Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous closure of residual atrial septal defect after surgical closure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residual atrial septal defect (ASD) after surgical closure is rare, but some cases are seen during follow-up period. Redo surgery for residual ASD is often declined, while percutaneous closure can be acceptable. However, the indication of percutaneous closure for residual ASD has not been established. We reviewed our experience with percutaneous closure of residual ASD using medical and procedural records. Between 2006 and 2018, residual ASD was seen in seven patients. The median age of patients was 66 years (range 50–81 years), and the median period after surgical closure of ASD was 39 years (range 13–48 years). All patients had symptoms related to ASD. Percutaneous closure of residual ASD was successfully performed in all seven patients. No residual shunts were detected during the median follow-up period of 4.2 years (range 0.5–11 years) after percutaneous closure. Based on transesophageal echocardiographic findings and operative records for surgical closure, we considered two mechanisms causing residual ASD, such as the tear of surgical suture line and the overlooking of defect during surgical closure. Percutaneous closure of residual ASD was safely performed without any complications, suggesting that percutaneous is an effective therapeutic strategy for residual ASD after surgical closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murphy JG, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, et al. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27–32 years. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1645–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of grownup congenital heart diseases (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2915–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chessa M, Butera G, Giamberti A, Bini RM, Carminati M. Transcatheter closure of residual atrial septal defects after surgical closure. J Inetrv Cardiol. 2002;15:187–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhong-Dong D, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults. Results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. JACC. 2002;39:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01862-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuzoe H, Tanaka H, Hatazawa K, Hatani Y, Matsumoto K, Shinke T, Hirata Kl. Transcatheter closure for residual atrial septal defect resulting from surgical patch closure 44 years previously. J Echocardiogr. 2018;16(3):150–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-017-0368-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soichiro Ogura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogura, S., Takaya, Y., Akagi, T. et al. Percutaneous closure of residual atrial septal defect after surgical closure. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 36, 256–259 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-020-00671-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-020-00671-5

Keywords

Navigation