Abstract
This study was carried out to identify superior barley genotypes for the rainfed areas of western Iran using a participatory varietal selection (PVS) approach. Three field experiments were conducted in two randomly selected farmers’ fields and in one rainfed research station in the 2006–07 cropping season with 69 genotypes (including one local and one improved check). Several univariate and multivariate methods were used to analyze qualitative (farmers’ scores) and quantitative (grain yield) data. Individual farmers’ scores in each village were positively correlated, indicating that the farmers tended to discriminate genotypes in similar fashion, although the genotypes actually selected by farmers were different in the two villages. In recent years, a greater number of farmers in western Iran preferred the improved variety (Sararood-1) over the local barley (Mahali), while in this project the farmers preferred the new genotypes over the two checks. This was also verified by the quantitative data showing that the checks were outyielded by the new genotypes. Farmers were efficient in identifying the best genotypes for their specific environment, as shown by biplot analysis, indicating their competence in selection. The genotypes selected by the breeder and farmers were almost similar but some differences existed. In conclusion, PVS is a powerful way to involve farmers for selecting and testing new cultivars that are adapted to their needs, systems and environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abay F, Bjornstad A. 2008. Specific adaptation of barley varieties in different locations in Ethiopia. Euphytica 167: 181–195
Almekinders CJM, Elings A. 2001. Collaboration of farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122: 425–438
Ashby JA, Sperling L. 1995. Institutionalizing participatory, client-driven research and technology development in agriculture. In MR Bellon, J Reeves, eds, 2002. Quantitative Analysis of Data from Participatory Methods in Plant Breeding, CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 753–770
Atlin GN, Baker RJ, McRae KB, Lu X. 2000. Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 40: 7–13
Byerlee D, Husain T. 1993. Agricultural research strategies for favored and marginal areas, the experience of farming system research in Pakistan. Expl. Agric. 29: 155–171
Ceccarelli S. 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 77: 205–219
Ceccarelli S. 1996. Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica 92: 203–214
Ceccarelli S, Grando S. 2007. Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: An example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155: 349–360
Chambers R, Pacey A, Thrupp LA. 1989. Farmers first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK, pp 218.
Cleveland DA, Soleri D, Smith SE. 1999. Farmer plant breeding from a biological perspective: Implications for Collaborative Plant Breeding. CIMMYT Economics Work Paper No. 10, Mexico, DF
Danial D, Parlevliet J, Almekinders C, Thiele G. 2007. Farmers participation and breeding for durable disease resistance in the Andean region. Euphytica 153: 385–396
De Groote H, Siambi M, Friesen D, Diallo A. 2002. Identifying farmers’ preferences for new maize varieties in eastern Africa. In MR Bellon, J Reeves, eds, Quantitative Analysis of Data from Participatory Methods in Plant Breeding. CIM MYT, Mexico, DF, pp82–102
DeLacy IH, Basford KE, Cooper M, Bull JK, Mclaren CG 1996. Analysis of multi-environment trials- an historical perspective. In M Cooper, GL Hammer, eds, Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement,,CAB International, Wallingford, pp 39–124
Flores F, Moreno MT, Cubero JI. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze environments. Field Crops Res. 56: 271–286
Fox PN, Skovmand B, Thompson BK, Braun HJ, Cormier R. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47: 57–64
Francis TR, Kannenberg LW. 1978. Yield stability studied in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 1029–1034
Gabriel KR. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467
Haghparast R, Rahmanian M, Roeentan R, Rajabi R, Khodadoost F et al. 2009. Review on participatory bread wheat breeding program in Kermanshah, Iran under rainfed codition: Importance, opportunities and challenges. In R Mohammadi, R Haghparast, eds, Plant Science in Iran. Middle Eastern Russ. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 3: 1–4
Hohls T. 2001. Conditions under which selection for mean productivity tolerance to environment stress, or stability should be used to improve year across a range of contrasting environments. Euphytica 120: 235–245
Huehn M. 1979. Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med. Biol. 10: 112–117
Kroonenberg PM. 1995. Introduction to biplots for G × E tables. Department of Mathematics, Research Report 51. Univ. of Queensland, Australia
Mohammadi R, Pourdad SS, Amri A. 2008. Grain yield stability of spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 59: 546–553
Morris ML, Bellon MR. 2004. Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136: 21–34
Nassar R, Huehn M. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43: 45–53
Ortiz-Ferrara G, Bhatta MR, Pokharel TP, Mudwari A, Thapa DB, Joshi AK, Chand R, Muhammad D, Duveiller R, Rajaram S. 2001. Farmer participatory variety selection in South Asia. In Research Highlights of the Wheat Program 1999–2000, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Mai’zy Trigo, Mexico DF, pp33–37
Ortiz-Ferrara G, Joshi AK, Chand R, Bhatta MR, Mudwari A et al. 2007. Partnering with farmers to accelerate adoption of new technologies in South Asia to improve wheat productivity. Euphytica 157: 399–407
Snapp S. 1999. Mother and baby trials: a novel trial design being tried out in Malawi. In TARGET. The Newsletter of the Soil Fertility Research Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe, CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe (January 1999 issue)
Snapp SS, Rohrbach DD, Simtowe F, Freeman HA. 2002. Sustainable soil management options for Malawi: Can small holder farmers grow more legumes? Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 91: 159–174
Thapa DB, Sharma RC, Mudwari A, Ortiz-Ferrara G, Sharma S, Basnet RK, Witcombe JR, Virk DS, Joshi KD. 2009. Identifying superior wheat cultivars in participatory research on resource poor farms. Field Crops Res. 112: 124–130
Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Goyal SN. 2003. Participatory plant breeding in maize: A case study from Gujarat, India. Euphytica 130: 413–422
Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi, KD, Sthapit BR. 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp. Agric. 32: 445–460
Yan W. 2001. GGEBiplot-A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93: 1111–1118
Yan W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data. Agron. J. 94: 990–996
Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi, R., Mahmoodi, K.N., Haghparast, R. et al. Identifying superior rainfed barley genotypes in farmers’ fields using participatory varietal selection. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 281–288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0106-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0106-8