Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Choledochoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for common bile duct stones

  • Retrospective Clinical Study
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Aim-Background

The aim is to present the results of a retrospective study comparing a) choledochoscopy in open and laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (CBDE) regarding the clearance of Common Bile Duct (CBD) from stones, b) open CBDE with and without choledochoscopy, and c) transcystic vs. transductal laparoscopic choledochoscopy.

Patients-Methods

Data were extracted from the medical records of 251 patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. We excluded all those undergoing successful ERCP and sphincterotomy. The patients were separated into the following groups

Group A: 127 patients who underwent Open CBDE; subgroup A1 comprised 52 patients who underwent Open CBDE with flexible choledochoscopy and intraoperative cholangiography (open CBDE+FCS+IOC), and Subgroup A2 included 75 patients who underwent Open CBDE with cholangiography (open CBDE+IOC).

Group B: 124 patients who underwent Laparoscopic CBDE; subgroup B1 included 15 patients undergoing transcystic choledochoscopy, and subgroup B2 comprised 109 patients who underwent transductal choledochoscopy.

Results

The stone clearance rate in group A1 (open CBDE +FCS+IOC) was 98%, and in group A2 (open CBDE +IOC) it was 93%. However, the difference in the success rate between the choledochoscopic and “blind” technique was of no statistical significance (p=0.235). Similarly, no statistical significance was found between the success rates of open (98%) vs. laparoscopic (94%) choledochoscopy (p=0.869), or transcystic (Group B1) vs. transductal (GroupB2) laparoscopic choledochoscopy (87% vs. 95% respectively) (p=0.207), although greater success was noted in favour of transductal choledochoscopy. The conversion rate of transductal laparoscopic CBDE was 8%, and the main reason for conversion was stone impaction.

Conclusion

No statistical difference is noted in stone clearance rate between flexible choledochoscopy (FCS) and intraoperative cholangiography. However, intraoperative cholangiography has better outcomes regarding stone clearance when it is assisted by choledochoscopy. A search of the literature found no available data comparing the success rate of open vs. laparoscopic choledochoscopy. Our study demonstrated that the difference in the stone clearance rate between the two approaches was not statistically significant. Laparoscopic transcystic CBDE is less invasive and is associated with a lower complication rate, but it has higher failure rates compared to the transductal approach, although the difference is of no statistical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freitas ML, Bell RL, Duffy AJ: Choledocholithiasis: Evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:3162–3167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hungness ES, Soper NJ: Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:612–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyass S, Phillips EH: Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2006;20 Suppl 2:S441–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chander J, Vindal A, Lal P, Gupta N, Ramteke VK: Laparoscopic management of cbd stones: An indian experience. Surg Endosc 2011;25:172–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright BE, Freeman ML, Cumming JK, Quickel RR, Mandal AK: Current management of common bile duct stones: Is there a role for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a single-stage procedure? Surgery 2002;132:729–735; discussion 735–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Topal B, Aerts R, Penninckx F: Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2317–2321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K: Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: Transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9:206–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campagnacci R, Baldoni A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, De Sanctis A, Di Emiddio M, Guerrieri M: Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step? Surg Endosc 2010;24:547–553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R: Sages guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2368–2386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sgourakis G, Lanitis, S, Zaphiriadou, P, Korontzi, M, Kontovounisios, Ch, Karaliotas, Ch, Karaliotas, Ch, C.: A retrospective case — control study of one stage laparoscopic vs endoscopic first management if common bile duct stones. Hellenic Journal of Surgery 2012;84:41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce RA, Jonnalagadda S, Spitler JA, Tessier DJ, Liaw JM, Lall SC, Melman LM, Frisella MM, Todt LM, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, Edmundowicz SA, Matthews BD: Incidence of residual choledocholithiasis detected by intraoperative cholangiography at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients having undergone preoperative ercp. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2365–2372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marin Lopez ER, Cesin-Sanchez R, Roman GR, Gomez C: Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:492–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore KB, Adrales GL, Mastrangelo MJ, Jr.: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Curr Surg 2004;61:294–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Perretta S, Lezoche E: Thirteen years’ experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results. Surg Endosc 2007;21:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wenner DE, Whitwam P, Rosser J, Hashmi S, Wenner DE, 3rd: A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing lcbde. Surg Endosc 2005;19:120–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vecchio R, MacFayden, BV: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2002;387:45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petelin JB: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1705–1715.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cushieri A, Lazoche, E, Morino, M: Eaes multicenter prospective randomised trial comparing two-stage vs single stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:927–952.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Lezoche E: Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2005;19:705–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karaliotas C, Sgourakis G, Goumas C, Papaioannou N, Lilis C, Leandros E: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1826–1831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Savita KS, Bhartia VK: Laparoscopic cbd exploration. Indian J Surg 2010;72:395–399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zinner JM, Ashley, W.S.: Maingot’s abdominal operations. 11th edition 2007

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Lorenz D: Value and consequences of routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:154–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai H, Sun D, Sun Y, Bai J, Zhao H, Miao Y: Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy. World J Surg 2012;36:164–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M: Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011;99:160–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wood T, MacFadyen Jr., B.V.: Diagnostic and therapeutic choledochoscopy. Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery 2000;7:288–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Riciardi R, Islam S, Canete JJ, Arcand PL, Stoker ME: Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003;17:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rojas Ortega S, Arizpe Bravo D, Marin Lopez E, Cesin Sanchez R, San Roman GR: [exploration of biliary tracts for laparoscopy for treatment of choledocholithiasis]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004;69 Suppl 3:112–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM: Postoperative ercp versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: A randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:188–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelly MD: Results of laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 2010;80:694–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL: Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Santo MA, Domene CE, Riccioppo D, Barreira L, Takeda FR, Pinotti HW: Common bile duct stones: Analysis of the videolaparoscopic surgical treatment. Arq Gastroenterol 2012;49:41–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 2nd Surgical Department and Unit of Surgical Oncology Korgialenio-Benakio, Red Cross Athens General Hospital, Athens, Greece

    M. I. Korontzi, Ch. Karaliotas, G. Sgourakis, S. Lanitis & C. Karaliotas

Authors
  1. M. I. Korontzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ch. Karaliotas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Sgourakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Lanitis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Karaliotas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. I. Korontzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korontzi, M.I., Karaliotas, C., Sgourakis, G. et al. Choledochoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for common bile duct stones. Hellenic J Surg 84, 347–355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0051-8

Key words

Search

Navigation