Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral classification of water masses under the influence of the Amazon River plume

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The large amount of dissolved and particulate material discharged by the Amazon River into the Equatorial Atlantic Ocean cause distinct spectral response of its waters as compared to the nearby ocean waters. This paper shows the application of K-means clustering algorithm for classifying water masses in the region under the Amazon River plume influence according to their spectral behavior. Salinity and temperature data from 67 oceanographic stations were related to Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) remote sensing reflectances values and the following bio-optical products: (i) chlorophyll-a concentration, (ii) water attenuation coefficient and (iii) absorption coefficient for dissolved and detrital material. Four different water masses were identified such as: (1) oceanic water, (2) intermediate oceanic water, (3) intermediate river plume water and (4) Amazon River plume water. The spectral behavior of these water masses allowed concluding that the main active optical component of the waters in the region is the colored dissolved organic matter originated mostly from the Amazon River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison M A, Lee M T, Ogston A S, et al. 2000. Origin of Amazon mudbanks along the northeastern coast of South America. Marine Geology, 163: 241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzer F, Allison M, Fromard F. 2004. Material exchange between the continental shelf and mangrove-fringed coasts with special reference to the Amazon-Guianas coast. Marine Geology, 208: 115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagg M, Benner R, Lohrenz S, et al. 2004. Transformation of dissolved and particulate materials on continental shelves influenced by large rivers: plume processes. Continental Shelf Research, 24: 833–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demaster D J, Pope R H. 1996. Nutrient dynamics in Amazon shelf waters: results from AMASSEDS. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demaster D J, Smith W, Nelson D M, et al. 1996. Biogeochemical processes in Amazon shelf waters: chemical distributions and uptake rates of silicon, carbon and nitrogen. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 617–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froidefond J M, Gardel L, Guiral D L, et al. 2002. Spectral remote sensing reflectances of coastal waters in French Guiana under the Amazon influence. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80: 225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer W R, Beardsley R C, Lentz S J, et al. 1996. Physical oceanography of the Amazon shelf. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 575–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer W R, Hill P S, Kineke G C. 2004. The transport, transformation and dispersal of sediment by buoyant coastal flows. Continental Shelf Research, 24: 927–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Montgomery E T, Schmitt R W, et al. 2004. The dispersal of the Amazon and Orinoco River water in the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean Sea: observation from space and S-PALACE floats. Deep-Sea Research II, 51: 1151–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kineke G C, Sternberg R W, Trowbridgei J H, et al. 1996. Fluid-mud processes on the Amazon continental shelf. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 667–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk J T O. 1983. Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz S J, Limeburner R. 1995. The Amazons River Plume during AMASSEDS: Spatial characteristics and salinity variability. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100: 2355–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihan T, Saitoh S-I, Iida T, et al. 2008. Satellite-measured temporal and spatial variability of the Tokachi River plume. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78: 237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maritorena S P, Siegel D A, Peterson A R. 2002. Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications. Applied Optics, 41: 2705–2714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather P M. 1999. Computer processing of remotely sensed images: an introduction. Chichester. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 292

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell A E. 1971. Multivariate Statistical Methods and Classification Problems. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 119: 121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliman J D, Meade R H. 1983. World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. Journal of Geology, 91: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley C D. 2004. Light and water: radiative transfer in natural waters. San Diego. Academic Press, 593

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Prieur L. 1977. Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnology and Oceanography, 22: 709–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Karger F E, Mcclain C R, Richardson P L. 1988. The dispersal of the Amazon’s water. Nature, 333: 56–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller J L. SeaWiFS Algorithm for Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient, K(490), using Water-leaving Radiances at 490 and 555 nm. In: (Ed.). SeaWiFS Postlaunch Calibration and Validation Analyses: Part 3, Vol. 11

  • NASA Tech, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, v 11, 2000. SeaWiFS Algorithm for Difuse Attenuation Coeficient, K(490), using Water-leaving Radiances at 490 and 555 nm, 4

  • Nittrouer C A, Demaster D J. 1996. The Amazon shelf setting: tropical, energetic, and influenced by a large river. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 553–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’reilly J E, Mueller J L, Mitchell B G, et al. 2000. SeaWiFS Postlaunch Calibration and Validation Analyses. Part 3, v 11. NASA Tech, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 11: 49

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieur L, Sathyendranath S. 1981. An optical classification of coastal and oceanic waters based on the specific spectral absorption curves of phytoplankton pigments, dissolved organic matter, and other particulate materials. Limnology and Oceanography, 26: 671–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey J E, Hedges J I, Devol A H, et al. 1990. Biogeochemistry of carbon in the Amazon River. Limnology and Oceanography, 35: 352–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith W O, Demaster D J. 1996. Phytoplankton biomass and productivity in the Amazon River plume: correlation with seasonal river discharge. Continental Shelf Research, 16: 291–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still S, Bialek W. 2004. How Many Clusters? An Information-Theoretic Perspective. Neural Computation, 16: 2483–2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan P, Steinbach M, Kumar V. 2005. Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley, 769

  • Ternon J F, Oudot C, Dessier A, et al. 2000. A seasonal tropical sink for atmospheric CO2 in the Atlantic ocean: the role of the Amazon River discharge. Marine Chemistry, 68: 183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A C, Weatherbee R A. 2006. Satellite-measured temporal variability of the Columbia River plume. Remote Sensing of Environment, 100: 167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio R D, Subramaniam A. 2004. Influence of the Amazon River on the surface optical properties of the western tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfaillie E, Degraer S, Schelfaut K, et al. 2009. A protocol for classifying ecologically relevant marine zones, a statistical approach. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 83: 175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Souto Fontes Molleri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molleri, G.S.F., Kampel, M. & de Moraes Novo, E.M.L. Spectral classification of water masses under the influence of the Amazon River plume. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 29, 1–8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-010-0031-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-010-0031-1

Key words

Navigation