Skip to main content
Log in

Anticipating the primary care role in genomic medicine: expectations of genetics health professionals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our purpose was to explore genetics health professionals’ (GHPs) expectations of primary care providers' (PCPs) role in genomic medicine now and in the future. Focus groups/interviews were conducted with GHPs in Ontario, Canada. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using qualitative descriptive analysis. Five focus groups (6 clinical geneticists, 24 genetic counselors, 1 nurse, 4 laboratory staff, 3 genetics program administrators) and 3 interviews (nurses) were conducted. GHPs described a key role for PCPs in genomic medicine that could be enhanced if GHPs and PCPs worked together more effectively, making better use of GHPs as a scarce specialist resource, improving PCP knowledge and awareness of genomics, and increasing GHPs’ understanding of primary care practice and how to provide PCPs meaningful education and support. Health system change is needed to facilitate the GHP/PCP relationship and improve care. This might include: PCPs ordering more genetic tests independently or with GHP guidance prior to GHP consultations, genomic expertise in primary care clinics or GHPs being accessible through buddy systems or virtually through telemedicine or electronic consultation, and developing educational materials and electronic decision support for PCPs. Our findings highlight need for change in delivering genomic medicine, which requires building the relationship between GHPs and PCPs, and creating new service delivery models to meet future needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be provided upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Genetics in Primary Care Institute. www.geneticsinprimarycare.org/. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Battista RN, Blancquaert I, Laberge A-M, van Schendel N, Leduc N (2012) Genetics in health care: an overview of current and emerging models. Public Health Genom 15(1):34–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhola PT, Liddy C, Afkham A, Keely E, Graham GE (2019) A pilot eConsultation service in Eastern Ontario: bridging clinical genetics and primary care. Eur J Hum Genet 27:1026–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancer Care Ontario (2018) Recommendation Report for Ontario’s Clinical Genetic Services. https://www.cancercareontario.ca/sites/ccocancercare/files/assets/ClinicalGeneticServicesRecommendationReport.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Carroll JC, Wilson BJ, Allanson J et al (2011) GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians. Fam Pract 28(6):615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JC, Blaine S, Permaul J et al (2014) Efficacy of an educational intervention on physicians’ risk assessment and management of colorectal cancer. J Community Genet 5(4):303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JC, Grad R, Allanson JE et al (2016a) The Gene Messenger Impact Project: an innovative genetics knowledge translation strategy for primary care providers. J Contin Educ Health Prof 36(3):178–185

  • Carroll JC, Makuwaza T, Manca DP et al (2016b) on behalf of CanIMPACT. Primary care providers’ experiences and views of personalized genomic medicine. Can Fam Physician 62(10):e626–e635

  • Carroll JC, Allanson J, Morrison S et al (2019) Informing integration of genomic medicine into primary care: an assessment of current practice, attitudes and desired resources. Front Genet 10:1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constructing CK, Theory G (2006) A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SA, McIlvried D, Schnieders J (2009) A Collaborative approach to genetic testing: a community hospital’s experience. J Genet Oncol 18:530–533

    Google Scholar 

  • David SP, Johnson SG, Berger AC et al (2015) Making personalized health care even more personalized: insights from activities of the IOM genomics roundtable. Ann Fam Med 13:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delikurt T, Williamson GR, Anastasiadou V, Skirton H (2015) A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet 23:739–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwyn G, Edwards A, Iredale R, Davies P, Gray J (2005) Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 6:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery DB (2018) Challenges and opportunities for effective delivery of clinical genetic services in the U.S. healthcare system. Curr Opin Pediatr 30:740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genetics Education Canada: Knowledge Organization. http://www.geneticseducation.ca/. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Genomics Education Programme. www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82(4):586–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga SB, Burke W, Ginsburg GS, Mills R, Agans R (2012) Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet 82(4):388–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haga SB, Burke W, Agans R (2013) Primary-care physicians’ access to genetic specialists: an impediment to the routine use of genomic medicine? Genet Med 15(7):513–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AB, Oishi S, Yano EM, Gammage CE, Marshall NJ, Scheuner MT (2014) Factors influencing organizational adoption and implementation of clinical genetic services. Genet Med 16(3):238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding B, Webber C, Ruhland L et al (2019) Bridging the gap in genetics: a progressive model for primary to specialist care. BMC Med Educ 19:195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houwink EJF, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Dinant GJ, Cornel MC (2011) Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam Pract 12:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houwink EJF, Sollie AW, Numans ME, Cornel MC (2013) Proposed roadmap to stepwise integration of genetics in family medicine and clinical research. Clin Transl Med 2:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houwink EJF, van Teeffelen SR, Muijtjens AMM et al (2014) Sustained effects of online genetics education: a randomized controlled trial on oncogenetics. Eur J Hum Genet 22:310–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson L, O’Connor A, Paneque M et al (2018) The Gen-Equip Project: evaluation and impact of genetics e-learning resources for primary care in six European languages. Genet Med 21:718–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromberg JG, Parkes J, Taylor S (2006) Genetic counselling as a developing healthcare profession: a case study in the Queensland context. Aust J Prim Health 12:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B et al (2013) Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 15(4):258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA (2015) Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 17(3):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute. Genetics/Genomics Competency Center for Education. www.genomicseducation.net. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Paneque M, Cornel MC, Curtisova V et al (2017) Implementing genetic education in primary care: the Gen-Equip programme. J Community Genet 8:147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paneque M, Turchetti D, Jackson L, Lunt P, Houwink E, Skirton H (2016) A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care. BMC Fam Pract 17:89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) The nature of qualitative inquiry. In: Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Pearce C, Goettke E, Hallowell N, McCormack P, Flinter F, McKevitt C (2019) Delivering genomic medicine in the United Kingdom National Health Service: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Genet Med 21:2667–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid EK, Johansen Taber KA, Nissen TI et al (2016) What works in genomics education: outcomes of an evidenced-based instructional model for community-based physicians. Genet Med 18(7):737–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Mandel J, Bloss CS (2018) Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States. Hum Mol Genet 27:R250-258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M (2000) Focus on research methods. Whatever happened to qualitative description. Res Nurs Health 23:334–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll K, Kubendran S, Cohen SA (2018) The past, present and future of service delivery in genetic counseling: keeping up in the era of precision medicine. Am J Med Genet 178C:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Jackson Laboratory. https://www.jax.org/education-and-learning/clinical-and-continuing-education/ . Accessed 29 Aug 2020

  • Westwood G, Pickering RM, Latter S, Lucassen A, Little P, Temple K (2006) Feasibility and acceptability of providing nurse counsellor genetics clinics in primary care. J Adv Nurs 53:591–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Genetics Education Canada—Knowledge Organization (GEC-KO) which is supported by funding from the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JC: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, writing–original draft.

SM: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, writing–review and editing.

FM: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, writing–review and editing.

BW: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, writing–review and editing.

JP: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, writing–review and editing.

JA: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, writing–review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to June C. Carroll.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board (REB). Informed consent was obtained from all participants as required by the REB.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carroll, J.C., Morrison, S., Miller, F.A. et al. Anticipating the primary care role in genomic medicine: expectations of genetics health professionals. J Community Genet 12, 559–568 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00544-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00544-1

Keywords

Navigation