Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of two-year Jewish genetic disease screening program in Atlanta: insight into community genetic screening approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improvements in genetic testing technologies have led to the development of expanded carrier screening panels for the Ashkenazi Jewish population; however, there are major inconsistencies in current screening practices. A 2-year pilot program was launched in Atlanta in 2010 to promote and facilitate screening for 19 Jewish genetic diseases. We analyzed data from this program, including participant demographics and outreach efforts. This retrospective analysis is based on a de-identified dataset of 724 screenees. Data were obtained through medical chart review and questionnaires and included demographic information, screening results, response to outreach efforts, and follow-up behavior and preferences. We applied descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, and logistic regression to analyze the data and compare findings with published literature. The majority of participants indicated that they were not pregnant or did not have a partner who was pregnant were affiliated with Jewish organizations and reported 100 % AJ ancestry. Overall, carrier frequency was 1 in 3.9. Friends, rabbis, and family members were the most common influencers of the decision to receive screening. People who were older, had a history of pregnancy, and had been previously screened were more likely to educate others (all p < 0.05). Analysis of this 2-year program indicated that people who are ready to have children or expand their families are more likely to get screened and encourage others to be screened. The most effective outreach efforts targeted influencers who then encouraged screening in the target population. Educating influencers and increasing overall awareness were the most effective outreach strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics (2004) ACOG committee opinion. Number 298, August 2004. Prenatal and preconceptional carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstet Gynecol 104:425–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstet Gynecol 114:950–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald AD, McClaren BJ (2012) Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making. J Commun Genet 3:47–54. doi:10.1007/s12687-011-0067-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlanta JFoG (2007) The Jewish community centennial study of Greater Atlanta: 2006 The Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta

  • Bonham VL, Knerr S, Feero WG, Stevens N, Jenkins JF, McBride CM (2010) Patient physical characteristics and primary care physician decision making in preconception genetic screening. Publ Health Genom 13:336–344. doi:10.1159/000262328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grody WW, Cutting GR, Klinger KW, Richards CS, Watson MS, Desnick RJ, Subcommittee on Cystic Fibrosis Screening AoGSCAACoMG (2001) Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 3:149–154. doi:10.1097/00125817-200103000-00010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross SJ, Pletcher BA, Monaghan KG, Professional P, Guidelines C (2008) Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 10:54–56. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f247c

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman JD et al (2014) The Ashkenazi Jewish carrier screening panel: evolution, status quo, and disparities. LID. doi:10.1002/pd.4446

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens S, De Paepe A, Borry P (2014) Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature. J Commun Genet 5:13–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan F (1998) Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening: a model for prevention of genetic disease. Genet Test 2:271–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman S, Schreiber-Agus N, Nazareth S, Evans EA (2013) Detection of carriers in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: an objective comparison of high-throughput genotyping versus gene-by-gene testing. Genet Test Mol Biomark 17:763–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornreich R, Ekstein J, Edelmann L, Desnick RJ (2004) Premarital and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: experience in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 6:415–420. doi:10.1097/01.GIM.0000139510.00644.F7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronn D, Jansen V, Ostrer H (1998) Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, Gaucher disease, and Tay-Sachs disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: the first 1000 cases at New York University Medical Center, New York, NY. Arch Intern Med 158:777–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence Kotler-Berkowitz SMC (2003) The National Jewish Population Survey 2000–01. The Jewish Federation, North America

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion JP, Danner DJ, Ballou WR, Marion R, Elsas LJ 2nd (1977) Testing for the Tay-Sachs gene in the Atlanta Jewish population. South Med J 70:833–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe SA (2012) Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care. J Commun Genet 3:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner G, Rosner S, Orr-Urtreger A (2009) Genetic testing in Israel: an overview. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:175–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.030308.111406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SA, Edelmann L, Liu L, Luo M, Desnick RJ, Kornreich R (2010) Experience with carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis for 16 Ashkenazi Jewish genetic diseases. Hum Mutat 31:1240–1250. doi:10.1002/humu.21327

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strom CM, Crossley B, Fau-Redman JB, Redman JB, Fau-Quan F, Quan F, Fau-Buller A, Buller A, Fau-McGinniss MJ, McGinniss MJ, Fau-Sun W, Sun W (2004) Molecular screening for diseases frequent in Ashkenazi Jews: lessons learned from more than 100,000 tests performed in a commercial laboratory. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 6:145–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe ESL, Kramer RM, Parmer D (2013) American Jewish Population Estimates: 2012.39

  • Victor Center (2014) JGD Matrix. Victor Center for the Prevention of Jewish Genetic Disease. http://www.victorcenters.org/index.cfm/lets-talk-jgds/.2014

  • Zlotogora J (2009) Population programs for the detection of couples at risk for severe monogenic genetic diseases. Hum Genet 126:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the many students and volunteers who assisted us with educational and screening events.

Compliance and ethics guidelines

This retrospective analysis complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed.

Conflict of interest

Yunru Shao, Shuling Liu, and Karen Grinzaid declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Grinzaid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, Y., Liu, S. & Grinzaid, K. Evaluation of two-year Jewish genetic disease screening program in Atlanta: insight into community genetic screening approaches. J Community Genet 6, 137–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0208-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0208-y

Keywords

Navigation