Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metabolic dependency of non-small cell lung cancer cells affected by three-dimensional scaffold and its stiffness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment is an important regulator of the stiffness of the tumors. Cancer cells require heterogeneous metabolic phenotypes to cope with resistance in the malignant process. However, how the stiffness of the matrix affects the metabolic phenotypes of cancer cells, is lacking. In this study, the young’s modulus of the synthesized collagen-chitosan scaffolds was adjusted according to the percentage ratio of collagen to chitosan. We cultured non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells in four different microenvironments (two-dimensional (2D) plates, stiffest 0.5–0.5 porous collagen-chitosan scaffolds, middle stiff 0.5–1 porous collagen-chitosan scaffolds, and softest 0.5–2 porous collagen-chitosan scaffolds) to investigate the influence of the difference of 2D and 3D cultures as well as the 3D scaffolds with different stiffnesses on the metabolic dependency of NSCLC cells. The results revealed that NSCLC cells cultured in 3D collagen-chitosan scaffolds displayed higher capacity of mitochondrial metabolism and fatty acid metabolism than that cultured in 2D culture. The metabolic response of NSCLC cells is differential for 3D scaffolds with different stiffnesses. The cells cultured in middle stiff 0.5–1 scaffolds displayed a higher potential of mitochondrial metabolism than that of stiffer 0.5–0.5 scaffolds and softer 0.5–2 scaffolds. Furthermore, NSCLC cells culture in 3D scaffolds displayed drug resistance compared with that in 2D culture which maybe via the hyperactivation of the mTOR pathway. Moreover, the cells cultured in 0.5–1 scaffolds showed higher ROS levels, which were counterbalanced by an equally high expression of antioxidant enzymes when compared to the cells grown in 2D culture, which may be regulated by the increased expression of PGC-1α. Together, these results demonstrate that differences in the microenvironments of cancer cells profoundly impact their metabolic dependencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Beloueche-Babari M, Casals Galobart T, Delgado-Goni T et al (2020) Monocarboxylate transporter 1 blockade with AZD3965 inhibits lipid biosynthesis and increases tumour immune cell infiltration. Br J Cancer 122:895–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Boroughs LK, DeBerardinis RJ (2015) Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat Cell Biol 17:351–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Zhou L, Xu H et al (2020) Effect of the Application of a Dehydrothermal Treatment on the Structure and the Mechanical Properties of Collagen Film. Materials (Basel) 13:377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen W-L, Jin X, Wang M et al (2020) GLUT5-mediated fructose utilization drives lung cancer growth by stimulating fatty acid synthesis and AMPK/mTORC1 signaling. JCI Insight 5:e131596

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox TR (2021) The matrix in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 21:217–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox TR, Erler JT (2011) Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis Model Mech 4:165–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cukierman E, Bassi DE (2010) Physico-mechanical aspects of extracellular matrix influences on tumorigenic behaviors. Semin Cancer Biol 20(3):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.04.004

  8. Cunningham JT, Rodgers JT, Arlow DH et al (2007) mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1–PGC-1α transcriptional complex. Nature 450:736–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Currie E, Schulze A, Zechner R et al (2013) Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab 18:153–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson SM, Papagiannakopoulos T, Olenchock BA et al (2016) Environment impacts the metabolic dependencies of Ras-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Metab 23:517–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Faubert B, Solmonson A, DeBerardinis RJ (2020) Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science (80- ) 368:eaaw5473

  12. Gao Y, Peng K, Mitragotri S (2021) Covalently Crosslinked Hydrogels via Step-Growth Reactions: Crosslinking Chemistries, Polymers, and Clinical Impact. Adv Mater 33:2006362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorrini C, Harris IS, Mak TW (2013) Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:931–947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu L, Mooney DJ (2016) Biomaterials and emerging anticancer therapeutics: engineering the microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer 16:56–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guri Y, Hall MN (2016) mTOR signaling confers resistance to targeted cancer drugs. Trends Cancer 2:688–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashida T, Wu M-H, Pierce A et al (2007) MAP-kinase activity necessary for TGF$β$1-stimulated mesangial cell type I collagen expression requires adhesion-dependent phosphorylation of FAK tyrosine 397. J Cell Sci 120:4230–4240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He Q, Yang C, Xiang Z et al (2022) LINC00924-induced fatty acid metabolic reprogramming facilitates gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis via hnRNPC-regulated alternative splicing of Mnk2. Cell Death Dis 13:987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Honeder S, Tomin T, Nebel L et al (2021) Adipose Triglyceride lipase loss promotes a metabolic switch in A549 non–small cell lung cancer cell spheroids. Mol Cell Proteomics 20:100095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Janmey PA, Miller RT (2011) Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. J Cell Sci 124:9–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapałczyńska M, Kolenda T, Przybyła W et al (2018) 2D and 3D cell cultures–a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch Med Sci 14:910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim I-Y, Seo S-J, Moon H-S et al (2008) Chitosan and its derivatives for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol Adv 26:1–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li X, Wang J (2020) Mechanical tumor microenvironment and transduction: cytoskeleton mediates cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Int J Biol Sci 16:2014–2028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Huang Q, Long X et al (2015) CD147 reprograms fatty acid metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through Akt/mTOR/SREBP1c and P38/PPARα pathways. J Hepatol 63:1378–1389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu T, Sun L, Wang Z et al (2019) Fatty acid synthase enhances colorectal cancer cell proliferation and metastasis via regulating AMPK/mTOR pathway. Onco Targets Ther 12:3339–3347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Madak-Erdogan Z, Band S, Zhao YC et al (2019) Free Fatty Acids Rewire Cancer Metabolism in Obesity-Associated Breast Cancer via Estrogen Receptor and mTOR Signaling. Cancer Res 79:2494–2510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martinez-Pacheco S, O’Driscoll L (2021) Pre-Clinical In Vitro Models Used in Cancer Research: Results of a Worldwide Survey. Cancers (Basel) 13:6033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohammadi H, Sahai E (2018) Mechanisms and impact of altered tumour mechanics. Nat Cell Biol 20:766–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen-Ngoc K-V, Cheung KJ, Brenot A et al (2012) ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2595–E2604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozel D, Bayraktarli RY, Coskun ZU Re: Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol 193:7947–800

  30. Padanad MS, Konstantinidou G, Venkateswaran N et al (2016) Fatty acid oxidation mediated by Acyl-CoA synthetase long chain 3 is required for mutant KRAS lung tumorigenesis. Cell Rep 16:1614–1628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Park JS, Burckhardt CJ, Lazcano R et al (2020) Mechanical regulation of glycolysis via cytoskeleton architecture. Nature 578:621–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA et al (2012) The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 7:757–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raftery RM, Woods B, Marques ALP et al (2016) Multifunctional biomaterials from the sea: Assessing the effects of chitosan incorporation into collagen scaffolds on mechanical and biological functionality. Acta Biomater 43:160–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramanathan A, Schreiber SL (2009) Direct control of mitochondrial function by mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:22229–22232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Salvi AM, DeMali KA (2018) Mechanisms linking mechanotransduction and cell metabolism. Curr Opin Cell Biol 54:114–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Samani A, Zubovits J, Plewes D (2007) Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys Med Biol 52:1565–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schieber M, Chandel NS (2014) ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol 24:R453–R462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Soo JY-C, Jansen J, Masereeuw R, Little MH (2018) Advances in predictive in vitro models of drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Nat Rev Nephrol 14:378–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. St-Pierre J, Drori S, Uldry M et al (2006) Suppression of reactive oxygen species and neurodegeneration by the PGC-1 transcriptional coactivators. Cell 127:397–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Szatrowski TP, Nathan CF (1991) Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells. Cancer Res 51:794–798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tan W, Krishnaraj R, Desai TA (2001) Evaluation of nanostructured composite collagen–chitosan matrices for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 7:203–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tanner LB, Goglia AG, Wei MH et al (2018) Four key steps control glycolytic flux in mammalian cells. Cell Syst 7:49–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK (2016) Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 97:4–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ulrich TA, de Juan Pardo EM, Kumar S (2009) The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 69:4167–4174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vazquez F, Lim J-H, Chim H et al (2013) PGC1α expression defines a subset of human melanoma tumors with increased mitochondrial capacity and resistance to oxidative stress. Cancer Cell 23:287–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu K, Xia P, Chen X et al (2023) ncRNA-mediated fatty acid metabolism reprogramming in HCC. Trends Endocrinol Metab 6:S1043-2760

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yang Y, Ishak Gabra MB, Hanse EA et al (2019) MiR-135 suppresses glycolysis and promotes pancreatic cancer cell adaptation to metabolic stress by targeting phosphofructokinase-1. Nat Commun 10:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yu H, Mouw JK, Weaver VM (2011) Forcing form and function: biomechanical regulation of tumor evolution. Trends Cell Biol 21:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang F, Wang M, She Z et al (2015) Collagen/chitosan based two-compartment and bi-functional dermal scaffolds for skin regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 52:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wellman P, Howe RD, Dalton E, Kern KA (1999) Breast tissue stiffness in compression is correlated to histological diagnosis. Harvard BioRobotics Lab Tech Rep 1

Download references

Acknowledgements

Xiaorong Fu acknowledges support from the China Scholarship Council (grant number 201906050131).

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science under the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (No. 17H06146).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X. F.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing- review, and editing. Y. K.: Resources, Investigation, Methodology, Writing–Review, and Editing. Y. T.: Resources, writing–review, and editing. G. S.: Resources, writing review, and editing. Y. J.: Conceptualization, supervision, writing–original draft, writing–review & editing, funding acquisition. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Ju.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• The microenvironment of 3D collagen-chitosan scaffolds reprograms the metabolic requirement of NSCLC cells.

• NSCLC cells cultured in 3D collagen-chitosan scaffolds revealed higher capacity of mitochondrial metabolism and fatty acid metabolism than that cultured in 2D plate.

• Metabolic dependency of NSCLC cells responded to the change of stiffness of 3D scaffolds

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, X., Kimura, Y., Toku, Y. et al. Metabolic dependency of non-small cell lung cancer cells affected by three-dimensional scaffold and its stiffness. J Physiol Biochem 79, 597–611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-023-00960-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-023-00960-6

Keywords

Navigation