Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 1031–1033 | Cite as

Characterization of microsatellite loci for Cypripediumkentuckiense (Orchidaceae)

Technical Note

Abstract

Cypripedium kentuckiense is one of the 15 Cypripedium species found in North America. Its populations are threatened by illegal collection and land conversion. Assessing the level of genetic variation within-and-among populations employing species-specific and variable co-dominant molecular markers such as microsatellite can assist in developing appropriate conservation strategies. For the first time, we report eight polymorphic nuclear microsatellite markers for C. kentuckiense. Number of alleles per locus ranged from two to eight and the mean number of alleles across eight loci was 4.13. Mean observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) values were 0.514 and 0.522, respectively. The eight markers reported in this study can be used to estimate genetic diversity, genetic structure, gene flow, and mating system of the species.

Keywords

Conservation genetics Cypripedium kentuckiense Microsatellite Orchid 

References

  1. Case MA (1994) Extensive variation in the levels of genetic diversity and degree of relatedness among five species of Cypripedium (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 81:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Case MA, Mlodozeniec HT, Wallace LE, Weldy TW (1998) Conservation genetics and taxonomic status of the rare Kentucky lady’s slipper: Cypripedium kentuckiense (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 85:1779–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung JM, Park KW, Park C-S, Lee S-H, Chung MG, Chung MY (2009) Contrasting levels of genetic diversity between the historically rare orchid Cypripedium japonicum and the historically common Cypripedium macranthos in South Korea. Bot J Linn Soc 160:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Izawa T, Kawahara T, Takahashi H (2007) Genetic diversity of an endangered plant, Cypripedium macranthos var. rebunense (Orchidaceae): background genetic research for future conservation. Conserv Genet 8:1369–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. NatureServe (2013) NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life (web application). Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available at: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer
  6. Pandey M, Sharma J (2012) Efficiency of microsatellite isolation from orchids via next generation sequencing. Open J Genet 2:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop version 1.2: a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  9. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Willis DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wallace LE, Case MA (2000) Contrasting allozyme diversity between northern and southern populations of Cypripedium parviflorum (Orchidaceae): implications for pleistocene refugia and taxonomic boundaries. Syst Bot 25:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weldy TW, Mlodzeniec HT, Wallace LE, Case MA (1996) The current status of Cypripedium kentuckiense (Orchidaceae) including a morphological analysis of a newly discovered population in eastern Virginia. Sida 17:423–435Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations