Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Initial Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer through Colonoscopy or Emergent Surgery-Clinicopathological Features that Support Early Screening

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in the industrial western world and the second cause of cancer death. Its evolution is slow; therefore it constitutes a favourable disease for the application of prevention methods.

Aim

To show the diagnostic process of CRC (colonoscopy or surgery), highlight clinicopathological features associated with diagnosis (tumour stage and size, symptoms, etc) and record certain patient characteristics.

Methods

This study included patients from the prefecture of Drama Greece, who were initially diagnosed with CRC. They were divided into three groups: those who underwent a screening colonoscopy, those who underwent a colonoscopy due to symptoms (diagnostic colonoscopy) and those who were subjected to emergent surgery. Sex, age, symptoms, surgery type, tumour size, stage at diagnosis and habits were investigated.

Results

The study included 52.6% (n=118) male and 47.4% (n=106) female patients. The mean age was 74.6 years. The group of screening colonoscopy included 5.8% of patients, the group of diagnostic colonoscopy 87% and the group of emergent surgery 7.2% of patients. Stage I CRC, with the most favourable prognosis, was diagnosed more frequently in the group of screening colonoscopy than in those of diagnostic colonoscopy and emergent surgery (38.5%, 4.6% and 0% respectively). At least 61.5%, 52.3% and 81.25% of each group respectively had never undergone a screening colonoscopy.

Conclusions

Nearly 95% of the patients were diagnosed after symptom development and had more advanced disease. The contribution of colonoscopy in prompt CRC diagnosis (asymptomatic tumours) is crucial and well-organised screening programs should be applied in the general population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall GM, Shanmugan S, Bleier JI, et al. Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:O51–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kune GA. The Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study: reflections on a 30-year experience. Med J Aust 2010;193:648–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eurostat. Colorectal cancer mortality. [Internet] 2016 [Accessed 2019 May 15]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/health/data.

  5. Paschos KA, Majeed AW, Bird NC. Natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer—pathobiological pathways with clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:3719–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990;61:759–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:481–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Azeem K, Sevcikova J, Kysely Z, et al. Primary and secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic. Prz Gastroenterol 2016;11:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vainio H, Miller AB. Primary and secondary prevention in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol 2003;42:809–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:104–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Colorectal cancer screening: The time to act is now. BMC Med 2015;13:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hellenic Statistical Authority Digital Library (ELSTAT). Social Welfare and Helath. [Internet] [Accessed 2019 July 21]. Available from: http://dlib.statistics.gr/portal/page/portal/ESYE/.

  13. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage; c2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell M, Machin D, Walters S. Medical Statistics. A textbook for the health sciences. 4th ed. London: Wiley; c2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Syriopoulou E, Morris E, Finan PJ, et al. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic differences in colorectal cancer survival: Potential gain in life-years. Br J Cancer 2019; 120:1052–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin D, Cao H, Shah BK, et al. Low detection rate of advanced neoplasia within 5 years after polypectomy of small serrated adenoma. Postgrad Med J 2019;95:187–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Onyoh EF, Hsu WF, Chang LC, et al. The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2019;21:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Puig I, Marmol C, Bustamante M. Endoscopic imaging techniques for detecting early colorectal cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:432–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cardoso R, Niedermaier T, Chen C, et al. Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy use among the average-risk population for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and trend analysis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019;12:617–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paschos KA, Malliarou M, Bamidis P. Population aging a challenge for health and welfare systems- Methods of support for active aging. Scient Chron 2016;21:6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yabroff KR, Mariotto AB, Feuer E, et al. Projections of the costs associated with colorectal cancer care in the United States, 2000–2020. Health Econom 2008;17:947–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smothers L, Hynan L, Fleming J, et al. Emergency surgery for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JA, Kim SY, Park K, et al. Analysis of hospital volume and factors influencing economic outcomes in cancer surgery: Results from a population-based study in Korea. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2017;8:34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah AA, Zafar SN, Ashfaq A, et al. How does a concurrent diagnosis of cancer influence outcomes in emergency general surgery patients? Am J Surg 2016;212:1183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fedirko V, Tramacere I, Bagnardi V, et al. Alcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1958–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moskal A, Norat T, Ferrari P, et al. Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer risk: A dose-response meta-analysis of published cohort studies. Int J Cancer 2007;120:664–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreno CC, Mittal PK, Sullivan PS, et al. Colorectal cancer initial diagnosis: Screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery, and tumor stage and size at initial presentation. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2016;15:67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos A Paschos.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that the study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Also all patients gave their written informed consent prior to their inclusion to the study.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paschos, K.A., Chatzigeorgiadis, A. Initial Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer through Colonoscopy or Emergent Surgery-Clinicopathological Features that Support Early Screening. Hellenic J Surg 92, 51–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-020-0546-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-020-0546-7

Key words

Navigation