Advertisement

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 367–374 | Cite as

Genetic Diversity of Ethiopian Tef [(Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] Released and Selected Farmers’ Varieties along with Two Wild Relatives as Revealed by Microsatellite Markers

  • Tsion FikreEmail author
  • Kassahun Tesfaye
  • Kebebew Assefa
Research Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Knowledge on the extent and pattern of diversity in crop species is a precondition for any crop improvement as it helps breeders in determining apt breeding approaches. The genetic diversity of 49 tef genotypes (36 improved varieties, 10 farmers’ varieties, 3 elite lines) and 2 wild relatives was investigated using nine SSR markers. A total of 52 alleles were amplified with a mean of six alleles per locus, and mean polymorphic information content and gene diversity values of 0.69 and 0.73, respectively. The analysis of molecular variance showed higher percentage of variation within individuals (60%) and the variation among groups was the least (10%).The lowest pair-wise genetic differentiation and highest gene flow were observed among the varieties obtained through hybridization and direct selection. Genetic distance analysis showed the smallest (GD=0.101) between varieties from direct selection and hybridization and the largest (GD= 0.454) between wild Eragrostis accessions and cultivated tef accessions. The dendrogram based on the cluster analysis grouped the tested genotypes into three major clusters. PCoA showed that the first three most informative principal coordinates accounted 29% of the genetic variation. In summary, the farmer’s varieties are distant from the improved varieties and represent more genetic diversity. This finding is of interest to national breeding program to use the farmer’s material as a source of genetic variation for traits of interest. Similarly, wild relatives showed highest genetic distance however, further investigation is required in order to identify useful genes controlling agro-morphological characters.

Key words

Ethiopia genetic diversity microsatellite markers tef 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraha M T, H Shimelis 2016. Assessment of the genetic relationship of tef (Eragrostis tef) genotypes using SSR markers. South African J. of Botany 105: 106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adnew T, Ketema S, Tefera H, Sridhara H. 2005. Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amelework B, Shimelis H, Tongoona P, Laing M, Mengistu F. 2015. Genetic variation in lowland sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces assessed by simple sequence repeats. Plant Genetic Resources 13: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assefa K, Ketema S, Tefera H, Nguyen H T, Blum A, Ayele M, Bai G, Simane B, Kefyalew T. 1999. Diversity among germplasm lines of the Ethiopian cereal tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Euphytica 106: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assefa K, Ketema S, Tefera H, Kefyalew T, Hundera F. 2000. Trait diversity, heritability and genetic advance in selected germplasm lines of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Hereditas 133: 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assefa K, Merker A, Tefera H. 2003a. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis of genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Hereditas 139: 174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayele M, Dolezel J, van Duren M, Brunner H, Zapata–Arias F J. 1996. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear genome of the Ethiopian cereal Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Genetica 98: 211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayele M, Tefera H, Assefa K, Nguyen H T. 1999. Genetic characterization of two Eragrostis species using AFLP and morphological traits. Hereditas 130: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai G H, Ayele M, Tefera H, Nguyen H T. 2000. Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter] and its relatives as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Euphytica 112: 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baraket G, Chatti K, Saddoud O, Ben–Abdelkarim A, Mars M, Trifi M, Hannachi A. 2011. Comparative assessment of SSR and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of fig (Ficuscarica L.) genetic resources in Tunisia. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29: 171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borsch T, Hilu KW, Quandt D, Wilde V, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. 2004. Non–coding plastid trnT–trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 558–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. 1980 Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using RFLPs. Am. J. of Human Genet. 32(3): 314–331Google Scholar
  13. Chanyalew S. 2007 Phenotypic Evaluation and Molecular Study of Parents and Recombinant Inbred Lines of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. PhD Thesis. Haramaya University, HaramyaGoogle Scholar
  14. CSA. 2016. Central Statistics Agency. Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Area Production and Yield of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings. Meher Season). Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  15. He Q, Li XW, Liang GL et al. 2011. Genetic diversity and identity of Chinese loquat cultivars/accessions (Eriobotrya japonica) using apple SSR markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29: 197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ketema S. 1993. Tef (Eragrostis tef): Breeding, Genetic Resources, Agronomy, Utilization and Role in Ethiopian Agriculture. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ketema S. 1997. Tef: [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]: Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, p. 12Google Scholar
  18. Kong Q, Li X, Xiang C et al. 2011. Genetic diversity of radish (Raphanussativus L.) germplasm resource revealed by A FL P and RA PD markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29: 217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu K, Muse SV. 2005. Power Marker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MoA. 2016. Ministry of Agriculture Plant Variety Release, Protection, and Seed Quality Control Directorate, Crop Variety Register No.19. Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna TG, Yano M, Bhatia CR, Sasaki T. 1997. Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker–assisted selection in crop plants. Mol Breed. 3: 87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peakall R, Smouse P E. 2006. GENAlEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population Genetics Software for Teaching and Research Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288–295Google Scholar
  23. Perrier X, Jacquemoud–Collet JP. 2006. DARwin Software. http://darwi n.ci rad.fr/Google Scholar
  24. Plaza–Wuthrich S, Cannarozzi G, Tadele Z. 2013. Genetic and phenotypic diversity in selected genotypes of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter. Afri. J. of Agri. Res. 8: 1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saeed A, Hovsepyan H, Darvishzadeh R et al. 2011. Genetic Diversity of Iranian accessions, improved lines of Chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) and their wild relatives by using simple sequence repeats. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29: 848–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharma SS, Negi M S, Sinha P, Kumar K, Tripathi S B. 2011. Assessment of genetic diversity of biodiesel species Pongamiapinnata accession using AFLP and three endonuclease–AFLP. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29: 12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soller M and Beckmann J S. 1983. Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tautz D. 1989. Hyper variability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 6463–6471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vavilov NI. 1951. The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding of Cultivated Plants (translated from Russian by K. Star Chester).The Ronald Press Co, New York, pp 37–38Google Scholar
  30. Warburton M, Crossa J. 2002. Data analysis in the CIMMYT Applied Biotechnology Center: For finger printing and genetic diversity studies. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeid M, Belay G, Mulkey S, Poland J, Sorrells M.E. 2011. QTL mapping for yield and lodging resistance in an enhanced SSR–based map for tef. Theor. Appl. Genet. 122: 77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeid M, Assefa K, Haddis A, Chanyalew S, Sorrells ME. 2012. Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter] using SSR markers. Field Crops Res. 127: 64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Crop Science (KSCS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Debre Zeit Agricultural Research CenterDebre ZeitEthiopia
  2. 2.Addis Ababa UniversityInstitute of BiotechnologyAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations