Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of regional climate scenario data by a spatial resolution for the impact assessment of the uncertainty associated with meteorological inputs data on crop yield simulations in Korea

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Uncertainty of crop yield simulation would be affected by weather input data prepared from different sources of climate datasets. Although regional climate data at a high spatial resolution would be useful for the impact assessment of climate change on crop production, little effort has been made to characterize the uncertainty associated with such climate data in terms of crop yield simulations. The objectives of this study were to compare climate scenario data products obtained from a series of downscaling processes and to identify an overall pattern of uncertainty in these climate data in terms of crop yield simulation. Regional climate scenario data from 2011 to 2014 had a spatiotemporal pattern of uncertainty, which differed by meteorological variables and spatial resolution. Overall, the uncertainty of daily minimum temperature was greater than that of maximum temperature. Daily minimum temperature also had relatively greater uncertainty in an early season of crop production, which could result in the cumulative impact on the uncertainty of crop yield simulations. For the uncertainty of climate data at different spatial resolution, climate data at higher spatial resolution, e.g. 1 km, tended to have lower uncertainty than data at resolution of 12.5 km did. Still, the uncertainty of regional climate data was relatively similar between data at resolution of 12.5 km and 1 km in major rice production areas in Korea except in areas near Seosan. This merits further studies to examine actual differences in projected crop yields using regional climate scenario data in the future and to assess the impact of uncertainty associated with regional climate data on crop yield simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angulo C, Rötter R, Lock R, Enders A, Fronzek S, Ewert F. 2013. Implication of crop model calibration strategies for assessing regional impacts of climate change in Europe. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 170: 32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Ewert F, Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL et al. 2013. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under cli mate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3: 827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dai C, Yao M, Xie Z, Chen C, Liu J. 2009. Parameter optimization for growth model of greenhouse crop using genetic algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput. 9: 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan E, Keulen HV, Jones JW, Zipori I, Shmuel D, Challa H. 1993. Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I. Description of the model. Agric. Syst. 43: 145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzotsi KA, Basso B, Jones JW. 2015. Parameter and uncertainty estimation for maize, peanut and cotton using the SALUS crop model. Agric. Syst. 135: 31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor N, Kovács, GJ. 2005. Sensitivity of crop models to the inaccuracy of meteorological observations. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C. 30: 53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jégo G, Pattey E, Liu J. 2012. Using leaf area index, retrieved from optical imagery in the STICS crop model for predicting yield and biomass of field crops. Field Crops Res. 131: 63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MK, Han MS, Jand DH, Baek SG, Lee WS, Kim YH, Kim S. 2012. Production technique of observation grid data of 1 km resolution. J. Clim. Res. 7: 55–68 (Korean with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CK, Kim J, Kim KS. 2015. Development and application of a weather data service client for preparation of weather input files to a crop model. Comput. Electron. Agric. 114: 237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey Jr. FJ. 1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 46: 68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO, Easterling W, Hays C, Marx D. 2001. Comparison of agricultural impacts of climate change calculated from high and low resolution climate change scenarios: Part I. the uncertainty due to spatial scale. Clim. Change 51: 131–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIMR. 2011. Climate change scenario report 2011 for the corresponding IPCC fifth assessment report. NIMR, Jeju, 117 pp

  • Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 9971–9975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Berardi G, Fast S. 1983. Energy efficiency of farming systems: organic and conventional agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 9: 359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane AC, Müller C, et al. 2014. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 3268–3273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rötter RP, Palosuo T, Kersebaum KC, Angulo C, Bindi M, et al. 2012. Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models. Field Crops Res. 133: 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specka X, Nendel C, Wieland R. 2015. Analysing the parameter sensitivity of the agro-ecosystem model MONICA for different crops. Eur. J. Agron. 71: 73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Jones PG, Alagarswamy G, Andersen J. 2009. Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa. Global Env. Change 19: 54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Holman L, Conway D, Lin E, Li Y. 2008. A crop model cross calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies. Ecol. Model. 213: 365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Siebert S, Enders A, Rezaei EE, Yan C, Ewert F. 2015. Demand for multi-scale weather data for regional crop modeling. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 200: 156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang Soo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K.S., Yoo, B. Comparison of regional climate scenario data by a spatial resolution for the impact assessment of the uncertainty associated with meteorological inputs data on crop yield simulations in Korea. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 18, 249–255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0115-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0115-8

Keywords

Navigation