zhigang, Yu Jianxing. 2016a. Effect of grid density on numerical result for oil leakage from subsea pipeline. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology) (in Chinese), 49(9): 907–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Meirong, Li Zhigang, Yu Jianxing, et al. 2016b. A k-e turbulence model for subsea pipeline oil spill numerical simulation. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. Rhodes, Greece: ISOPE

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Meirong, Ren Bing, Wang Guoyu. 2015. Laboratory study on the hydrodynamic and structural characteristic of violent sloshing in elastic tanks. Ships and Offshore Structures, 10(5): 533–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen Ø. 2000. DeepBlow: A Lagrangian plume model for deep water blowouts. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 6(2): 103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen Ø, Rye H, Cooper C. 2003. DeepSpill-Field study of a simulated oil and gas blowout in deep water. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 8(5–6): 433–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen Ø, Rye H, Melbye A G, et al. 2001. Deep Spill JIP experimental discharges of gas and oil at Helland Hansen, June 2000, Technical Report. SINTEF Report STF66 F01082, Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Applied Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  • Khelifa A, So L L C. 2009. Effects of chemical dispersants on oil–brine interfacial tension and droplet formation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar, 383–396, Ottawa, Canada: Environment Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd. 2015. The survey report for the deep-water emergency maintenance (in Chinese). National Science and Technology Major Project 27-005-001-003-RPTGE-001. Tianjin: Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd.

  • Rye H, Brandvik P J, Strøm T. 1997. Subsurface blowouts: results from field experiments. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 4(4): 239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rye H, Brandvik P J, Strøm-Kristiansen T, et al. 1996. Oil on water exercise–Simulated blowout, releasing oil and gas at 106 meters depth. IKU Report, Sandnes, Norway: NOFO

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolofsky S A, Adams E E, Boufadel M C, et al. 2015. Intercomparison of oil spill prediction models for accidental blowout scenarios with and without subsea chemical dispersant injection. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 96(1–2): 110–126, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm-Kristiansen T, Daling P S, Brandvik P J. 1996. Dispersant and underwater release experiments. Surface oil sampling an analysis. Data Report. IKU/SINTEF Report No. 41.5141.00/05/95. ESCOST Report No. 25, Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Applied Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Shoudong. 2008. Study on the forecast models for oil spills in seas based on Lagrange tracking (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Yapa P D, Wimalaratne M R, Dissanayake A L, et al. 2012. How does oil and gas behave when released in deepwater? Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 6(4): 275–285, doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Li, Yapa P D. 1998. Simulation of oil spills from underwater accidents II: model verification. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 36(1): 117–134, doi: 10.1080/00221689809498381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Hongjun, Lin Pengzhi, Pan Qian. 2014. A CFD (computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline. Energy, 64: 887–899, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Hongjun, You Jiahui, Zhao Honglei. 2017a. An experimental investigation of underwater spread of oil spill in a shear flow. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 116(1–2): 156–166, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Hongjun, You Jiahui, Zhao Honglei. 2017b. Underwater spreading and surface drifting of oil spilled from a submarine pipeline under the combined action of wave and current. Applied Ocean Research, 64: 217–235, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the constructive and valuable comments and suggestions of the reviewer and the editor. The major part of the present paper was presented at IOSRTS 2017, Tianjin, China, September 18–22, 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meirong Jiang or Yang Yu.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 51609168; the Science and Technology Program of CNOOC Limited under contract No. YXKY-2016-2Y-07; the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering under contract No. LP1608; the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China under contract No. 2014CB046804; the National Science and Technology Major Project under contract No. 2016ZX05057020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, M., Yu, J., Li, Z. et al. Laboratory investigation into the oil diffusion from submarine pipeline under water flow. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 37, 96–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1257-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1257-6

Key words

Navigation