Skip to main content
Log in

Receiving de novo genetic diagnoses for autism with intellectual disability: parents’ views of impacts on families’ reproductive decisions

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parents of children with autism who receive genetic diagnoses of de novo variants face challenges in understanding the implications for reproductive decision-making. We interviewed 28 parents who received de novo genetic diagnoses for their child’s autism and intellectual disability (ID). These genetic variants proved to have reproductive implications for not only the child’s parents, but the child and his/her neurotypical siblings, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Parents had often already finished building their families but varied, overall, in whether the results had affected, or might have influenced, their reproductive decisions. Parents’ views were shaped by factors related to not only genetics, but also parental age, financial considerations, competing hopes and visions for their family’s future, perceived abilities to care for an additional child with similar symptoms, and the extent of the child’s symptoms. Members of a couple sometimes disagreed about whether to have more children. Parents pondered, too, the possibility of preimplantation genetic testing, though misunderstandings about it arose. Children with autism vary widely in their abilities to understand the reproductive implications of genetic diagnoses for themselves. Neurotypical offspring were much relieved to understand that their own children would not be affected. While some autism self-advocates have been concerned that genetic testing related to autism could lead to eugenics, the present data, concerning de novo genetic findings, raise other perspectives. These data, the first to explore several key aspects of the reproductive implications of genetic diagnoses for this group, have important implications for future practice, education, and research—e.g., concerning various family members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Julia Wynn, MS, CGC, and the SPARK study staff for facilitating our access to these participants and data collection and Timothy Keith Hung, Beverly Gu, Rebecca Grinberg, and especially Patricia Contino for their assistance with the preparation of the manuscript.

Research data policy and data availability statement

The interviewees discussed identifying details in their open-ended responses, concerning themselves, various family members, and providers, and the process of de-identification would be very difficult and complicated, so the data are not publicly available. Data used are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Center for Excellence in ELSI Research (CEER) grant program, #RM1HG007257 (Paul Appelbaum, PI), the NICDH Autism Center of Excellence grant P50HD109879 (Wendy Chung, PI), and SPARK: Simons Powering Autism Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Robert Klitzman, Paul S. Appelbaum, Wendy K. Chung, and Ekaterina Bezborodko contributed to the conceptualization, writing, data analysis, revising and drafting of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Klitzman.

Ethics declarations

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable to this study and paper. The Columbia University Department of Psychiatry/New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board approved the study.

Informed consent

We obtained informed consent from all of the participants. We thank the study participants for giving their time and perspective.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klitzman, R., Bezborodko, E., Chung, W.K. et al. Receiving de novo genetic diagnoses for autism with intellectual disability: parents’ views of impacts on families’ reproductive decisions. J Community Genet 15, 85–96 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00679-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00679-3

Keywords

Navigation