Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance in the Arctic Ocean

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diffuse attenuation coefficient (K d) for downwelling irradiance is calculated from solar irradiance data measured in the Arctic Ocean during 3rd and 4th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition (CHINARE), including 18 stations and nine stations selected for irradiance profiles in sea water respectively. In this study, the variation of attenuation coefficient in the Arctic Ocean was studied, and the following results were obtained. First, the relationship between attenuation coefficient and chlorophyll concentration in the Arctic Ocean has the form of a power function. The best fit is at 443 nm, and its determination coefficient is more than 0.7. With increasing wavelength, the determination coefficient decreases abruptly. At 550 nm, it even reaches a value lower than 0.2. However, the exponent fitted is only half of that adapted in low-latitude ocean because of the lower chlorophyll-specific absorption in the Arctic Ocean. The upshot was that, in the case of the same chlorophyll concentration, the attenuation caused by phytoplankton chlorophyll in the Arctic Ocean is lower than in low-latitude ocean. Second, the spectral model, which exhibits the relationship of attenuation coefficients between 490 nm and other wavelength, was built and provided a new method to estimate the attenuation coefficient at other wavelength, if the attenuation coefficient at 490 nm was known. Third, the impact factors on attenuation coefficient, including sea ice and sea water mass, were discussed. The influence of sea ice on attenuation coefficient is indirect and is determined through the control of entering solar radiation. The linear relationship between averaging sea ice concentration (ASIC, from 158 Julian day to observation day) and the depth of maximum chlorophyll is fitted by a simple linear equation. In addition, the sea water mass, such as the ACW (Alaskan Coastal Water), directly affects the amount of chlorophyll through taking more nutrient, and results in the higher attenuation coefficient in the layer of 30–60 m. Consequently, the spectral model of diffuse attenuation coefficient, the relationship between attenuation coefficient and chlorophyll and the linear relationship between the ASIC and the depth of maximum chlorophyll, together provide probability for simulating the process of diffuse attenuation coefficient during summer in the Arctic Ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrigo K R, Perovich D K, Pickart R S, et al. 2012. Massive phytoplankton blooms under Arctic Sea ice. Science, 336(6087): 1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo K R, Robinson D H, Worthen D L, et al. 1998. Bio-optical properties of the southern Ross Sea. J Geophys Res, 102(C10): 21683–21695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin R W, Petzold T J. 1981. The determination of the diffuse attenuation coefficient of sea water using the Coastal Zone Color Scanner. In: Gower J F R, ed. Oceanography from Space. New York: Springer US, 239–256

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chang G C, Dickey T D. 2004. Coastal ocean optical influences on solar transmission and radiant heating rate. J Geophys Res, 109: C01020

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Huang Yipu, Guo Laodong, et al. 2002. Biological productivity and carbon cycling in the Arctic Ocean. Chinese Science Bulletin, 17(12): 1037–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cota G F, Harrison W G, Platt T, et al. 2003. Bio-optical properties of the Labrador Sea. J Geophys Res, 108(C7): 3228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey Dommy D, Chang Grace C. 2001. Recent advances and future visions: temporal variability of optical and bio-optical properties of the ocean. Oceanography, 14(3): 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov N G. 1976. Marine Optics. New York: Elsevier, 231

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk J T. 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 400

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M R, Carr M, Feldman G, et al. 1990. Influence of penetrating solar radiation on the heat budget of the equatorial pacific ocean. Nature, 347: 543–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Zilin, Chen Jianfang, Liu YanLan, et al. 2008. The areal characteristics of chlorophylla in sediments and seawater in the surveyed srea, Arctic Ocean. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 26(6): 1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Manizza Manfredi, Le Que’re Corinne, Watson A J, et al. 2005. Biooptical feedbacks among phytoplankton, upper ocean physics and sea-ice in a global model. Geophysical Research Letters, 32: L05603, doi:10.1029/2004GL020778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra J, Langdon C, Knudson C A. 1995. Primary production, water column changes, and the demise of a Phaeocystis bloom at the Marine Light-Mixed Layers site (59°N, 21°W) in the northeast Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res, 100: 6633–6644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka A, Huot Y, Koji Shimada, et al. 2007. Bio-optical characteristics of the western Arctic Ocean: implication for ocean color algorithms. Can J Remote Sensing, 33(6): 503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain C R, Arrigo K, Tai K S, et al. 1996. Observations and simulations of physical and biological processes at ocean weather station P, 1951–1980. J Geophys Res, 101: 3697–3713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B G. 1992. Predictive bio-optical relationships for polar oceans and marginal ice zones. J Mar Syst, 3: 91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley C D. 1994. Light and Water: Optical Properties of Water. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 133

  • Morel Andre. 1988. Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (Case I Waters). J Geophys Res, 93(C9): 10749–10768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Antoine D. 1994. Heating rate within the upper ocean in relation to its bio-optical state. J PhysOceanogr, 24: 1652–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Maritorena S. 2001. Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: A reappraisal. J Geophys Res, 106(C4): 7163–7180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J L, Davis C, Arnone R, et al. 2002. Above water radiance and remote sensing reflectance measurement and analysis protocols. NASA Tech Memo, TM-2002-210004, 171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabi Sudeshna, van Dijken Gert L, Arrigo Kevin R. 2008. Primary production in the Arctic Ocean, 1998–2006. J Geophys Res, 113: C08005

    Google Scholar 

  • Plat T, Rao Subba D V. 1975. Primary production of marine microphysics. In: Cooper J P, ed. Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang H Lee, Terry E Whitledge. 2005. Primary and new production in the deep Canada Basin during summer 2002. Polar Biol, 28: 190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathyendranath S, Gouveia A D, Shetye A R, et al. 1991. Biological control of surface temperature in the Arabian Sea. Nature, 349: 54–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Jiuxin, Zhao Jinping, Jiao Yutian, et al. 2004. Pacific inflow and its links with abnormal variation in the Arctic Ocean. Chinese Journal of Polar Science (in Chinese), 16(3): 253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R C, Baker K S. 1984. Analysis of ocean optical data. In: Blizard Marvin A, ed. Ocean Optics VII. Monterey, USA: SPIE, 119–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R C, Baker K S. 1986. The analysis of ocean optical data. In: Blizard Marvin A, ed. Ocean Optics VIII. Orlando, USA: SPIE, 95–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D A, Ohlmann J C, Washburn L, et al. 1995. Solar radiation, phytoplankton pigments and the radiant heating of the equatorial Pacific warm pool. J Geophys Res, 100: 4885–4891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Jian, Cota Glenn F, Ruble David A. 2005. Absorptions and backscattering in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. J Geophys Res, 110: C04014

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler P A. 1997. Preface: the 1994 Arctic Ocean Section. Deep-Sea Res Part II, 44(8): 1483–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Jinping, Wang Weibo. 2010. Calculation of photosynthetically available radiation using multispectral data in the Arctic. Chinese Journal of Polar Science, 21(2): 113–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weibo Wang.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Basic Science Research Program of Global Change of China under contract No. 2010CB951403.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Zhao, J. Variation of diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance in the Arctic Ocean. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 33, 53–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0489-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0489-3

Key words

Navigation