Skip to main content
Log in

Nonnegative matrix factorization with manifold regularization and maximum discriminant information

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully used in different applications including computer vision, pattern recognition and text mining. NMF aims to decompose a data matrix into the product of two matrices (respectively denoted as the basis vectors and the encoding vectors), whose entries are constrained to be nonnegative. Unlike the ordinary NMF, we propose a novel NMF, denoted as MMNMF, which considers both geometrical information and discriminative information hidden in the data. The geometrical information is discovered by minimizing the distance among the encoding vectors, while the discriminative information is uncovered by maximizing the distance among base vectors. Clustering experiments are performed on the real-world data sets of faces, images, and documents to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/CAVE/software/softlib/coil-20.php.

References

  1. Paatero P, Tapper U (1994) Positive matrix factorization—a nonnegative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 5(2):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization. Nature 401:788–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyvärinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13(4–5):411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E (2001) Independent component analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu W, Liu X, Gong Y (2003) Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. Proc. ACM Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp 267–273

  6. Pauca VP, Shahnaz F, Berry M, Plemmons R (2004) Text mining using non-negative matrix factorization. Proc. SIAM Int’l Conf. Data Mining, pp 452–456

  7. Li S, Hou X, Zhang H, Cheng Q (2001) Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation. Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 207–212

  8. Shahnaza F, Berrya MW, Paucab V, Plemmonsb RJ (2006) Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Inf Process Manage 42(2):373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pascual-Montano A, Carazo JM, Kochi K, Lehmann D, Pascual-Marqui RD (2006) Nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF). IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(3):403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai D, He X, Han J, Huang T (2011) Graph regularized non-negative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(8):1548–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding C, Li T, Jordan MI (2010) Convex and semi-nonnegative matrix factorizations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guan NY, Tao DC, Luo ZG, Yuan B (2011) Manifold regularized discriminative nonnegative matrix factorization with fast gradient descent. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(7):2030–2048

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui JR, Wen JJ, Li ZM, Li B (2015) Discriminant non-negative graph embedding for face recognition. Neurocomputing 149:1451–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Jim JY, Bensmail H, Gao X (2013) Multiple graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization”. Pattern Recogn 46(10):2840–2847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang S, Yi Z, Ye M, He X (2014) Convergence analysis of graph regularized non-negative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(9):2151–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rao CR (1948) The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification, J R Statis Soci Series B 10(2):159–203

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee DD, Seung HS (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, MIT Press, USA

  19. MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, pp 281–297

  20. He X, Niyogi P (2003) Locality preserving projections. Proceeding in Conference Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS)

  21. M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, “Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, pp. 585-591, MIT Press, 2001

  22. Fan R. K. Chung, Spectral Graph Theory, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, no. 92, 1997

  23. He X, Cai D, Yan S, Zhang H (2005) Neighborhood preserving embedding. Proceeding in International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

  24. Lin CJ (2007) On the convergence of multiplicative update algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 18(6):1589–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):888–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Z, Leahy R (1993) An optimal graph theoretic approach to data clustering: theory and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1101–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lovasz L, Plummer M (1986) Matching Theory. Akadémiai Kiadó, North Holland

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai D, He X, Han J (2005) Document clustering using locality preserving indexing. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(12):1624–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang XZ, Xing HJ, LI Y, Hua Q et al (2014) A study on relationship between generalization abilities and fuzziness of base classifiers in ensemble learning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2371479

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang XZ, Dong LC, Yan JH (2012) Maximum ambiguity-based sample selection in fuzzy decision tree induction. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24(8):1491–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang XZ, Dong CR (2009) Improving generalization of fuzzy if-then rules by maximizing fuzzy entropy. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(3):556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council under Grant PolyU 5134/12E; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61170122, 61272210 and 61202311; the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grants LY13F020011, LY14F010010 and LY14F020009; the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under Grant 13YJAZH084; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grants BK2011003 and BK2011417; the Natural Science Foundation of Huzhou City under Grant 2013YZ05; Huzhou University science research project under Grants KX24063 and KX24058.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjun Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, W., Choi, KS., Tao, J. et al. Nonnegative matrix factorization with manifold regularization and maximum discriminant information. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 6, 837–846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0396-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0396-8

Keywords

Navigation