Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary plaque characteristics that indicate distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina-virtual histology intravascular ultrasound study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distal embolization (DE) is a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable angina. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the coronary plaque characteristics that indicate DE during PCI in patients with stable angina using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS). Three hundred and sixty-four consecutive stable angina patients who underwent PCI were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients exhibiting DE (DE group, n = 10) and patients without DE (non-DE group, n = 354). Coronary plaque compositions were assessed by VH-IVUS. The fibro-fatty (FF) ratio (28 ± 17 vs. 11 ± 9 %, p < 0.0001) was higher in the DE group compared with the non-DE group. The best cut-off value of FF ratio for prediction of DE was 20 %, with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.81 (odds ratio; 17.1, 95 % confidence interval 3.56–82.5, p = 0.0004). Coronary plaques with a high FF ratio may be the predictor of indicating DE in patients with stable angina during PCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartorelli AL, Koh TH, DiPede F, Reimers B, Thuesen L, Amann F, et al. Distal embolic protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: RUBY study. Acute Card Care. 2006;8:148–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorog DA. The role of distal myocardial protection devices during percutaneous coronary interventions. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007;9:52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fokkema ML, Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, Vogelzang M, Amo D, Diercks GF, et al. Incidence and clinical consequences of distal embolization by the coronary angiogram after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:908–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters RJ, Kok WE, Havenith MG, Rijsterborgh H, van der Wal AC, Visser CA. Histopathologic validation of intracoronary ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1994;7:230–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation. 2002;106:2200–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nair A, Calvetti D, Vince DG. Regularized autoregressive analysis of intravascular ultrasound backscatter: improvement in spatial accuracy of tissue maps. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:420–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernandez-Avilies F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nair A, Kuban BD, Obuchowski N, Vince DG. Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:1319–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Falk E. Stable versus unstable atherosclerosis. Clinical aspects. Am Heart J. 1999;138:S421–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the unstable plaque. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002;44:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Vince DG, Virmani R, Surmely JF, et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2405–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmermund A, Erbel R. Unstable coronary plaque and its relation to coronary calcium. Circulation. 2001;104:1682–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawaguchi R, Oshima S, Jingu M, Tsurugaya H, Toyama T, Hoshizaki H, et al. Usefulness of virtual histology intravascular ultrasound to predict distal embolization for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1641–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawamoto T, Okura H, Koyama Y, Toda I, Taguchi H, Tamita K, et al. The relationship between coronary plaque characteristics and small embolic particles during coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1635–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Surmely JF, Nasu K, Fujita H, Terashima M, Matsuda Tsuchikane E, et al. Coronary plaque composition of culprit/target lesions according to the clinical presentation. A virtual histology intravascular ultrasound analysis. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2939–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura R, Ito K, Koide M, Taniguchi T, Irie H, Kinoshita N, et al. Coronary artery plaque assessment using volcano therapeutics virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and temperature guide wire. J Cardiol. 2006;48:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura T, Kubo N, Ako J, Momomura S. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon and plaque characteristics by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. 2007;20:335–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, Wijns W, Colombo A, Bose D, et al. Association of plaque characterization by intravascular ultrasound virtual histology and arterial remodeling. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1476–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaque. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:2493–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, Hijnen DJ, de Kleijn DP, Teepen H, van der Wal AC, et al. Atherosclerotic arterial remodeling and the localization of macrophages and matrix metalloproteases I, 2 and 9 in the human coronary artery. Atherosclerosis. 2000;150:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura M, Nishikawa H, Mukai S, Setsuda M, Nakajima K, Tamada H, et al. Impact of coronary artery remodeling on clinical presentation of coronary artery disease. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissman NJ, Sheris SJ, Chari R, Mendelson FO, Anderson WD, Breall JA, et al. Intravascular ultrasonic analysis of plaque characteristics associated with coronary artery remodeling. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:37–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Higashiguchi Y, Tanabe K, Yamamoto H, Aoki J, Nakazawa G, Onuma Y, et al. Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque composition in culprit lesions. An intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis. Circ J. 2007;71:654–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakamura M, Nishikawa H, Mukai S, Setsuda M, Nakajima K, Tamada H, et al. Impact of coronary artery remodeling on clinical presentation of coronary artery disease; an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. von Birgelen C, Klinkhart W, Mintz GS, Papatheodorou A, Herrmann J, Baumgart D, et al. Plaque distribution and vascular remodeling of ruptured and nonruptured coronary plaques in the same vessel. An intravascular ultrasound study in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1864–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Weber D, Virmani R. Morphologycal predictors of arterial remodeling in coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bluestein D, Alemu Y, Avrahami I, Gharib M, Dumont K, Ricotta JJ, et al. Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modeling. J Biomech. 2008;41:111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Endo M, Hibi K, Shimizu T, Komura N, Kusama I, Otsuka F, et al. Impact of ultrasound attenuation and plaque rupture as detected by intravascular ultrasound on the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:540–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitaka Inoue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, F., Ueshima, K., Fujimoto, T. et al. Coronary plaque characteristics that indicate distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina-virtual histology intravascular ultrasound study. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 28, 227–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-013-0157-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-013-0157-0

Keywords

Navigation