Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy evaluation of the crop-weather yield predictive models of Italian ryegrass and forage rye using cross-validation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the yield predictive models of Italian ryegrass (IRG, Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and forage rye (FR, Secale cereale L.) reported in previous studies through K-fold cross-validation method. In previous studies, statistical models were constructed for dry matter yield prediction of IRG and FR using general linear model based on climatic data by locations in the Republic of Korea. The yield predictive model for IRG cultivated in the southern region of the Korean Peninsula and Jeju Island were DMY = 78.178AGD–254.622MTJ + 64.156SGD–76.954PAT150 + 4.711SAP + 1028.295 + Location and DMY =–8.044AAT + 18.640SDS–7.542SAT + 9.610SAP + 17282.191, respectively. The yield predictive model for FR was as follows: DMY = 20.999AGD + 163.705LTJ + 113.716SGD + 64.379PAT100–4964.728 + Location. However, accuracy evaluation was not performed in the previous research. In this study, the reported models and the data set used for model construction were investigated. Subsequently, K-fold cross-validation was performed to assess the accuracy of the models. The results showed that the yield predictive models fit to the data sets well, while the accuracy of these models was in the common level since the data sources might keep major variances in cultivars, climatic conditions, and cultivated locations. Therefore, models with better fitness and accuracy might be constructed based on a data set with smaller variance. Hence, the standardization of the crop cultivation experiments is very necessary to decrease the variance in the historical data used for future crop yield modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar MK, Corzo GA, Van Andel SJ, Jonoski A. 2009. River flow forecasting with artificial neural networks using satellite observed precipitation pre-processed with flow length and travel time information: case study of the Ganges River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13: 1607–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behdani MA, Al-Ahmadi MJ, Fallahi HR. 2016. Biomass partitioning during the life cycle of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) using regression models. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 1: 71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Bandopadhyay S. 2012. Reliability estimation using a genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network: An application to a load-haul-dump machine. Expert Syst. Appl. 39: 10943–10951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excel. 2010. Microsoft Excel 2010. Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng HH. 2010. Studies on dynamic prediction of rice yield in county based on crop model and GIS. Master Thesis. Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins DM, Basak SC, Mills D. 2003. Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43: 579–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim NY, Chae HS, Woo JH, Cho IC, Cho SR, Cho WM, Park YS, Ko MS, Park NG. 2014. Changes of Feed Value and Productivity According to Supplemental Seeding Rates for Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) in Jeju. Ann. Anim. Resour. Sci. 25, 23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Sang W, Shin P, Cho H, Seo M, Yoo B, Kim KS. 2015. Evaluation of regional climate scenario data for impact assessment of climate change on rice productivity in Korea. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 18: 257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KS, Yoo B. 2015. Comparison of regional climate scenario data by a spatial resolution for the impact assessment of the uncertainty associated with meteorological inputs data on crop yield simulations in Korea. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 18: 249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko J, Ahuja LR. 2013. Global warming likely reduces crop yield and water availability of the dryland cropping systems in the US Central Great Plains. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 16: 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko J, Kim HY, Jeong S, An JB, Choi G, Kang S, Tenhunen J. 2014. Potential impacts on climate change on paddy rice yield in mountainous highland terrains. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 17: 117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak A, Kozak R. 2003. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Can. J. Forest. Res. 33: 976–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Johnson K. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer, New York, pp 69–77

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB. 2009. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34: 179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell SE. 2000. Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychol. Methods 5: 434–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osten DW. 1988. Selection of optimal regression models via cross–validation. J. Chemom. 2: 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng JL, Kim MJ, Kim BW, Sung KI. 2016a. A yield estimation model of forage rye based on climate data by locations in South Korea using general linear model. J. Kor. Grassl. Forage. Sci. 36: 205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng JL, Kim MJ, Kim BW, Sung KI. 2016b. Models for estimating yield of Italian ryegrass in south areas of Korean Peninsula and Jeju Island. J. Kor. Grassl. Forage. Sci. 36: 223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng JL, Kim MJ, Kim YJ, Jo MH, Kim BW, Sung KI, Lv SJ. 2017. Constructing Italian ryegrass yield prediction model based on climatic data by locations in South Korea. Grassl. Sci. 63: 184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard RR, Cook RD. 1984. Cross-validation of regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79: 575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H. 2009. Cross-validation. In: L Liu, MT Özsu, eds, Encyclopedia of Database Systems, Springer, New York, pp 532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Losavio N, Flagella Z. 2003. Evaluation and application of the OILCROP-SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agricult. Sys. 78: 17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvacion AR, Martin AA. 2016. Climate change impact on corn suitability in Isabela Province, Philippines. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 19: 223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer C. 1993. Selecting a classification method by crossvalidation. Mach. Learn. 13: 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo S. 2016. Forage production, utilization, and animal husbandry in Korea. In Proceedings of the 6th Korea-China-Japan grassland conference, Jeju, pp 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao J. 1993. Linear model selection by cross–validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88: 486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokri S, Marvast MA, Sadeghi MT, Narasimhan S. 2016. Combination of data rectification techniques and soft sensor model for robust prediction of sulfur content in HDS process. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 58: 117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno Y, Prasher SO, Patel RM, Strachan IB, Pattey E, Karimi Y. 2005. Development of field-scale soil organic matter content estimation models in Eastern Canada using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 47: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang Y. 2015. Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure. J. Econometrics 187: 95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Il Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, JL., Kim, MJ., Jo, MH. et al. Accuracy evaluation of the crop-weather yield predictive models of Italian ryegrass and forage rye using cross-validation. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 20, 327–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0090-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0090-0

Key words

Navigation