Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Evaluation of Malt Barley: from Malting Quality and Breeding Perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lack of suitable malt barley varieties that exhibit high yielding, stable performance, and good malting quality is the major factor among several production constraints contributing to low productivity of malt barley in the North Gondar Zone. The present study was done to evaluate and recommend the best performing varieties in the major potential areas of North Gondar. The experiment was conducted at three locations for two consecutive years (2015 and 2016) during the main cropping season using twelve improved varieties. The design was randomized complete block design with three replications. Analysis of variance and GGE [genotype main effect (G) and genotype-by-environment interaction (GE)] biplot analysis were conducted following their respective procedures. Combined analysis of variance revealed a highly significant difference (P < 0.01) among genotypes, environments, and genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield, most agronomic and malt quality traits. All the varieties had acceptable malt quality traits. The variety IBON-174/03 was found to be the highest yielding and the most stable variety across environments. According to the polygon view of biplot analysis, the varieties were spread across four sections and the test environments spread across two sections. Among the six test environments, D and C were more discriminating and F and B were less discriminating. Test environments F, E, and A were found to be more representative of the mega-environment than D. Considering early maturity, malt quality, grain yield, and stability performance; it is recommended to use the variety IBON-174/03 for production in the study areas and in similar areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayeh M, Berhane L. 2011. Barley research and development in Ethiopia–an overview. In: Mulatu B, Grando S, eds, Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28–30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 1–16

  • Berhane L, Hailu G, Fikadu A. 1996. Barley production and research. In: Hailu Gebre and Joob Van Luer, eds, Barley Research in Ethiopia: Past work and future prospects. Proceeding of the first barley research review workshop. 16–19 October 1993, Addis Ababa, IAR/ICARDA. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Biadge K, Yadesa A. 2017. Malt quality profile of malt barley varieties grown in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Int. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2: 130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Agency. 2017/18. Agricultural Sample survey. Report on area and production of major crops. Statistical Bulletin 586, Volume I, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TK. 2010. Genetic Variation of Malt Barley Genotypes in their Yield and N–use Efficiency. MSc. Thesis. Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Emebiria L, Moodya D, Panozzoa JF, Readb J. 2003. Mapping of QTL for malting quality attributes in barley based on a cross of parents with low grain protein concentration. Department of Primary Industrious, Reserch and Development Division, Natimuk Road, Privet Bag 260, Horsham, Vic.3401, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasika T. 2014. Assela Malt Factory to suspend production. Adiss Fortune, Adiss Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay K, Wilkinson G. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programme. Aus. J. Agri. Res. 14: 742–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, KR. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW. 1997. Identifying mega–environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getachew L, Tolosa A, Tesyaye Z. 2011. Unexploited opportunity in agro–processing: The case of malt barley in Ethiopia. In: Mulatu B, Grando S, eds, Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28–30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 339–350

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Y, Akcura M, Taner S. 2006. GGE–biplot analysis of multienvironment yield trials in bread wheat. Turk. J. Agric. 30: 325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemelew M. 2011. Opportunities and challenges in malt barley research and production in North Shewa of the Amhara Region. In: Mulatu B, and Grando S, eds, Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28–30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 73–76

  • Moral LFG, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA. 2002. Initiation and appearance of vegetative and reproductive structures throughout barley development, In Slafer G, eds, Barley Science: Recent Advances from Molecular Biology to Agronomy of Yield and Quality, ED 2, Vol 3. Food Products Press, New York, London, Oxford, pp 243–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu B, Grando S. 2011. Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceeding of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28–30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria

    Google Scholar 

  • Muez M, Sentayehu A, Berhane L, Haddis Y, Mizan T. 2014. Parametric stability analysis of malt barley genotypes for grain yield in Tigray, Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. 10: 210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Muluken B. 2013. Study on malting barley genotypes under diverse Agroecologies of northwestern Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 7: 548–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds N. 1981. Genotype (G), environment (E), and GE components of crop yields. Expl. Agric. 17: 355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadese K. 2011. Malting barley marketing and malt production from barley in Ethiopia In: Mulatu B, Grando S, eds, Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop. 28–30 November 2006, HARC, Holetta, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp 327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Tura K, Gashaw G. 2015. Review of barley value chain management in Ethiopia. J. Biol.Agric. Healthcare 5: 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W. 2001. GGEBiplot―A Windows application forgraphical analysis of multi–environment trial data and other types of two–way data. Agron. J. 93: 1111–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega–environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40: 596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomist. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype–by–environment data. Crop Sci. 47: 641–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Rajcan I. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Tinker NA. 2006. Biplo analysis of mulit–environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 623–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetsedaw A, Tadesse D, Wondimu B. 2013. Participatory evaluation of malt barley (Hordeum ulgare L.) genotypes for yield and other agronomic traits at North–West Ethiopia. Wudpecker J. Agric. 2: 218–222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tazebchew Asres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asres, T., Tadesse, D., Wossen, T. et al. Performance Evaluation of Malt Barley: from Malting Quality and Breeding Perspective. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 21, 451–457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-018-0199-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-018-0199-0

Key words

Navigation