Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of multiple annealing and looping based genome amplification using a synthetic bacterial community

Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The low biomass in environmental samples is a major challenge for microbial metagenomic studies. The amplification of a genomic DNA was frequently applied to meeting the minimum requirement of the DNA for a high-throughput next-generation-sequencing technology. Using a synthetic bacterial community, the amplification efficiency of the Multiple Annealing and Looping Based Amplification Cycles (MALBAC) kit that is originally developed to amplify the single-cell genomic DNA of mammalian organisms is examined. The DNA template of 10 pg in each reaction of the MALBAC amplification may generate enough DNA for Illumina sequencing. Using 10 pg and 100 pg templates for each reaction set, the MALBAC kit shows a stable and homogeneous amplification as indicated by the highly consistent coverage of the reads from the two amplified samples on the contigs assembled by the original unamplified sample. Although GenomePlex whole genome amplification kit allows one to generate enough DNA using 100 pg of template in each reaction, the minority of the mixed bacterial species is not linearly amplified. For both of the kits, the GC-rich regions of the genomic DNA are not efficiently amplified as suggested by the low coverage of the contigs with the high GC content. The high efficiency of the MALBAC kit is supported for the amplification of environmental microbial DNA samples, and the concerns on its application are also raised to bacterial species with the high GC content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbai N S, Govender A, Shaik R, et al. 2012. Pyrosequence analysis of unamplified and whole genome amplified DNA from hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater. Molecular Biotechnology, 50(1): 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, et al. 2013. Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nature Biotechnology, 31(6): 533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen A W, Haque K A, Qi Ying, et al. 2005. Comparison of yield and genotyping performance of multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlexTM whole genome amplified DNA generated from multiple DNA sources. Human Mutation, 26(3): 262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean F B, Hosono S, Fang Linhua, et al. 2002. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(8): 5261–5266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean F B, Nelson J R, Giesler T L, et al. 2001. Rapid amplification of plasmid and phage DNA using phi29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle amplification. Genome Research, 11(6): 1095–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Direito S O L, Zaura E, Little M, et al. 2014. Systematic evaluation of bias in microbial community profiles induced by whole genome amplification. Environmental Microbiology, 16(3): 643–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huson D H, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H J, et al. 2011. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Research, 21(9): 1552–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt D, Chen GwoLiang, Locascio P F, et al. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 11(1): 119, doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmead B, Salzberg S L. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods, 9(4): 357–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmore J P. 2002. Rubicon Genomics, Inc. Pharmacogenomics, 3(4): 557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasken R S, Stockwell T B. 2007. Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction. BMC Biotechnology, 7(1): 19, doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-7-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Heng, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/ map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16): 2078–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logares R, Haverkamp T H A, Kumar S, et al. 2012. Environmental microbiology through the lens of high-throughput DNA sequencing: Synopsis of current platforms and bioinformatics approaches. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 91(1): 106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel R K, Jain M. 2012. NGS QC toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. Plos One, 7(2): e30619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinard R, de Winter A, Sarkis G J, et al. 2006. Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing. BMC Genomics, 7(1): 216, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan A, Ferguson H R Jr, Bornarth C J, et al. 2005. Genomic DNA amplification from a single bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(6): 3342–3347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Binhai, Arunpairojana V, Palakawong S, et al. 2002. Tistrella mobilis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel polyhydroxyalkanoate-producing bacterium belonging to a-Proteobacteria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 48(6): 335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh W Y, Lin Yute, Jean W D. 2004. Pseudovibrio denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine, facultatively anaerobic, fermentative bacterium capable of denitrification. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 54(6): 2307–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J T, Wong K, Jackman S D, et al. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Research, 19(6): 1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spits C, Le Caignec C, De Rycke M, et al. 2006. Optimization and evaluation of single-cell whole-genome multiple displacement amplification. Human Mutation, 27(5): 496–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uda A, Tanabayashi K, Fujita O, et al. 2007. Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for detecting pathogenic bacterial genomic DNA using microarray. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 60(6): 355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S, Allgaier M, Hugenholtz P. 2010. Multiple displacement amplification compromises quantitative analysis of metagenomes. Nature Methods, 7(12): 943–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Kun, Martiny A C, Reppas N B, et al. 2006. Sequencing genomes from single cells by polymerase cloning. Nature Biotechnology, 24(6): 680–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong Chenghang, Lu Sijia, Chapman A R, et al. 2012. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Science, 338(6114): 1622–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peiyuan Qian.

Additional information

Foundation item: The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) under contract Nos XDB06010100 and XDB06010200; the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China under contract No. 2012CB417304; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. U1301232; the Sanya Institute of Deep Sea Science and Engineering under contract Nos SIDSSE- 201206, SIDSSE-BR-201303 and SIDSSE-201305; the award from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology under contract No. SAC0040/ UK-C0016.

Equal contribution to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Gao, Z., Xu, Y. et al. An evaluation of multiple annealing and looping based genome amplification using a synthetic bacterial community. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 35, 131–136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0781-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0781-x

Key words

Navigation