Abstract
A time splitting technique is common to many free surface ocean models. The different truncation errors in the equations of the internal and external modes require a numerical adjustment to make sure that algorithms correctly satisfy continuity equations and conserve tracers quantities. The princeton ocean model (POM) has applied a simple method of adjusting the vertical mean of internal velocities to external velocities at each internal time step. However, due to the Asselin time filter method adopted to prevent the numerical instability, the method of velocity adjustment used in POM can no longer guarantee the satisfaction of the continuity equation in the internal mode, though a special treatment is used to relate the surface elevation of the internal mode with that of the external mode. The error is proved to be a second-order term of the coefficient in the Asselin filter. One influence of this error in the numerical model is the failure of the kinetic boundary condition at the sea floor. By a regional experiment and a quasi-global experiment, the magnitudes of this error are evaluated, and several sensitivity tests of this error are performed. The characteristic of this error is analyzed and two alternative algorithms are suggested to reduce the error.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. 1967. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM Journal, 3: 215–234
Da Silva A, Young C, Levitus S. 1994. Atlas of Surface Marine Data 1994, vol. 1, Algorithms and Procedures. Washington D C, US: Dep of Commer, 74
Ezer T, Arango H, Shchepetkin A F. 2002. Developments in terrainfollowing ocean models: intercomparison of numerical aspects. Ocean Modell, 4: 249–267
Higdon R L, Bennett A F. 1996. Modeling, stability analysis of operator for large-scale ocean modeling. J Comput Phys, 123: 311–329
Higdon R L, de Szoeke R A. 1997. Barotropic-baroclinic time splitting for ocean circulation modeling. J Comput Phys, 135: 31–53
Kantha L H, Clayson C A. 2000. Numerical Models of Oceans and Oceanic Processes. San Diego: Academic Press, 750
Mellor G L. 2003. Users Guide for a Three-dimensional, Primitive Equation, Numerical Ocean Model. June 2003 version. Princeton: Princeton University, 56
Munk W. 1966. Abyssal recipes. Deep-Sea Res, 13: 707–730
Shchepetkin A F, McWilliams J C. 2005. The regional ocean modeling system: A split-explicit, free-surface, topography following coordinates ocean model. Ocean Modell, 9: 347–404
Wunsch C, Ferrari R. 2004. Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 36: 281–314
Xia Changshui, Qiao Fangli, Yang Yongzeng, et al. 2006. Threedimensional structure of the summertime circulation in the Yellow Sea from a wave-tide-circulation coupled model. J Geophys Res, 111: C11S–C13S
Xia Changshui, Qiao Fangli, Zhang Qinghua, et al. 2004. Numerical modeling of the quasi-global ocean circulation based on POM. J Hydrodyn: Ser B, 16: 537–543
Zhou Weidong. 2002. A proper time integration with split stepping for the explicit free-surface modeling. Adv Atmos Sci, 19: 255–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 40906017 and 41376038; the National “863” Project of China under contract No. 2013AA09A506; the National Key Scientific Research Projects of China under contract No. 2012CB955601; the Special Projects on Public Sector under contract Nos 200905024 and 201409089.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, L. An error evaluation on the vertical velocity algorithm in POM. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 33, 12–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0505-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0505-7