References
Botkin JR, Rothwell E, Anderson R, Stark LA, Mitchell J (2014) Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. J Community Genet 5(3):205–213. doi:10.1007/s12687-013-0175-8
Carnahan SJ (2011) Biobanking newborn bloodspots for genetic research without consent. J Health Care Law Policy 14(2):299–330
Drabiak-Syed K (2010) Lessons from Havasupai tribe v. Arizona state university board of regents: recognizing group, cultural, and dignity harms as legitimate risks warranting integration into research practice. J Health Biomed Law 6(2):175–225
Master Z, Nelson E, Murdoch B, Caulfield T (2012) Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus. Nat Methods 9(9):885–888. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2142
Mello MM, Wolf LE (2010) The Havasupai Indian tribe case—lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N Engl J Med 363(3):204–207. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1005203
Compliance with ethics guidelines
Sean Nurmsoo and Molly Hayes declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nurmsoo, S., Hayes, M. Awareness of risks of biobank research may affect public attitudes toward consent. J Community Genet 6, 181–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0215-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0215-7