Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 35, Issue 8, pp 32–38 | Cite as

An evaluation of underlying mechanisms for “fishing down marine food webs”

  • Qi Ding
  • Xinjun Chen
  • Wei Yu
  • Siquan Tian
  • Yong Chen
Article

Abstract

Since the concept of “fishing down marine food webs” was first proposed in 1998, mean trophic level of fisheries landings (MTL) has become one of the most widely used indicators to assess the impacts of fishing on the integrity of marine ecosystem and guide the policy development by many management agencies. Recent studies suggest that understanding underlying causes for changes in MTL is vital for an appropriate use of MTL as an indicator of fishery sustainability. Based on the landing data compiled by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and trophic information of relevant species in Fishbase, we evaluated MTL trends in 14 FAO fishing areas and analyzed catches of upper and lower trophic level groups under different trends of MTL and found that both the cases of a recovered MTL trend and a generally increasing MTL trend could be accompanied by decreasing catches of lower trophic level species. Further, community structure and exploitation history should be considered in using MTL after excluding species with trophic levels lower than 3.25 to distinguish “fishingthrough” from “fishing-down”. We conclude that MTL used as an indicator to measure fishery sustainability can benefit from a full consideration of both upper and lower trophic level species and masking effects of community structure and exploitation history.

Keywords

mean trophic level underlying mechanisms community structure and exploitation history fishery landings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainley D G, Blight L K. 2009. Ecological repercussions of historical fish extraction from the Southern Ocean. Fish and Fisheries, 10(1): 13–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alleway H K, Connell S D, Ward T M, et al. 2014. Historical changes in mean trophic level of southern Australian fisheries. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65(10): 884–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arancibia H, Neira S. 2005. Long-term changes in the mean trophic level of Central Chile fishery landings. Scientia Marina, 69(2): 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhathal B, Pauly D. 2008. ‘Fishing down marine food webs’ and spatial expansion of coastal fisheries in India, 1950–2000. Fisheries Research, 91(1): 26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branch T A, Watson R, Fulton E A, et al. 2010. The trophic fingerprint of marine fisheries. Nature, 468(7322): 431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butchart S H M, Walpole M, Collen B, et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982): 1164–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caddy J F, Csirke J, Garcia S M, et al. 1998. How pervasive is “fishing down marine food webs”. Science, 282(5393): 1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caddy J F, Rodhouse P G. 1998. Cephalopod and groundfish landings: evidence for ecological change in global fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 8(4): 431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coll M, Navarro J, Olson R J, et al. 2013. Assessing the trophic position and ecological role of squids in marine ecosystems by means of food-web models. Deep Sea Research Part: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 95: 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cury P M, Shannon L J, Roux J P, et al. 2005. Trophodynamic indicators for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62(3): 430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daskalov G M. 2002. Overfishing drives a trophic cascade in the Black Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 225(1): 53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Essington T E, Beaudreau A H, Wiedenmann J. 2006. Fishing through marine food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(9): 3171–3175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO. 2011. Review of the State of World Marine Fishery Resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 21–226Google Scholar
  14. FAO. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture-2012. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 60Google Scholar
  15. Foley C M R. 2013. Management implications of fishing up, down, or through the marine food web. Marine Policy, 37: 176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank K T, Petrie B, Choi J S, et al. 2005. Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science, 308(5728): 1621–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freire K M F, Pauly D. 2010. Fishing down Brazilian marine food webs, with emphasis on the east Brazil large marine ecosystem. Fisheries Research, 105(1): 57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fulton E A, Smith A D M, Punt A E. 2005. Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing?. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62(3): 540–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gascuel D. 2005. The trophic-level based model: a theoretical approach of fishing effects on marine ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 189(3–4): 315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpern B S, Walbridge S, Selkoe K A, et al. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319(5865): 948–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halpern B S, Longo C, Hardy D, et al. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature, 488(7413): 615–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaureguizar A J, Milessi A C. 2008. Assessing the sources of the fishing down marine food web process in the Argentinean-Uruguayan Common Fishing Zone. Scientia Marina, 72(1): 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings S. 2005. Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 6(3): 212–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleisner K, Zeller D, Froese R, et al. 2013. Using global catch data for inferences on the world’s marine fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 14(3): 293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Litzow M A, Urban D. 2009. Fishing through (and up) Alaskan food webs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 66(2): 201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mutsert K D, Cowan J H, Essington T E, et al. 2008. Reanalyses of Gulf of Mexico fisheries data: landings can be misleading in assessments of fisheries and fisheries ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(7): 2740–2744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pauly D, Christensen V. 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature, 374(6519): 255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, et al. 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science, 279(5352): 860–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pauly D, Christensen V, Walters C. 2000. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57(3): 697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pauly D, Palomares M L, Froese R, et al. 2001. Fishing down Canadian aquatic food webs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(1): 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, et al. 2002. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature, 418(6898): 689–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pauly D, Palomares M L. 2005. Fishing down marine food web: it is far more pervasive than we thought. Bulletin of Marine Science, 76(2): 197–211Google Scholar
  33. Pauly D, Watson R. 2005. Background and interpretation of the ‘Marine Trophic Index’as a measure of biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1454): 415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pecl G T, Jackson G D. 2008. The potential impacts of climate change on inshore squid: biology, ecology and fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 18(4): 373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinsky M L, Jensen O P, Ricard D, et al. 2011. Unexpected patterns of fisheries collapse in the world’s oceans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(20): 8317–8322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rochet M J, Trenkel V M. 2003. Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60(1): 86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Young B. 2005. Cascading effects of overfishing marine systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(11): 579–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sethi S A, Branch T A, Watson R. 2010. Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(27): 12163–12167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tacon A G J, Metian M, Turchini G M, et al. 2010. Responsible aquaculture and trophic level implications to global fish supply. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 18(1): 94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsikliras A C, Dinouli A, Tsiros V Z, et al. 2015. The Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries at risk from overexploitation. PLoS One, 10(3): e0121188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qi Ding
    • 1
    • 4
  • Xinjun Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Wei Yu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Siquan Tian
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yong Chen
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.College of Marine SciencesShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources of Ministry of EducationShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic FisheriesShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Collaborative Innovation Center for Distant-water FisheriesShanghaiChina
  5. 5.School of Marine SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations