Advertisement

Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 283–284 | Cite as

A blocking primer increases specificity in environmental DNA detection of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)

  • Taylor M. WilcoxEmail author
  • Michael K. Schwartz
  • Kevin S. McKelvey
  • Michael K. Young
  • Winsor H. Lowe
Technical Note

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly applied as a highly sensitive way to detect aquatic animals non-invasively. However, distinguishing closely related taxa can be particularly challenging. Previous studies of ancient DNA and genetic diet analysis have used blocking primers to enrich target template in the presence of abundant, non-target DNA. Here we apply a blocking primer to increase the specificity of a TaqMan assay for eDNA detection of rare and endangered bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the presence of the closely related (Salvelinus namaycush). We found that addition of a blocking primer substantially increased assay specificity without compromising sensitivity or quantification ability.

Keywords

Environmental DNA Bull trout Blocking primer Complex templates 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the McCutheon Lab at the University of Montana for use of their spectrophotometer. TW is supported by a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant No. DGE-1313190).

References

  1. Boessenkool S, Epp LS, Haile J et al (2012) Blocking human contaminant DNA during PCR allows amplification of rare mammal species from sedimentary ancient DNA. Mol Ecol 21:1806–1815. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05306 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darling JA, Mahon AR (2011) From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environ Res 111:978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deagle BE, Chiaradia A, McInnes J, Jarman SN (2010) Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out? Conserv Genet 11:2039–2048. doi: 10.1007/s10592-010-0096-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4:150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Vestheim H, Jarman SN (2008) Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples—a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Front Zool 5:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK et al (2013) Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity. PLoS One 8:e59520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059520 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wright ES, Yilmaz LS, Ram S, et al. (2013) Exploiting extension bias in polymerase chain reaction to improve primer specificity in ensembles of nearly identical DNA templates. Environ Microbiol n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12259

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taylor M. Wilcox
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael K. Schwartz
    • 2
  • Kevin S. McKelvey
    • 2
  • Michael K. Young
    • 2
  • Winsor H. Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations